LVLN vs. BKLN
LVLN (SPDR S&P Leveraged Loan ETF) and BKLN (Invesco Senior Loan ETF) are both Bank Loan funds - LVLN tracks the S&P USD Select Leveraged Loan Index while BKLN tracks the Morningstar LSTA US Leveraged Loan 100 Index. Both are passively managed. At a 0.46 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. LVLN charges 0.40%/yr vs 0.65%/yr for BKLN.
Performance
LVLN vs. BKLN - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, LVLN achieves a 1.02% return, which is significantly higher than BKLN's -0.03% return.
LVLN
- 1D
- -0.10%
- 1M
- 0.07%
- YTD
- 1.02%
- 6M
- 1.53%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
BKLN
- 1D
- 0.01%
- 1M
- -0.04%
- YTD
- -0.03%
- 6M
- 0.26%
- 1Y
- 4.45%
- 3Y*
- 7.23%
- 5Y*
- 5.17%
- 10Y*
- 4.33%
LVLN vs. BKLN - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
LVLN SPDR S&P Leveraged Loan ETF | 1.02% | 1.14% |
BKLN Invesco Senior Loan ETF | -0.03% | 1.31% |
Correlation
The correlation between LVLN and BKLN is 0.46, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 18, 2025 | 0.46 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
LVLN vs. BKLN — Risk / Return Rank
LVLN
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
BKLN
LVLN vs. BKLN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR S&P Leveraged Loan ETF (LVLN) and Invesco Senior Loan ETF (BKLN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| LVLN | BKLN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.37 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 1.45 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 5.68 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
LVLN vs. BKLN - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum LVLN drawdown since its inception was -2.34%, smaller than the maximum BKLN drawdown of -24.17%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LVLN and BKLN.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| LVLN | BKLN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -2.34% | -24.17% | +21.83% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -3.07% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -3.55% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -7.31% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -24.17% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.14% | -0.47% | +0.33% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.53% | -1.09% | +0.56% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 0.78% | — |
Volatility
LVLN vs. BKLN - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| LVLN | BKLN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 0.53% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 2.54% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.71% | 2.77% | -0.06% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 2.71% | 4.48% | -1.77% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 2.71% | 6.43% | -3.72% |
LVLN vs. BKLN - Expense Ratio Comparison
LVLN has a 0.40% expense ratio, which is lower than BKLN's 0.65% expense ratio.
Dividends
LVLN vs. BKLN - Dividend Comparison
LVLN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.71%, less than BKLN's 7.16% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BKLN Invesco Senior Loan ETF | 7.16% | 6.95% | 8.41% | 8.59% | 4.93% | 3.11% | 3.56% | 4.86% | 4.52% | 3.50% | 4.54% | 4.12% |
LVLN SPDR S&P Leveraged Loan ETF | 3.71% | 0.49% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
LVLN and BKLN have a correlation of 0.46, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, LVLN is cheaper at 0.40% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
LVLN is cheaper with a 0.40% expense ratio, compared with 0.65% for BKLN.
BKLN has the higher dividend yield at 7.16%, compared with 3.71% for LVLN.
LVLN tracks S&P USD Select Leveraged Loan Index, while BKLN tracks Morningstar LSTA US Leveraged Loan 100 Index. They also come from different issuers: State Street and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.40% for LVLN and 0.65% for BKLN.
Find the right allocation for LVLN and BKLN
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer