LVLN vs. SRLN
LVLN (SPDR S&P Leveraged Loan ETF) and SRLN (State Street Blackstone Senior Loan ETF) are both Bank Loan funds from State Street. LVLN is passively managed, while SRLN is actively managed. Their 0.53 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. LVLN charges 0.40%/yr vs 0.70%/yr for SRLN.
Performance
LVLN vs. SRLN - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, LVLN achieves a 1.57% return, which is significantly higher than SRLN's 1.38% return.
LVLN
- 1D
- -0.02%
- 1M
- 0.28%
- 6M
- 1.93%
- YTD
- 1.57%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- —
SRLN
- 1D
- 0.02%
- 1M
- 0.62%
- 6M
- 2.15%
- YTD
- 1.38%
- 1Y
- 4.61%
- 3Y*
- 7.15%
- 5Y*
- 4.79%
- 10Y*
- 4.51%
- ALL TIME*
- 3.80%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $48.60K | $55.46K | $264.53K | |
| $41.26M | $48.21M | $73.40M |
LVLN vs. SRLN - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
LVLN SPDR S&P Leveraged Loan ETF | 1.57% | 1.14% |
SRLN State Street Blackstone Senior Loan ETF | 1.38% | 1.41% |
Correlation
The correlation between LVLN and SRLN is 0.53, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 18, 2025 | 0.53 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
LVLN vs. SRLN — Risk / Return Rank
LVLN
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
SRLN
LVLN vs. SRLN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR S&P Leveraged Loan ETF (LVLN) and State Street Blackstone Senior Loan ETF (SRLN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| LVLN | SRLN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.32 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 1.34 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 4.95 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
LVLN vs. SRLN - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum LVLN drawdown since its inception was -2.34%, smaller than the maximum SRLN drawdown of -22.29%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LVLN and SRLN.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| LVLN | SRLN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -2.34% | -22.29% | +19.95% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -3.26% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -4.26% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -7.93% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -22.29% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.26% | -0.02% | -0.24% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.46% | -1.09% | +0.63% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 0.88% | — |
Volatility
LVLN vs. SRLN - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| LVLN | SRLN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 0.52% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 2.69% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.60% | 2.94% | -0.34% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 2.60% | 3.92% | -1.32% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 2.60% | 6.06% | -3.46% |
LVLN vs. SRLN - Expense Ratio Comparison
LVLN has a 0.40% expense ratio, which is lower than SRLN's 0.70% expense ratio.
Dividends
LVLN vs. SRLN - Dividend Comparison
LVLN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.31%, less than SRLN's 7.39% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LVLN SPDR S&P Leveraged Loan ETF | 4.31% | 0.49% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SRLN State Street Blackstone Senior Loan ETF | 6.72% | 7.67% | 8.58% | 8.44% | 5.72% | 4.45% | 4.91% | 5.39% | 4.98% | 4.01% | 3.94% | 4.43% |
Frequently Asked Questions
LVLN and SRLN have a correlation of 0.53, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, LVLN is cheaper at 0.40% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
LVLN is cheaper with a 0.40% expense ratio, compared with 0.70% for SRLN.
SRLN has the higher dividend yield at 6.72%, compared with 4.31% for LVLN.
Their fees differ too: 0.40% for LVLN and 0.70% for SRLN.
Find the right allocation for LVLN and SRLN
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer