PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
LVS vs. GE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

LVS vs. GE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Las Vegas Sands Corp. (LVS) and General Electric Company (GE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LVS achieves a -21.00% return, which is significantly lower than GE's 2.29% return. Over the past 10 years, LVS has underperformed GE with an annualized return of 3.50%, while GE has yielded a comparatively higher 9.45% annualized return.


LVS

1D
-0.68%
1M
-1.36%
YTD
-21.00%
6M
-23.11%
1Y
23.14%
3Y*
-2.96%
5Y*
-0.96%
10Y*
3.50%

GE

1D
-0.97%
1M
12.16%
YTD
2.29%
6M
9.35%
1Y
27.10%
3Y*
55.85%
5Y*
35.86%
10Y*
9.45%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

LVS vs. GE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
LVS
Las Vegas Sands Corp.
-21.00%29.45%6.21%3.15%27.71%-36.85%-11.95%39.54%-21.62%36.16%
GE
General Electric Company
2.29%85.73%64.83%95.71%-10.92%9.69%-2.73%54.00%-55.39%-42.92%

Correlation

The correlation between LVS and GE is 0.16, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.16

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.21

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.34

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.35

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 16, 2004

0.39

Over the past year, the correlation between LVS and GE has dropped to 0.16 - well below their long-term average of 0.39, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

LVS:

$34.13B

GE:

$330.11B

EPS

LVS:

$2.70

GE:

$8.15

PE Ratio

LVS:

18.84

GE:

38.60

PEG Ratio

LVS:

35.30

GE:

0.01

PS Ratio

LVS:

2.53

GE:

6.91

PB Ratio

LVS:

28.49

GE:

18.28

Total Revenue (TTM)

LVS:

$13.74B

GE:

$48.35B

Gross Profit (TTM)

LVS:

$3.67B

GE:

$16.84B

EBITDA (TTM)

LVS:

$4.76B

GE:

$11.01B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

LVS vs. GE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

LVS
LVS Risk / Return Rank: 5858
Overall Rank
LVS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6161
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LVS Sortino Ratio Rank: 5555
Sortino Ratio Rank
LVS Omega Ratio Rank: 5858
Omega Ratio Rank
LVS Calmar Ratio Rank: 5858
Calmar Ratio Rank
LVS Martin Ratio Rank: 5757
Martin Ratio Rank

GE
GE Risk / Return Rank: 6565
Overall Rank
GE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6868
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GE Sortino Ratio Rank: 6161
Sortino Ratio Rank
GE Omega Ratio Rank: 6060
Omega Ratio Rank
GE Calmar Ratio Rank: 6666
Calmar Ratio Rank
GE Martin Ratio Rank: 6868
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

LVS vs. GE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Las Vegas Sands Corp. (LVS) and General Electric Company (GE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


LVSGEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.24

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.26

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.16

1.17

-0.01

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.83

1.31

-0.48

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

1.67

3.50

-1.84

LVS vs. GE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current LVS Sharpe Ratio is 0.64, which is comparable to the GE Sharpe Ratio of 0.88. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LVS and GE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


LVSGEDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.64

0.88

-0.24

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.02

1.16

-1.19

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.09

0.26

-0.17

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.05

0.32

-0.27

Drawdowns

LVS vs. GE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LVS drawdown since its inception was -99.02%, which is greater than GE's maximum drawdown of -85.53%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LVS and GE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


LVSGEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-99.02%

-85.53%

-13.49%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-28.08%

-20.85%

-7.23%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-48.04%

-21.36%

-26.68%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-51.18%

-45.05%

-6.13%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-58.77%

-81.18%

+22.41%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-44.14%

-8.86%

-35.28%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-49.96%

-25.79%

-24.17%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

13.91%

7.75%

+6.16%

Volatility

LVS vs. GE - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Las Vegas Sands Corp. (LVS) is 8.65%, while General Electric Company (GE) has a volatility of 10.90%. This indicates that LVS experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than GE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


LVSGEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

8.65%

10.90%

-2.25%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

25.56%

26.42%

-0.86%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

36.53%

31.07%

+5.46%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

40.81%

30.96%

+9.85%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

38.87%

36.30%

+2.57%

Dividends

LVS vs. GE - Dividend Comparison

LVS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.16%, more than GE's 0.49% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
GE
General Electric Company
0.49%0.47%0.67%0.25%0.38%0.34%0.37%4.12%4.89%4.81%2.94%2.95%
LVS
Las Vegas Sands Corp.
2.16%1.54%1.56%0.81%0.00%0.00%1.33%4.46%5.76%4.20%5.39%5.93%

Financials

LVS vs. GE - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Las Vegas Sands Corp. and General Electric Company. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.005.00B10.00B15.00B20.00B20222023202420252026
3.59B
12.39B
(LVS) Total Revenue
(GE) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

LVS vs. GE - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Las Vegas Sands Corp. and General Electric Company over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

0.0%10.0%20.0%30.0%40.0%20222023202420252026
29.0%
31.0%
Portfolio components
LVS - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Las Vegas Sands Corp. reported a gross profit of 1.04B and revenue of 3.59B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 29.0%.

GE - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, General Electric Company reported a gross profit of 3.85B and revenue of 12.39B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 31.0%.

LVS - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Las Vegas Sands Corp. reported an operating income of 916.00M and revenue of 3.59B, resulting in an operating margin of 25.6%.

GE - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, General Electric Company reported an operating income of 1.70B and revenue of 12.39B, resulting in an operating margin of 13.7%.

LVS - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Las Vegas Sands Corp. reported a net income of 567.00M and revenue of 3.59B, resulting in a net margin of 15.8%.

GE - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, General Electric Company reported a net income of 1.94B and revenue of 12.39B, resulting in a net margin of 15.6%.


Frequently Asked Questions


LVS and GE have a correlation of 0.16, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

GE has higher volatility (10.90%) compared to LVS (8.65%). In terms of maximum drawdown, LVS dropped -99.02% vs GE's -85.53%.

GE currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.88 vs 0.64), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for LVS and GE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer