LVLN vs. BRLN
LVLN (SPDR S&P Leveraged Loan ETF) and BRLN (BlackRock Floating Rate Loan ETF) are both Bank Loan funds. LVLN is passively managed, while BRLN is actively managed. At a 0.29 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. LVLN charges 0.40%/yr vs 0.55%/yr for BRLN.
Performance
LVLN vs. BRLN - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with LVLN having a 0.80% return and BRLN slightly lower at 0.79%.
LVLN
- 1D
- -0.10%
- 1M
- 0.35%
- YTD
- 0.80%
- 6M
- 1.73%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
BRLN
- 1D
- -0.65%
- 1M
- 0.16%
- YTD
- 0.79%
- 6M
- 1.42%
- 1Y
- 4.48%
- 3Y*
- 7.16%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
LVLN vs. BRLN - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
LVLN SPDR S&P Leveraged Loan ETF | 0.80% | 1.20% |
BRLN BlackRock Floating Rate Loan ETF | 0.79% | 1.39% |
Correlation
The correlation between LVLN and BRLN is 0.29, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 19, 2025 | 0.29 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
LVLN vs. BRLN — Risk / Return Rank
LVLN
BRLN
LVLN vs. BRLN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR S&P Leveraged Loan ETF (LVLN) and BlackRock Floating Rate Loan ETF (BRLN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| LVLN | BRLN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 1.44 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.35 | 2.13 | -0.78 |
Drawdowns
LVLN vs. BRLN - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum LVLN drawdown since its inception was -2.34%, smaller than the maximum BRLN drawdown of -3.85%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LVLN and BRLN.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| LVLN | BRLN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -2.34% | -3.85% | +1.51% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -2.00% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -3.85% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.36% | -0.76% | +0.40% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.55% | -0.31% | -0.24% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 0.52% | — |
Volatility
LVLN vs. BRLN - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| LVLN | BRLN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 1.05% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 2.33% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.78% | 3.13% | -0.35% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 2.78% | 3.74% | -0.96% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 2.78% | 3.74% | -0.96% |
LVLN vs. BRLN - Expense Ratio Comparison
LVLN has a 0.40% expense ratio, which is lower than BRLN's 0.55% expense ratio.
Dividends
LVLN vs. BRLN - Dividend Comparison
LVLN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.72%, less than BRLN's 6.39% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BRLN BlackRock Floating Rate Loan ETF | 6.39% | 6.50% | 7.87% | 9.06% | 1.48% |
LVLN SPDR S&P Leveraged Loan ETF | 3.72% | 0.49% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
LVLN and BRLN have a correlation of 0.29, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, LVLN is cheaper at 0.40% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
LVLN is cheaper with a 0.40% expense ratio, compared with 0.55% for BRLN.
BRLN has the higher dividend yield at 6.39%, compared with 3.72% for LVLN.
They also come from different issuers: State Street and BlackRock. Their fees differ too: 0.40% for LVLN and 0.55% for BRLN.
Find the right allocation for LVLN and BRLN
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer