BJK vs. BEDZ

In the year-to-date period, BJK achieves a -2.49% return, which is significantly higher than BEDZ's -8.56% return.

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

BJK has a 0.66% expense ratio, which is lower than BEDZ's 0.79% expense ratio.

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VanEck Vectors Gaming ETF (BJK) and AdvisorShares Hotel ETF (BEDZ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

The current BJK Sharpe Ratio is 0.17, which is lower than the BEDZ Sharpe Ratio of 0.43. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BJK and BEDZ, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

BJK's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.95%, while BEDZ has not paid dividends to shareholders.

The maximum BJK drawdown since its inception was -71.12%, which is greater than BEDZ's maximum drawdown of -29.96%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BJK and BEDZ.

VanEck Vectors Gaming ETF (BJK) and AdvisorShares Hotel ETF (BEDZ) have volatilities of 6.97% and 6.94%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.