BJK vs. QQQ
Compare and contrast key facts about VanEck Vectors Gaming ETF (BJK) and Invesco QQQ (QQQ).
BJK and QQQ are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. BJK is a passively managed fund by VanEck that tracks the performance of the S-Network Global Gaming Index. It was launched on Jan 22, 2008. QQQ is a passively managed fund by Invesco that tracks the performance of the NASDAQ-100 Index. It was launched on Mar 10, 1999. Both BJK and QQQ are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: BJK or QQQ.
Correlation
The correlation between BJK and QQQ is 0.58, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Performance
BJK vs. QQQ - Performance Comparison
Key characteristics
BJK:
0.07
QQQ:
1.64
BJK:
0.23
QQQ:
2.19
BJK:
1.03
QQQ:
1.30
BJK:
0.04
QQQ:
2.16
BJK:
0.21
QQQ:
7.79
BJK:
6.78%
QQQ:
3.76%
BJK:
19.00%
QQQ:
17.85%
BJK:
-71.13%
QQQ:
-82.98%
BJK:
-23.55%
QQQ:
-3.63%
Returns By Period
Over the past 10 years, BJK has underperformed QQQ with an annualized return of 3.08%, while QQQ has yielded a comparatively higher 18.36% annualized return.
BJK
0.00%
-2.96%
4.34%
-0.26%
1.08%
3.08%
QQQ
27.20%
3.08%
8.34%
27.81%
20.44%
18.36%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
BJK vs. QQQ - Expense Ratio Comparison
BJK has a 0.66% expense ratio, which is higher than QQQ's 0.20% expense ratio.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
BJK vs. QQQ - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VanEck Vectors Gaming ETF (BJK) and Invesco QQQ (QQQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
BJK vs. QQQ - Dividend Comparison
BJK has not paid dividends to shareholders, while QQQ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.43%.
| TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BJK VanEck Vectors Gaming ETF | 0.00% | 1.68% | 0.44% | 0.79% | 0.47% | 2.95% | 3.43% | 2.31% | 3.15% | 4.09% | 4.90% | 0.97% |
QQQ Invesco QQQ | 0.43% | 0.62% | 0.80% | 0.43% | 0.55% | 0.74% | 0.91% | 0.84% | 1.06% | 0.99% | 1.41% | 1.02% |
Drawdowns
BJK vs. QQQ - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BJK drawdown since its inception was -71.13%, smaller than the maximum QQQ drawdown of -82.98%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BJK and QQQ. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
BJK vs. QQQ - Volatility Comparison
VanEck Vectors Gaming ETF (BJK) and Invesco QQQ (QQQ) have volatilities of 5.03% and 5.29%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.