PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PFRL vs. MSD
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

PFRL vs. MSD - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in PGIM Floating Rate Income ETF (PFRL) and Morgan Stanley Emerging Markets Debt Fund, Inc. (MSD). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

PFRL vs. MSD - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
PFRL
PGIM Floating Rate Income ETF
-0.51%6.25%9.40%13.75%1.27%
MSD
Morgan Stanley Emerging Markets Debt Fund, Inc.
-3.10%5.58%24.92%19.14%-2.80%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PFRL achieves a -0.51% return, which is significantly higher than MSD's -3.10% return.


PFRL

1D
0.12%
1M
0.48%
YTD
-0.51%
6M
1.06%
1Y
5.35%
3Y*
8.43%
5Y*
10Y*

MSD

1D
0.72%
1M
-7.36%
YTD
-3.10%
6M
-0.84%
1Y
-4.80%
3Y*
14.71%
5Y*
4.27%
10Y*
5.35%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PFRL vs. MSD — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PFRL
PFRL Risk / Return Rank: 4848
Overall Rank
PFRL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3535
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PFRL Sortino Ratio Rank: 2727
Sortino Ratio Rank
PFRL Omega Ratio Rank: 8686
Omega Ratio Rank
PFRL Calmar Ratio Rank: 2929
Calmar Ratio Rank
PFRL Martin Ratio Rank: 6363
Martin Ratio Rank

MSD
MSD Risk / Return Rank: 2828
Overall Rank
MSD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2525
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MSD Sortino Ratio Rank: 2222
Sortino Ratio Rank
MSD Omega Ratio Rank: 2121
Omega Ratio Rank
MSD Calmar Ratio Rank: 3636
Calmar Ratio Rank
MSD Martin Ratio Rank: 3434
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PFRL vs. MSD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for PGIM Floating Rate Income ETF (PFRL) and Morgan Stanley Emerging Markets Debt Fund, Inc. (MSD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


PFRLMSDDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.63

-0.36

+0.99

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

0.77

-0.38

+1.15

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.34

0.94

+0.39

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

0.67

-0.20

+0.87

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

6.10

-0.52

+6.62

PFRL vs. MSD - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PFRL Sharpe Ratio is 0.63, which is higher than the MSD Sharpe Ratio of -0.36. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PFRL and MSD, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


PFRLMSDDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.63

-0.36

+0.99

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.31

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.37

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.57

0.35

+1.22

Correlation

The correlation between PFRL and MSD is 0.25, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


Dividends

PFRL vs. MSD - Dividend Comparison

PFRL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.83%, less than MSD's 9.26% yield.


TTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
PFRL
PGIM Floating Rate Income ETF
7.83%7.34%8.96%9.84%3.55%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
MSD
Morgan Stanley Emerging Markets Debt Fund, Inc.
9.26%9.88%11.88%10.90%7.34%4.99%4.67%5.37%6.56%5.81%6.87%7.03%

Drawdowns

PFRL vs. MSD - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PFRL drawdown since its inception was -8.83%, smaller than the maximum MSD drawdown of -58.51%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PFRL and MSD.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


PFRLMSDDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-8.83%

-58.51%

+49.68%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.87%

-12.84%

+4.97%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-33.89%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-37.50%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.78%

-9.70%

+8.92%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.46%

-11.33%

+10.87%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.86%

5.08%

-4.22%

Volatility

PFRL vs. MSD - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for PGIM Floating Rate Income ETF (PFRL) is 0.74%, while Morgan Stanley Emerging Markets Debt Fund, Inc. (MSD) has a volatility of 4.88%. This indicates that PFRL experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than MSD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


PFRLMSDDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.74%

4.88%

-4.14%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

1.61%

7.28%

-5.67%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

8.53%

13.51%

-4.98%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

4.96%

13.92%

-8.96%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

4.96%

14.67%

-9.71%