LVS vs. NVDA

Last updated Apr 2, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Las Vegas Sands Corp. (LVS) and NVIDIA Corporation (NVDA).

Performance

LVS vs. NVDA - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Las Vegas Sands Corp. (LVS) and NVIDIA Corporation (NVDA). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

LVS vs. NVDA - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
LVS Las Vegas Sands Corp.	-16.11%	29.45%	6.21%	3.15%	27.71%	-36.85%	-11.95%	39.54%	-21.62%	36.16%
NVDA NVIDIA Corporation	-5.76%	38.92%	171.25%	239.02%	-50.26%	125.48%	122.30%	76.94%	-30.82%	81.99%

Fundamentals

Market Cap LVS : $36.83B NVDA : $4.29T
EPS LVS : $2.37 NVDA : $4.90
PE Ratio LVS : 22.91 NVDA : 35.88
PEG Ratio LVS : 42.93 NVDA : 0.20
PS Ratio LVS : 2.86 NVDA : 19.95
PB Ratio LVS : 23.16 NVDA : 27.30
Total Revenue (TTM) LVS : $13.02B NVDA : $215.94B
Gross Profit (TTM) LVS : $3.67B NVDA : $153.46B
EBITDA (TTM) LVS : $4.50B NVDA : $144.55B

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LVS achieves a -16.11% return, which is significantly lower than NVDA's -5.76% return. Over the past 10 years, LVS has underperformed NVDA with an annualized return of 3.07%, while NVDA has yielded a comparatively higher 69.75% annualized return.

LVS

• 1D: 0.82%
• 1M: -3.62%
• YTD: -16.11%
• 6M: 0.10%
• 1Y: 41.64%
• 3Y*: -0.15%
• 5Y*: -1.56%
• 10Y*: 3.07%

NVDA

• 1D: 0.77%
• 1M: -3.68%
• YTD: -5.76%
• 6M: -6.13%
• 1Y: 59.59%
• 3Y*: 85.01%
• 5Y*: 66.40%
• 10Y*: 69.75%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Return for Risk

LVS vs. NVDA — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

LVS

LVS Risk / Return Rank: 72
LVS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 74
LVS Sortino Ratio Rank: 69
LVS Omega Ratio Rank: 72
LVS Calmar Ratio Rank: 73
LVS Martin Ratio Rank: 72

NVDA

NVDA Risk / Return Rank: 82
NVDA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 83
NVDA Sortino Ratio Rank: 80
NVDA Omega Ratio Rank: 77
NVDA Calmar Ratio Rank: 86
NVDA Martin Ratio Rank: 84

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

LVS vs. NVDA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Las Vegas Sands Corp. (LVS) and NVIDIA Corporation (NVDA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	LVS	NVDA	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	1.04	1.45	-0.40
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	1.57	2.14	-0.57
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.23	1.27	-0.04
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.72	3.08	-1.36
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	4.01	7.73	-3.72
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

LVS vs. NVDA - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current LVS Sharpe Ratio is 1.04, which is comparable to the NVDA Sharpe Ratio of 1.45. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LVS and NVDA, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	LVS	NVDA	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.04	1.45	-0.40
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	-0.04	1.29	-1.33
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.08	1.40	-1.32
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.05	0.61	-0.56

Correlation

The correlation between LVS and NVDA is 0.34, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.

Dividends

LVS vs. NVDA - Dividend Comparison

LVS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.93%, more than NVDA's 0.02% yield.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
LVS Las Vegas Sands Corp.	1.93%	1.54%	1.56%	0.81%	0.00%	0.00%	1.33%	4.46%	5.76%	4.20%	5.39%	5.93%
NVDA NVIDIA Corporation	0.02%	0.02%	0.03%	0.03%	0.11%	0.05%	0.12%	0.27%	0.46%	0.29%	0.45%	1.20%

Drawdowns

LVS vs. NVDA - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LVS drawdown since its inception was -99.02%, which is greater than NVDA's maximum drawdown of -89.72%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LVS and NVDA.

Drawdown Indicators

	LVS	NVDA	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-99.02%	-89.72%	-9.30%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-25.33%	-20.21%	-5.12%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-52.62%	-66.34%	+13.72%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-58.77%	-66.34%	+7.57%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-40.68%	-15.10%	-25.58%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-50.02%	-36.40%	-13.62%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	10.85%	8.05%	+2.80%

Volatility

LVS vs. NVDA - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Las Vegas Sands Corp. (LVS) is 8.10%, while NVIDIA Corporation (NVDA) has a volatility of 10.43%. This indicates that LVS experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than NVDA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	LVS	NVDA	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	8.10%	10.43%	-2.33%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	29.09%	25.79%	+3.30%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	40.12%	41.42%	-1.30%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	40.69%	51.72%	-11.03%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	38.84%	49.84%	-11.00%

Financials

LVS vs. NVDA - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Las Vegas Sands Corp. and NVIDIA Corporation over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

LVS - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Las Vegas Sands Corp. reported a gross profit of 746.00M and revenue of 3.65B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 20.4%.

NVDA - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, NVIDIA Corporation reported a gross profit of 51.09B and revenue of 68.13B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 75.0%.

LVS - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Las Vegas Sands Corp. reported an operating income of 875.00M and revenue of 3.65B, resulting in an operating margin of 24.0%.

NVDA - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, NVIDIA Corporation reported an operating income of 44.30B and revenue of 68.13B, resulting in an operating margin of 65.0%.

LVS - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Las Vegas Sands Corp. reported a net income of 395.00M and revenue of 3.65B, resulting in a net margin of 10.8%.

NVDA - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, NVIDIA Corporation reported a net income of 42.96B and revenue of 68.13B, resulting in a net margin of 63.1%.