PortfoliosLab logo
LVS vs. VOO
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Correlation

The correlation between LVS and VOO is 0.52, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


-0.50.00.51.0
Correlation: 0.5

Performance

LVS vs. VOO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Las Vegas Sands Corp. (LVS) and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

0.00%100.00%200.00%300.00%400.00%500.00%600.00%NovemberDecember2025FebruaryMarchApril
75.24%
557.08%
LVS
VOO

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

LVS:

-0.57

VOO:

0.54

Sortino Ratio

LVS:

-0.67

VOO:

0.88

Omega Ratio

LVS:

0.92

VOO:

1.13

Calmar Ratio

LVS:

-0.30

VOO:

0.55

Martin Ratio

LVS:

-1.27

VOO:

2.27

Ulcer Index

LVS:

16.14%

VOO:

4.55%

Daily Std Dev

LVS:

36.18%

VOO:

19.19%

Max Drawdown

LVS:

-99.02%

VOO:

-33.99%

Current Drawdown

LVS:

-61.61%

VOO:

-9.90%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LVS achieves a -29.71% return, which is significantly lower than VOO's -5.74% return. Over the past 10 years, LVS has underperformed VOO with an annualized return of -0.99%, while VOO has yielded a comparatively higher 12.24% annualized return.


LVS

YTD

-29.71%

1M

-6.00%

6M

-31.31%

1Y

-19.49%

5Y*

-4.51%

10Y*

-0.99%

VOO

YTD

-5.74%

1M

-0.92%

6M

-4.28%

1Y

9.78%

5Y*

15.84%

10Y*

12.24%

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Risk-Adjusted Performance

LVS vs. VOO — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

LVS
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of LVS is 2323
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of LVS is 2121
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of LVS is 2020
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of LVS is 2222
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of LVS is 3333
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of LVS is 1717
Martin Ratio Rank

VOO
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of VOO is 6464
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of VOO is 6161
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of VOO is 6262
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of VOO is 6464
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of VOO is 6767
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of VOO is 6565
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

LVS vs. VOO - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Las Vegas Sands Corp. (LVS) and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


The chart of Sharpe ratio for LVS, currently valued at -0.57, compared to the broader market-2.00-1.000.001.002.003.00
LVS: -0.57
VOO: 0.54
The chart of Sortino ratio for LVS, currently valued at -0.67, compared to the broader market-6.00-4.00-2.000.002.004.00
LVS: -0.67
VOO: 0.88
The chart of Omega ratio for LVS, currently valued at 0.92, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.00
LVS: 0.92
VOO: 1.13
The chart of Calmar ratio for LVS, currently valued at -0.36, compared to the broader market0.001.002.003.004.005.00
LVS: -0.36
VOO: 0.55
The chart of Martin ratio for LVS, currently valued at -1.27, compared to the broader market-5.000.005.0010.0015.0020.00
LVS: -1.27
VOO: 2.27

The current LVS Sharpe Ratio is -0.57, which is lower than the VOO Sharpe Ratio of 0.54. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LVS and VOO, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio-1.000.001.002.003.004.00NovemberDecember2025FebruaryMarchApril
-0.57
0.54
LVS
VOO

Dividends

LVS vs. VOO - Dividend Comparison

LVS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.37%, more than VOO's 1.38% yield.


TTM20242023202220212020201920182017201620152014
LVS
Las Vegas Sands Corp.
2.37%1.56%0.81%0.00%0.00%1.33%4.46%5.76%4.20%5.39%5.93%3.44%
VOO
Vanguard S&P 500 ETF
1.38%1.24%1.46%1.69%1.25%1.54%1.88%2.06%1.78%2.02%2.10%1.85%

Drawdowns

LVS vs. VOO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LVS drawdown since its inception was -99.02%, which is greater than VOO's maximum drawdown of -33.99%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LVS and VOO. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-60.00%-50.00%-40.00%-30.00%-20.00%-10.00%0.00%NovemberDecember2025FebruaryMarchApril
-49.37%
-9.90%
LVS
VOO

Volatility

LVS vs. VOO - Volatility Comparison

Las Vegas Sands Corp. (LVS) has a higher volatility of 20.33% compared to Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) at 13.96%. This indicates that LVS's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VOO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


0.00%5.00%10.00%15.00%20.00%NovemberDecember2025FebruaryMarchApril
20.33%
13.96%
LVS
VOO