PFRL vs. CLOZ

Last updated Jun 23, 2026

PFRL (PGIM Floating Rate Income ETF) and CLOZ (Panagram BBB-B CLO ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - PFRL is a Bank Loan fund actively managed by PGIM, while CLOZ is a CLO fund actively managed by Panagram. Both are actively managed. Over the past 3 years, PFRL returned 8.48%/yr vs 9.99%/yr for CLOZ. At a 0.20 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. PFRL charges 0.72%/yr vs 0.50%/yr for CLOZ.

Performance

PFRL vs. CLOZ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in PGIM Floating Rate Income ETF (PFRL) and Panagram BBB-B CLO ETF (CLOZ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with PFRL having a 2.31% return and CLOZ slightly lower at 2.26%.

PFRL

• 1D: -0.02%
• 1M: 0.49%
• YTD: 2.31%
• 6M: 2.78%
• 1Y: 6.38%
• 3Y*: 8.48%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

CLOZ

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: -0.17%
• YTD: 2.26%
• 6M: 2.50%
• 1Y: 5.55%
• 3Y*: 9.99%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PFRL vs. CLOZ - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023
PFRL PGIM Floating Rate Income ETF	2.31%	6.25%	9.40%	10.93%
CLOZ Panagram BBB-B CLO ETF	2.26%	5.99%	11.85%	14.99%

Correlation

The correlation between PFRL and CLOZ is 0.27, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.27
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.20
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 24, 2023	0.20

Return for Risk

PFRL vs. CLOZ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PFRL

PFRL Risk / Return Rank: 92
PFRL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 94
PFRL Sortino Ratio Rank: 95
PFRL Omega Ratio Rank: 95
PFRL Calmar Ratio Rank: 89
PFRL Martin Ratio Rank: 86

CLOZ

CLOZ Risk / Return Rank: 44
CLOZ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 48
CLOZ Sortino Ratio Rank: 41
CLOZ Omega Ratio Rank: 70
CLOZ Calmar Ratio Rank: 30
CLOZ Martin Ratio Rank: 33

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PFRL vs. CLOZ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for PGIM Floating Rate Income ETF (PFRL) and Panagram BBB-B CLO ETF (CLOZ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	PFRL	CLOZ	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	3.33	1.61	+1.72
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	4.81	2.06	+2.75
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.73	1.40	+0.33
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	5.11	1.43	+3.68
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	17.36	4.74	+12.62

PFRL vs. CLOZ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PFRL Sharpe Ratio is 3.33, which is higher than the CLOZ Sharpe Ratio of 1.61. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PFRL and CLOZ, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

PFRL vs. CLOZ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PFRL drawdown since its inception was -8.83%, which is greater than CLOZ's maximum drawdown of -5.32%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PFRL and CLOZ.

Drawdown Indicators

	PFRL	CLOZ	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-8.83%	-5.32%	-3.51%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-1.25%	-3.90%	+2.65%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-8.83%	-5.32%	-3.51%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.02%	-0.38%	+0.36%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-0.43%	-0.38%	-0.05%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.37%	1.17%	-0.80%

Volatility

PFRL vs. CLOZ - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for PGIM Floating Rate Income ETF (PFRL) is 0.50%, while Panagram BBB-B CLO ETF (CLOZ) has a volatility of 0.66%. This indicates that PFRL experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CLOZ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	PFRL	CLOZ	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	0.50%	0.66%	-0.16%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	1.61%	3.17%	-1.56%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.93%	3.47%	-1.54%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	4.83%	3.79%	+1.04%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	4.83%	3.79%	+1.04%

PFRL vs. CLOZ - Expense Ratio Comparison

PFRL has a 0.72% expense ratio, which is higher than CLOZ's 0.50% expense ratio.

Dividends

PFRL vs. CLOZ - Dividend Comparison

PFRL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.81%, less than CLOZ's 7.41% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022
CLOZ Panagram BBB-B CLO ETF	7.41%	7.63%	9.09%	8.81%	0.00%
PFRL PGIM Floating Rate Income ETF	6.81%	7.34%	8.96%	9.84%	3.55%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both PFRL and CLOZ in my portfolio?

PFRL and CLOZ have a correlation of 0.27, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, PFRL or CLOZ?

CLOZ has higher volatility (0.66%) compared to PFRL (0.50%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PFRL dropped -8.83% vs CLOZ's -5.32%.

Which ETF is better, PFRL or CLOZ?

On 3-year performance, CLOZ leads with 9.99% vs 8.48% for PFRL. On fees, CLOZ is cheaper at 0.50% per year. On volatility, PFRL has been the lower-risk option at 0.50%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, PFRL or CLOZ?

Over the 3-year period, CLOZ has performed better with a 9.99% return vs 8.48%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, PFRL or CLOZ?

CLOZ is cheaper with a 0.50% expense ratio, compared with 0.72% for PFRL.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, PFRL or CLOZ?

CLOZ has the higher dividend yield at 7.41%, compared with 6.81% for PFRL.

What is the main difference between PFRL and CLOZ?

PFRL is categorized as Bank Loan, while CLOZ is CLO. They also come from different issuers: PGIM and Panagram. Their fees differ too: 0.72% for PFRL and 0.50% for CLOZ.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

PFRL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.33 vs 1.61), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.