PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
LVS vs. VOO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

LVS vs. VOO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Las Vegas Sands Corp. (LVS) and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LVS achieves a -21.00% return, which is significantly lower than VOO's 10.91% return. Over the past 10 years, LVS has underperformed VOO with an annualized return of 3.50%, while VOO has yielded a comparatively higher 15.56% annualized return.


LVS

1D
-0.68%
1M
-1.36%
YTD
-21.00%
6M
-23.11%
1Y
23.14%
3Y*
-2.96%
5Y*
-0.96%
10Y*
3.50%

VOO

1D
-0.70%
1M
5.04%
YTD
10.91%
6M
10.93%
1Y
28.04%
3Y*
22.44%
5Y*
13.90%
10Y*
15.56%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

LVS vs. VOO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
LVS
Las Vegas Sands Corp.
-21.00%29.45%6.21%3.15%27.71%-36.85%-11.95%39.54%-21.62%36.16%
VOO
Vanguard S&P 500 ETF
10.91%17.82%24.98%26.32%-18.17%28.79%18.32%31.37%-4.50%21.77%

Correlation

The correlation between LVS and VOO is 0.36, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.36

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.38

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.43

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.48

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 10, 2010

0.51

The correlation between LVS and VOO shifts across timeframes, from 0.36 (1 year) to 0.51 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

LVS vs. VOO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

LVS
LVS Risk / Return Rank: 5858
Overall Rank
LVS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6161
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LVS Sortino Ratio Rank: 5555
Sortino Ratio Rank
LVS Omega Ratio Rank: 5858
Omega Ratio Rank
LVS Calmar Ratio Rank: 5858
Calmar Ratio Rank
LVS Martin Ratio Rank: 5757
Martin Ratio Rank

VOO
VOO Risk / Return Rank: 7070
Overall Rank
VOO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7171
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VOO Sortino Ratio Rank: 7070
Sortino Ratio Rank
VOO Omega Ratio Rank: 7070
Omega Ratio Rank
VOO Calmar Ratio Rank: 6262
Calmar Ratio Rank
VOO Martin Ratio Rank: 7575
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

LVS vs. VOO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Las Vegas Sands Corp. (LVS) and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


LVSVOODifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.64

2.39

-1.75

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.07

3.25

-2.18

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.16

1.43

-0.28

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

0.83

3.16

-2.34

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

1.67

14.73

-13.06

LVS vs. VOO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current LVS Sharpe Ratio is 0.64, which is lower than the VOO Sharpe Ratio of 2.39. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LVS and VOO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


LVSVOODifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.64

2.39

-1.75

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.02

0.83

-0.85

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.09

0.87

-0.78

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.05

0.89

-0.84

Drawdowns

LVS vs. VOO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LVS drawdown since its inception was -99.02%, which is greater than VOO's maximum drawdown of -33.99%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LVS and VOO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


LVSVOODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-99.02%

-33.99%

-65.03%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-28.08%

-8.90%

-19.18%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-48.04%

-18.69%

-29.35%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-51.18%

-24.52%

-26.66%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-58.77%

-33.99%

-24.78%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-44.14%

-0.70%

-43.44%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-49.96%

-3.69%

-46.27%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

13.91%

1.91%

+12.00%

Volatility

LVS vs. VOO - Volatility Comparison

Las Vegas Sands Corp. (LVS) has a higher volatility of 8.65% compared to Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) at 2.84%. This indicates that LVS's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VOO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


LVSVOODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

8.65%

2.84%

+5.81%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

25.56%

8.90%

+16.66%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

36.53%

11.80%

+24.73%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

40.81%

16.81%

+24.00%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

38.87%

18.01%

+20.86%

Dividends

LVS vs. VOO - Dividend Comparison

LVS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.16%, more than VOO's 1.03% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
LVS
Las Vegas Sands Corp.
2.16%1.54%1.56%0.81%0.00%0.00%1.33%4.46%5.76%4.20%5.39%5.93%
VOO
Vanguard S&P 500 ETF
1.03%1.13%1.24%1.46%1.69%1.25%1.54%1.88%2.06%1.78%2.02%2.10%

Frequently Asked Questions


LVS and VOO have a correlation of 0.36, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

LVS has higher volatility (8.65%) compared to VOO (2.84%). In terms of maximum drawdown, LVS dropped -99.02% vs VOO's -33.99%.

VOO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.39 vs 0.64), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for LVS and VOO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer