PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Risk Analysis
Optimization
Factor Model
See All Tools
Portfolio Analysis
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Discussions
BJK vs. BETZ
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Key characteristics


BJKBETZ
YTD Return1.42%2.95%
1Y Return1.23%13.35%
3Y Return (Ann)-5.77%-16.14%
Sharpe Ratio0.120.74
Daily Std Dev20.22%21.87%
Max Drawdown-71.13%-60.82%
Current Drawdown-22.47%-45.41%

Correlation

0.85
-1.001.00

The correlation between BJK and BETZ is 0.85, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.

Performance

BJK vs. BETZ - Performance Comparison

In the year-to-date period, BJK achieves a 1.42% return, which is significantly lower than BETZ's 2.95% return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.


-10.00%0.00%10.00%20.00%OctoberNovemberDecember2024FebruaryMarch
19.08%
11.59%
BJK
BETZ

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs


VanEck Vectors Gaming ETF

Roundhill Sports Betting & iGaming ETF

BJK vs. BETZ - Expense Ratio Comparison

BJK has a 0.66% expense ratio, which is lower than BETZ's 0.75% expense ratio.

BETZ
Roundhill Sports Betting & iGaming ETF
0.50%1.00%1.50%2.00%0.75%
0.50%1.00%1.50%2.00%0.66%

Risk-Adjusted Performance

BJK vs. BETZ - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VanEck Vectors Gaming ETF (BJK) and Roundhill Sports Betting & iGaming ETF (BETZ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Sharpe ratioSortino ratioOmega ratioCalmar ratioUlcer Index
BJK
VanEck Vectors Gaming ETF
0.12
BETZ
Roundhill Sports Betting & iGaming ETF
0.74

BJK vs. BETZ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BJK Sharpe Ratio is 0.12, which is lower than the BETZ Sharpe Ratio of 0.74. The chart below compares the 12-month rolling Sharpe Ratio of BJK and BETZ.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio-0.200.000.200.400.600.801.00OctoberNovemberDecember2024FebruaryMarch
0.12
0.74
BJK
BETZ

Dividends

BJK vs. BETZ - Dividend Comparison

BJK's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.66%, while BETZ has not paid dividends to shareholders.


TTM20232022202120202019201820172016201520142013
BJK
VanEck Vectors Gaming ETF
1.66%1.68%0.44%0.79%0.47%2.95%3.43%2.31%3.15%4.09%4.90%0.97%
BETZ
Roundhill Sports Betting & iGaming ETF
0.00%0.00%0.66%0.00%0.28%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Drawdowns

BJK vs. BETZ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BJK drawdown since its inception was -71.13%, which is greater than BETZ's maximum drawdown of -60.82%. The drawdown chart below compares losses from any high point along the way for BJK and BETZ


-60.00%-50.00%-40.00%-30.00%-20.00%OctoberNovemberDecember2024FebruaryMarch
-22.47%
-45.41%
BJK
BETZ

Volatility

BJK vs. BETZ - Volatility Comparison

VanEck Vectors Gaming ETF (BJK) has a higher volatility of 5.41% compared to Roundhill Sports Betting & iGaming ETF (BETZ) at 4.70%. This indicates that BJK's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BETZ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


4.00%5.00%6.00%7.00%8.00%9.00%10.00%OctoberNovemberDecember2024FebruaryMarch
5.41%
4.70%
BJK
BETZ