BETZ vs. BJK
Compare and contrast key facts about Roundhill Sports Betting & iGaming ETF (BETZ) and VanEck Vectors Gaming ETF (BJK).
BETZ and BJK are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. BETZ is a passively managed fund by Roundhill Investments that tracks the performance of the Roundhill Sports Betting & iGaming Index. It was launched on Jun 4, 2020. BJK is a passively managed fund by VanEck that tracks the performance of the S-Network Global Gaming Index. It was launched on Jan 22, 2008. Both BETZ and BJK are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: BETZ or BJK.
Key characteristics
| BETZ | BJK | |
|---|---|---|
| YTD Return | 17.30% | 12.39% |
| 1Y Return | 2.16% | 21.23% |
| 5Y Return (Ann) | 1.63% | -1.19% |
| 10Y Return (Ann) | 1.63% | 2.57% |
| Sharpe Ratio | 0.17 | 0.95 |
| Daily Std Dev | 32.93% | 27.49% |
| Max Drawdown | -60.82% | -71.12% |
Correlation
The correlation between BETZ and BJK is 0.85, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
BETZ vs. BJK - Performance Comparison
In the year-to-date period, BETZ achieves a 17.30% return, which is significantly higher than BJK's 12.39% return. Over the past 10 years, BETZ has underperformed BJK with an annualized return of 1.63%, while BJK has yielded a comparatively higher 2.57% annualized return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
BETZ vs. BJK - Dividend Comparison
BETZ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.57%, more than BJK's 0.39% yield.
| TTM | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | 2012 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BETZ Roundhill Sports Betting & iGaming ETF | 0.57% | 0.66% | 0.00% | 0.28% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
BJK VanEck Vectors Gaming ETF | 0.39% | 0.44% | 0.79% | 0.48% | 3.00% | 3.59% | 2.50% | 3.49% | 4.68% | 5.84% | 1.21% | 4.93% |
BETZ vs. BJK - Expense Ratio Comparison
BETZ vs. BJK - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Roundhill Sports Betting & iGaming ETF (BETZ) and VanEck Vectors Gaming ETF (BJK). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| Sharpe ratio | Sortino ratio | Omega ratio | Calmar ratio | Ulcer Index | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BETZ Roundhill Sports Betting & iGaming ETF | 0.17 | ||||
BJK VanEck Vectors Gaming ETF | 0.95 |
BETZ vs. BJK - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BETZ drawdown for the period was -57.46%, lower than the maximum BJK drawdown of -32.73%. The drawdown chart below compares losses from any high point along the way for BETZ and BJK
BETZ vs. BJK - Volatility Comparison
Roundhill Sports Betting & iGaming ETF (BETZ) has a higher volatility of 6.25% compared to VanEck Vectors Gaming ETF (BJK) at 5.13%. This indicates that BETZ's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BJK based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.