PFRL vs. CLOZ
Compare and contrast key facts about PGIM Floating Rate Income ETF (PFRL) and Panagram Bbb-B Clo ETF (CLOZ).
PFRL and CLOZ are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. PFRL is an actively managed fund by PGIM. It was launched on May 17, 2022. CLOZ is an actively managed fund by Panagram. It was launched on Jan 23, 2023.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: PFRL or CLOZ.
Key characteristics
| PFRL | CLOZ | |
|---|---|---|
| YTD Return | 8.50% | 10.34% |
| 1Y Return | 11.22% | 13.39% |
| Sharpe Ratio | 5.57 | 6.18 |
| Sortino Ratio | 8.81 | 9.15 |
| Omega Ratio | 2.50 | 3.14 |
| Calmar Ratio | 11.18 | 9.82 |
| Martin Ratio | 78.83 | 59.62 |
| Ulcer Index | 0.15% | 0.23% |
| Daily Std Dev | 2.07% | 2.20% |
| Max Drawdown | -3.27% | -2.70% |
| Current Drawdown | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Correlation
The correlation between PFRL and CLOZ is 0.16, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Performance
PFRL vs. CLOZ - Performance Comparison
In the year-to-date period, PFRL achieves a 8.50% return, which is significantly lower than CLOZ's 10.34% return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
PFRL vs. CLOZ - Expense Ratio Comparison
PFRL has a 0.72% expense ratio, which is higher than CLOZ's 0.50% expense ratio.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
PFRL vs. CLOZ - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for PGIM Floating Rate Income ETF (PFRL) and Panagram Bbb-B Clo ETF (CLOZ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
PFRL vs. CLOZ - Dividend Comparison
PFRL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 9.31%, more than CLOZ's 9.01% yield.
| TTM | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|
PFRL PGIM Floating Rate Income ETF | 9.31% | 9.84% | 3.55% |
CLOZ Panagram Bbb-B Clo ETF | 9.01% | 8.81% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
PFRL vs. CLOZ - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PFRL drawdown since its inception was -3.27%, which is greater than CLOZ's maximum drawdown of -2.70%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PFRL and CLOZ. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
PFRL vs. CLOZ - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for PGIM Floating Rate Income ETF (PFRL) is 0.48%, while Panagram Bbb-B Clo ETF (CLOZ) has a volatility of 0.51%. This indicates that PFRL experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CLOZ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.