LVS vs. BJK
Compare and contrast key facts about Las Vegas Sands Corp. (LVS) and VanEck Vectors Gaming ETF (BJK).
BJK is a passively managed fund by VanEck that tracks the performance of the S-Network Global Gaming Index. It was launched on Jan 22, 2008.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: LVS or BJK.
Correlation
The correlation between LVS and BJK is 0.67, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Performance
LVS vs. BJK - Performance Comparison
Key characteristics
LVS:
0.20
BJK:
-0.07
LVS:
0.50
BJK:
0.04
LVS:
1.06
BJK:
1.00
LVS:
0.10
BJK:
-0.04
LVS:
0.38
BJK:
-0.18
LVS:
15.72%
BJK:
6.77%
LVS:
29.63%
BJK:
19.07%
LVS:
-99.02%
BJK:
-71.13%
LVS:
-45.46%
BJK:
-24.20%
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, LVS achieves a 6.04% return, which is significantly higher than BJK's -0.85% return. Over the past 10 years, LVS has underperformed BJK with an annualized return of 1.99%, while BJK has yielded a comparatively higher 3.04% annualized return.
LVS
6.04%
4.27%
16.01%
9.74%
-4.80%
1.99%
BJK
-0.85%
-4.05%
2.47%
0.53%
0.91%
3.04%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
LVS vs. BJK - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Las Vegas Sands Corp. (LVS) and VanEck Vectors Gaming ETF (BJK). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
LVS vs. BJK - Dividend Comparison
LVS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.56%, while BJK has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LVS Las Vegas Sands Corp. | 1.56% | 0.81% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 1.33% | 4.46% | 5.76% | 4.20% | 5.39% | 5.93% | 3.44% | 1.78% |
BJK VanEck Vectors Gaming ETF | 0.00% | 1.68% | 0.44% | 0.79% | 0.47% | 2.95% | 3.43% | 2.31% | 3.15% | 4.09% | 4.90% | 0.97% |
Drawdowns
LVS vs. BJK - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum LVS drawdown since its inception was -99.02%, which is greater than BJK's maximum drawdown of -71.13%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LVS and BJK. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
LVS vs. BJK - Volatility Comparison
Las Vegas Sands Corp. (LVS) has a higher volatility of 9.41% compared to VanEck Vectors Gaming ETF (BJK) at 4.92%. This indicates that LVS's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BJK based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.