PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PFRL vs. HIGH
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

PFRL vs. HIGH - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in PGIM Floating Rate Income ETF (PFRL) and Simplify Enhanced Income ETF (HIGH). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PFRL achieves a 2.31% return, which is significantly higher than HIGH's 0.03% return.


PFRL

1D
-0.02%
1M
0.49%
YTD
2.31%
6M
2.78%
1Y
6.38%
3Y*
8.48%
5Y*
10Y*

HIGH

1D
0.32%
1M
0.92%
YTD
0.03%
6M
-0.19%
1Y
-0.59%
3Y*
3.00%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PFRL vs. HIGH - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
PFRL
PGIM Floating Rate Income ETF
2.31%6.25%9.40%13.75%1.92%
HIGH
Simplify Enhanced Income ETF
0.03%4.35%1.52%7.70%0.47%

Correlation

The correlation between PFRL and HIGH is 0.24, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.24

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.21

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 28, 2022

0.18

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PFRL vs. HIGH — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PFRL
PFRL Risk / Return Rank: 9292
Overall Rank
PFRL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9494
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PFRL Sortino Ratio Rank: 9595
Sortino Ratio Rank
PFRL Omega Ratio Rank: 9595
Omega Ratio Rank
PFRL Calmar Ratio Rank: 8989
Calmar Ratio Rank
PFRL Martin Ratio Rank: 8686
Martin Ratio Rank

HIGH
HIGH Risk / Return Rank: 88
Overall Rank
HIGH Sharpe Ratio Rank: 88
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HIGH Sortino Ratio Rank: 77
Sortino Ratio Rank
HIGH Omega Ratio Rank: 77
Omega Ratio Rank
HIGH Calmar Ratio Rank: 88
Calmar Ratio Rank
HIGH Martin Ratio Rank: 88
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PFRL vs. HIGH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for PGIM Floating Rate Income ETF (PFRL) and Simplify Enhanced Income ETF (HIGH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


PFRLHIGHDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+3.39

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+4.84

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.73

1.00

+0.73

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

5.11

-0.06

+5.17

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

17.36

-0.09

+17.45

PFRL vs. HIGH - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PFRL Sharpe Ratio is 3.33, which is higher than the HIGH Sharpe Ratio of -0.07. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PFRL and HIGH, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

PFRL vs. HIGH - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PFRL drawdown since its inception was -8.83%, smaller than the maximum HIGH drawdown of -9.50%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PFRL and HIGH.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PFRLHIGHDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-8.83%

-9.50%

+0.67%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-1.25%

-9.50%

+8.25%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-8.83%

-9.50%

+0.67%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.02%

-6.74%

+6.72%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.43%

-2.44%

+2.01%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.37%

6.71%

-6.34%

Volatility

PFRL vs. HIGH - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for PGIM Floating Rate Income ETF (PFRL) is 0.50%, while Simplify Enhanced Income ETF (HIGH) has a volatility of 1.71%. This indicates that PFRL experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than HIGH based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PFRLHIGHDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.50%

1.71%

-1.21%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

1.61%

3.73%

-2.12%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.93%

8.77%

-6.84%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

4.83%

9.53%

-4.70%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

4.83%

9.53%

-4.70%

PFRL vs. HIGH - Expense Ratio Comparison

PFRL has a 0.72% expense ratio, which is higher than HIGH's 0.51% expense ratio.


Dividends

PFRL vs. HIGH - Dividend Comparison

PFRL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.81%, less than HIGH's 7.30% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022
HIGH
Simplify Enhanced Income ETF
7.30%7.71%8.34%9.40%0.62%
PFRL
PGIM Floating Rate Income ETF
6.81%7.34%8.96%9.84%3.55%

Frequently Asked Questions


PFRL and HIGH have a correlation of 0.24, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

HIGH has higher volatility (1.71%) compared to PFRL (0.50%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PFRL dropped -8.83% vs HIGH's -9.50%.

On 3-year performance, PFRL leads with 8.48% vs 3.00% for HIGH. On fees, HIGH is cheaper at 0.51% per year. On volatility, PFRL has been the lower-risk option at 0.50%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 3-year period, PFRL has performed better with a 8.48% return vs 3.00%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

HIGH is cheaper with a 0.51% expense ratio, compared with 0.72% for PFRL.

HIGH has the higher dividend yield at 7.30%, compared with 6.81% for PFRL.

PFRL is categorized as Bank Loan, while HIGH is Derivative Income. They also come from different issuers: PGIM and Simplify. Their fees differ too: 0.72% for PFRL and 0.51% for HIGH.

PFRL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.33 vs -0.07), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PFRL and HIGH

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer