LVS vs. HLT
LVS (Las Vegas Sands Corp.) and HLT (Hilton Worldwide Holdings Inc.) are both stocks. Both are in the Consumer Cyclical sector — LVS in Resorts & Casinos, HLT in Lodging. Over the past 10 years, LVS returned 2.41%/yr vs 46.15%/yr for HLT. At a 0.46 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
LVS vs. HLT - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, LVS achieves a -28.70% return, which is significantly lower than HLT's 12.36% return. Over the past 10 years, LVS has underperformed HLT with an annualized return of 2.41%, while HLT has yielded a comparatively higher 46.15% annualized return.
LVS
- 1D
- -1.69%
- 1M
- -9.41%
- 6M
- -22.51%
- YTD
- -28.70%
- 1Y
- -6.00%
- 3Y*
- -7.26%
- 5Y*
- -0.61%
- 10Y*
- 2.41%
HLT
- 1D
- -3.88%
- 1M
- -6.79%
- 6M
- 7.44%
- YTD
- 12.36%
- 1Y
- 16.52%
- 3Y*
- 30.04%
- 5Y*
- 21.41%
- 10Y*
- 46.15%
LVS vs. HLT - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LVS Las Vegas Sands Corp. | -28.70% | 29.45% | 6.21% | 3.15% | 27.71% | -36.85% | -11.95% | 39.54% | -21.62% | 36.16% |
HLT Hilton Worldwide Holdings Inc. | 12.36% | 16.49% | 36.11% | 44.68% | -18.72% | 40.20% | 0.47% | 55.48% | -9.40% | 829.98% |
Correlation
The correlation between LVS and HLT is 0.31, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.31 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.37 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.44 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.48 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 12, 2013 | 0.46 |
The correlation between LVS and HLT shifts across timeframes, from 0.31 (1 year) to 0.48 (10 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
LVS:
$30.42B
HLT:
$73.41B
LVS:
$2.72
HLT:
$6.52
LVS:
16.89
HLT:
49.49
LVS:
31.65
HLT:
0.80
LVS:
2.26
HLT:
6.21
LVS:
$13.74B
HLT:
$12.28B
LVS:
$3.67B
HLT:
$5.44B
LVS:
$4.76B
HLT:
$3.00B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
LVS vs. HLT — Risk / Return Rank
LVS
HLT
LVS vs. HLT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Las Vegas Sands Corp. (LVS) and Hilton Worldwide Holdings Inc. (HLT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| LVS | HLT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.89 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.19 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.00 | 1.14 | -0.14 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.18 | 1.61 | -1.79 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.36 | 3.65 | -4.01 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
LVS vs. HLT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum LVS drawdown since its inception was -99.02%, which is greater than HLT's maximum drawdown of -50.82%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LVS and HLT.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| LVS | HLT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -99.02% | -50.82% | -48.20% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -33.22% | -10.29% | -22.93% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -48.04% | -26.35% | -21.69% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -51.18% | -32.65% | -18.53% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -58.77% | -50.82% | -7.95% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -49.59% | -7.93% | -41.66% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -49.93% | -9.67% | -40.26% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 16.92% | 4.53% | +12.39% |
Volatility
LVS vs. HLT - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Las Vegas Sands Corp. (LVS) is 5.91%, while Hilton Worldwide Holdings Inc. (HLT) has a volatility of 6.41%. This indicates that LVS experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than HLT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| LVS | HLT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.91% | 6.41% | -0.50% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 25.63% | 17.31% | +8.32% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 34.52% | 23.31% | +11.21% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 40.77% | 27.02% | +13.75% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 38.77% | 181.05% | -142.28% |
Dividends
LVS vs. HLT - Dividend Comparison
LVS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.40%, more than HLT's 0.19% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HLT Hilton Worldwide Holdings Inc. | 0.19% | 0.21% | 0.24% | 0.33% | 0.36% | 0.00% | 0.13% | 0.54% | 0.84% | 31.40% | 1.03% | 0.65% |
LVS Las Vegas Sands Corp. | 2.40% | 1.54% | 1.56% | 0.81% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 1.33% | 4.46% | 5.76% | 4.20% | 5.39% | 5.93% |
Financials
LVS vs. HLT - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Las Vegas Sands Corp. and Hilton Worldwide Holdings Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
LVS vs. HLT - Profitability Comparison
LVS - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Las Vegas Sands Corp. reported a gross profit of 1.04B and revenue of 3.59B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 29.0%.
HLT - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Hilton Worldwide Holdings Inc. reported a gross profit of 1.18B and revenue of 2.94B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 40.3%.
LVS - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Las Vegas Sands Corp. reported an operating income of 916.00M and revenue of 3.59B, resulting in an operating margin of 25.6%.
HLT - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Hilton Worldwide Holdings Inc. reported an operating income of 678.00M and revenue of 2.94B, resulting in an operating margin of 23.1%.
LVS - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Las Vegas Sands Corp. reported a net income of 567.00M and revenue of 3.59B, resulting in a net margin of 15.8%.
HLT - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Hilton Worldwide Holdings Inc. reported a net income of 385.00M and revenue of 2.94B, resulting in a net margin of 13.1%.
Frequently Asked Questions
LVS and HLT have a correlation of 0.31, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
HLT has higher volatility (6.41%) compared to LVS (5.91%). In terms of maximum drawdown, LVS dropped -99.02% vs HLT's -50.82%.
HLT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.71 vs -0.17), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for LVS and HLT
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer