PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
LVHI vs. LVHD
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

LVHI vs. LVHD - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Franklin International Low Volatility High Dividend Index ETF (LVHI) and Legg Mason Low Volatility High Dividend ETF (LVHD). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LVHI achieves a 11.03% return, which is significantly higher than LVHD's 8.83% return.


LVHI

1D
-0.94%
1M
-1.04%
YTD
11.03%
6M
13.12%
1Y
29.65%
3Y*
20.66%
5Y*
15.66%
10Y*

LVHD

1D
1.47%
1M
0.76%
YTD
8.83%
6M
9.15%
1Y
12.66%
3Y*
9.98%
5Y*
6.47%
10Y*
8.20%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

LVHI vs. LVHD - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
LVHI
Franklin International Low Volatility High Dividend Index ETF
11.03%27.12%14.81%17.45%3.84%18.19%-8.76%18.35%-5.22%12.26%
LVHD
Legg Mason Low Volatility High Dividend ETF
8.83%7.50%10.18%-0.95%-1.82%26.90%-1.28%22.91%-5.58%14.25%

Correlation

The correlation between LVHI and LVHD is 0.49, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.49

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.53

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.59

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 29, 2016

0.53

The correlation between LVHI and LVHD has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.49 to 0.59 - a consistent structural relationship.

LVHI vs. LVHD - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
LVHI
LVHD

Financial Services

23.6%
8.6%

Energy

17.4%
6.7%

Industrials

13.4%
4.6%

Utilities

10.4%
25.5%

Consumer Defensive

8.7%
18.5%

Healthcare

7.4%
4.6%

Basic Materials

6.1%

-

Communication Services

5.8%
3.8%

Consumer Cyclical

5.3%
6.8%

Real Estate

1.9%
15.0%

Technology

0.1%
5.9%

Financial Services

LVHI
23.6%
LVHD
8.6%

Energy

LVHI
17.4%
LVHD
6.7%

Industrials

LVHI
13.4%
LVHD
4.6%

Utilities

LVHI
10.4%
LVHD
25.5%

Consumer Defensive

LVHI
8.7%
LVHD
18.5%

Healthcare

LVHI
7.4%
LVHD
4.6%

Basic Materials

LVHI
6.1%
LVHD

-

Communication Services

LVHI
5.8%
LVHD
3.8%

Consumer Cyclical

LVHI
5.3%
LVHD
6.8%

Real Estate

LVHI
1.9%
LVHD
15.0%

Technology

LVHI
0.1%
LVHD
5.9%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

LVHI vs. LVHD — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

LVHI
LVHI Risk / Return Rank: 9090
Overall Rank
LVHI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9191
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LVHI Sortino Ratio Rank: 9292
Sortino Ratio Rank
LVHI Omega Ratio Rank: 9191
Omega Ratio Rank
LVHI Calmar Ratio Rank: 8787
Calmar Ratio Rank
LVHI Martin Ratio Rank: 9090
Martin Ratio Rank

LVHD
LVHD Risk / Return Rank: 3838
Overall Rank
LVHD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3838
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LVHD Sortino Ratio Rank: 3939
Sortino Ratio Rank
LVHD Omega Ratio Rank: 3535
Omega Ratio Rank
LVHD Calmar Ratio Rank: 4343
Calmar Ratio Rank
LVHD Martin Ratio Rank: 3535
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

LVHI vs. LVHD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Franklin International Low Volatility High Dividend Index ETF (LVHI) and Legg Mason Low Volatility High Dividend ETF (LVHD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


LVHILVHDDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.81

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+2.33

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.59

1.23

+0.36

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.90

2.06

+2.84

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

20.31

5.20

+15.11

LVHI vs. LVHD - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current LVHI Sharpe Ratio is 3.14, which is higher than the LVHD Sharpe Ratio of 1.32. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LVHI and LVHD, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


LVHILVHDDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.14

1.32

+1.81

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

1.42

0.50

+0.92

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.53

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.81

0.58

+0.24

Drawdowns

LVHI vs. LVHD - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LVHI drawdown since its inception was -32.31%, smaller than the maximum LVHD drawdown of -37.32%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LVHI and LVHD.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


LVHILVHDDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-32.31%

-37.32%

+5.01%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.08%

-6.17%

+0.09%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-11.99%

-14.29%

+2.30%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-11.99%

-16.75%

+4.76%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-37.32%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.16%

-2.96%

+0.80%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.52%

-4.05%

+0.53%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.46%

2.44%

-0.98%

Volatility

LVHI vs. LVHD - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Franklin International Low Volatility High Dividend Index ETF (LVHI) is 2.91%, while Legg Mason Low Volatility High Dividend ETF (LVHD) has a volatility of 3.23%. This indicates that LVHI experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than LVHD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


LVHILVHDDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.91%

3.23%

-0.32%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.57%

6.76%

+0.81%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

9.49%

9.61%

-0.12%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

11.06%

12.88%

-1.82%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

13.76%

15.51%

-1.75%

LVHI vs. LVHD - Expense Ratio Comparison

LVHI has a 0.40% expense ratio, which is higher than LVHD's 0.27% expense ratio.


Dividends

LVHI vs. LVHD - Dividend Comparison

LVHI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.80%, more than LVHD's 3.34% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019201820172016
LVHD
Legg Mason Low Volatility High Dividend ETF
3.34%3.35%4.23%3.55%3.30%2.56%3.27%3.30%3.82%3.33%2.48%
LVHI
Franklin International Low Volatility High Dividend Index ETF
4.80%4.92%3.98%8.12%7.74%4.13%3.97%6.67%10.67%3.38%2.02%

Frequently Asked Questions


LVHI and LVHD have a correlation of 0.49, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

LVHD has higher volatility (3.23%) compared to LVHI (2.91%). In terms of maximum drawdown, LVHI dropped -32.31% vs LVHD's -37.32%.

On 5-year performance, LVHI leads with 15.66% vs 6.47% for LVHD. On fees, LVHD is cheaper at 0.27% per year. On volatility, LVHI has been the lower-risk option at 2.91%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, LVHI has performed better with a 15.66% return vs 6.47%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

LVHD is cheaper with a 0.27% expense ratio, compared with 0.40% for LVHI.

LVHI has the higher dividend yield at 4.80%, compared with 3.34% for LVHD.

LVHI tracks Franklin International Low Volatility High Dividend Hedged Index-NR, while LVHD tracks QS Low Volatility High Dividend Index. Their fees differ too: 0.40% for LVHI and 0.27% for LVHD.

LVHI currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.14 vs 1.32), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for LVHI and LVHD

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer