LVLN vs. PFRL
LVLN (SPDR S&P Leveraged Loan ETF) and PFRL (PGIM Floating Rate Income ETF) are both Bank Loan funds. LVLN is passively managed, while PFRL is actively managed. A 0.54 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. LVLN charges 0.40%/yr vs 0.72%/yr for PFRL.
Performance
LVLN vs. PFRL - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, LVLN achieves a 0.80% return, which is significantly lower than PFRL's 1.95% return.
LVLN
- 1D
- -0.10%
- 1M
- 0.35%
- YTD
- 0.80%
- 6M
- 1.73%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
PFRL
- 1D
- -0.06%
- 1M
- 0.52%
- YTD
- 1.95%
- 6M
- 2.77%
- 1Y
- 6.40%
- 3Y*
- 8.73%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
LVLN vs. PFRL - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
LVLN SPDR S&P Leveraged Loan ETF | 0.80% | 1.20% |
PFRL PGIM Floating Rate Income ETF | 1.95% | 1.34% |
Correlation
The correlation between LVLN and PFRL is 0.54, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 19, 2025 | 0.54 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
LVLN vs. PFRL — Risk / Return Rank
LVLN
PFRL
LVLN vs. PFRL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR S&P Leveraged Loan ETF (LVLN) and PGIM Floating Rate Income ETF (PFRL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| LVLN | PFRL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 3.31 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.35 | 1.66 | -0.31 |
Drawdowns
LVLN vs. PFRL - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum LVLN drawdown since its inception was -2.34%, smaller than the maximum PFRL drawdown of -8.83%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LVLN and PFRL.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| LVLN | PFRL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -2.34% | -8.83% | +6.49% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -1.25% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -8.83% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.36% | -0.06% | -0.30% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.55% | -0.44% | -0.11% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 0.37% | — |
Volatility
LVLN vs. PFRL - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| LVLN | PFRL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 0.42% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 1.58% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.78% | 1.94% | +0.84% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 2.78% | 4.86% | -2.08% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 2.78% | 4.86% | -2.08% |
LVLN vs. PFRL - Expense Ratio Comparison
LVLN has a 0.40% expense ratio, which is lower than PFRL's 0.72% expense ratio.
Dividends
LVLN vs. PFRL - Dividend Comparison
LVLN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.72%, less than PFRL's 6.83% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LVLN SPDR S&P Leveraged Loan ETF | 3.72% | 0.49% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
PFRL PGIM Floating Rate Income ETF | 6.83% | 7.34% | 8.96% | 9.84% | 3.55% |
Frequently Asked Questions
LVLN and PFRL have a correlation of 0.54, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, LVLN is cheaper at 0.40% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
LVLN is cheaper with a 0.40% expense ratio, compared with 0.72% for PFRL.
PFRL has the higher dividend yield at 6.83%, compared with 3.72% for LVLN.
They also come from different issuers: State Street and PGIM. Their fees differ too: 0.40% for LVLN and 0.72% for PFRL.
Find the right allocation for LVLN and PFRL
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer