BJK vs. BETZ
Compare and contrast key facts about VanEck Vectors Gaming ETF (BJK) and Roundhill Sports Betting & iGaming ETF (BETZ).
BJK and BETZ are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. BJK is a passively managed fund by VanEck that tracks the performance of the S-Network Global Gaming Index. It was launched on Jan 22, 2008. BETZ is a passively managed fund by Roundhill Investments that tracks the performance of the Roundhill Sports Betting & iGaming Index. It was launched on Jun 4, 2020. Both BJK and BETZ are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: BJK or BETZ.
Correlation
The correlation between BJK and BETZ is 0.83, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Performance
BJK vs. BETZ - Performance Comparison
Key characteristics
BJK:
-0.07
BETZ:
0.50
BJK:
0.04
BETZ:
0.82
BJK:
1.00
BETZ:
1.10
BJK:
-0.04
BETZ:
0.19
BJK:
-0.18
BETZ:
1.81
BJK:
6.77%
BETZ:
5.30%
BJK:
19.07%
BETZ:
19.24%
BJK:
-71.13%
BETZ:
-60.82%
BJK:
-24.20%
BETZ:
-41.28%
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BJK achieves a -0.85% return, which is significantly lower than BETZ's 10.73% return.
BJK
-0.85%
-4.05%
2.47%
0.53%
0.91%
3.04%
BETZ
10.73%
-3.03%
11.63%
11.95%
N/A
N/A
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
BJK vs. BETZ - Expense Ratio Comparison
BJK has a 0.66% expense ratio, which is lower than BETZ's 0.75% expense ratio.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
BJK vs. BETZ - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VanEck Vectors Gaming ETF (BJK) and Roundhill Sports Betting & iGaming ETF (BETZ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
BJK vs. BETZ - Dividend Comparison
Neither BJK nor BETZ has paid dividends to shareholders.
| TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BJK VanEck Vectors Gaming ETF | 0.00% | 1.68% | 0.44% | 0.79% | 0.47% | 2.95% | 3.43% | 2.31% | 3.15% | 4.09% | 4.90% | 0.97% |
BETZ Roundhill Sports Betting & iGaming ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.66% | 0.00% | 0.27% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
BJK vs. BETZ - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BJK drawdown since its inception was -71.13%, which is greater than BETZ's maximum drawdown of -60.82%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BJK and BETZ. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
BJK vs. BETZ - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for VanEck Vectors Gaming ETF (BJK) is 4.92%, while Roundhill Sports Betting & iGaming ETF (BETZ) has a volatility of 5.37%. This indicates that BJK experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BETZ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.