PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
LVHD vs. TRFK
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

LVHD vs. TRFK - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Franklin U.S. Low Volatility High Dividend Index ETF (LVHD) and Pacer Data and Digital Revolution ETF (TRFK). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LVHD achieves a 13.57% return, which is significantly lower than TRFK's 42.16% return.


LVHD

1D
-0.01%
1M
-0.57%
6M
7.71%
YTD
13.57%
1Y
14.82%
3Y*
10.47%
5Y*
7.44%
10Y*
8.26%
ALL TIME*
9.15%

TRFK

1D
2.15%
1M
-5.74%
6M
39.68%
YTD
42.16%
1Y
50.62%
3Y*
42.90%
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
37.18%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$2.34M$2.46M$2.92M
$17.22M$18.25M$19.56M

LVHD vs. TRFK - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
LVHD
Franklin U.S. Low Volatility High Dividend Index ETF
13.57%7.50%10.18%-0.95%-0.33%
TRFK
Pacer Data and Digital Revolution ETF
42.16%26.81%38.30%66.63%-10.61%

Correlation

The correlation between LVHD and TRFK is -0.28, meaning they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. This relationship can weaken or reverse as market conditions change.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

-0.28

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

-0.01

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 9, 2022

0.16

The correlation between LVHD and TRFK shifts across timeframes, from -0.28 (1 year) to 0.15 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

LVHD vs. TRFK - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
LVHD
TRFK

Utilities

24.8%

-

Consumer Defensive

21.8%

-

Real Estate

15.4%
0.0%

Financial Services

8.6%

-

Consumer Cyclical

7.5%

-

Energy

7.0%

-

Industrials

4.9%
12.0%

Healthcare

4.7%

-

Technology

3.1%
87.4%

Communication Services

2.2%
0.6%

Basic Materials

-

0.9%

Utilities

LVHD
24.8%
TRFK

-

Consumer Defensive

LVHD
21.8%
TRFK

-

Real Estate

LVHD
15.4%
TRFK
0.0%

Financial Services

LVHD
8.6%
TRFK

-

Consumer Cyclical

LVHD
7.5%
TRFK

-

Energy

LVHD
7.0%
TRFK

-

Industrials

LVHD
4.9%
TRFK
12.0%

Healthcare

LVHD
4.7%
TRFK

-

Technology

LVHD
3.1%
TRFK
87.4%

Communication Services

LVHD
2.2%
TRFK
0.6%

Basic Materials

LVHD

-

TRFK
0.9%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

LVHD vs. TRFK — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

LVHD
LVHD Risk / Return Rank: 5858
Overall Rank
LVHD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5858
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LVHD Sortino Ratio Rank: 6262
Sortino Ratio Rank
LVHD Omega Ratio Rank: 5454
Omega Ratio Rank
LVHD Calmar Ratio Rank: 6868
Calmar Ratio Rank
LVHD Martin Ratio Rank: 5050
Martin Ratio Rank

TRFK
TRFK Risk / Return Rank: 5252
Overall Rank
TRFK Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5656
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TRFK Sortino Ratio Rank: 5252
Sortino Ratio Rank
TRFK Omega Ratio Rank: 5252
Omega Ratio Rank
TRFK Calmar Ratio Rank: 5353
Calmar Ratio Rank
TRFK Martin Ratio Rank: 4545
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

LVHD vs. TRFK - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Franklin U.S. Low Volatility High Dividend Index ETF (LVHD) and Pacer Data and Digital Revolution ETF (TRFK). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


LVHDTRFKDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.03

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.24

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.25

1.24

+0.01

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.41

1.94

+0.47

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

5.96

5.23

+0.73

LVHD vs. TRFK - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current LVHD Sharpe Ratio is 1.42, which is comparable to the TRFK Sharpe Ratio of 1.38. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LVHD and TRFK, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

LVHD vs. TRFK - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LVHD drawdown since its inception was -37.32%, which is greater than TRFK's maximum drawdown of -29.06%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LVHD and TRFK.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


LVHDTRFKDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-37.32%

-29.06%

-8.26%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.17%

-26.17%

+20.00%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-11.87%

-29.06%

+17.19%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-16.75%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-37.32%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.13%

-18.08%

+15.95%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.00%

-6.25%

+2.25%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.49%

9.70%

-7.21%

Volatility

LVHD vs. TRFK - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Franklin U.S. Low Volatility High Dividend Index ETF (LVHD) is 4.27%, while Pacer Data and Digital Revolution ETF (TRFK) has a volatility of 16.62%. This indicates that LVHD experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than TRFK based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


LVHDTRFKDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.27%

16.62%

-12.35%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.31%

32.05%

-23.74%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

10.53%

36.82%

-26.29%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

13.05%

30.90%

-17.85%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.58%

30.90%

-15.32%

LVHD vs. TRFK - Expense Ratio Comparison

LVHD has a 0.27% expense ratio, which is lower than TRFK's 0.60% expense ratio.


Dividends

LVHD vs. TRFK - Dividend Comparison

LVHD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.20%, more than TRFK's 0.01% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019201820172016
LVHD
Franklin U.S. Low Volatility High Dividend Index ETF
3.20%3.35%4.23%3.55%3.30%2.56%3.27%3.30%3.82%3.33%2.48%
TRFK
Pacer Data and Digital Revolution ETF
0.01%0.01%0.40%0.20%0.56%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


LVHD and TRFK have a correlation of -0.28, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

TRFK has higher volatility (16.62%) compared to LVHD (4.27%). In terms of maximum drawdown, LVHD dropped -37.32% vs TRFK's -29.06%.

On 3-year performance, TRFK leads with 42.90% vs 10.47% for LVHD. On fees, LVHD is cheaper at 0.27% per year. On volatility, LVHD has been the lower-risk option at 4.27%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 3-year period, TRFK has performed better with a 42.90% return vs 10.47%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

LVHD is cheaper with a 0.27% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for TRFK.

LVHD has the higher dividend yield at 3.20%, compared with 0.01% for TRFK.

LVHD is categorized as Dividend, while TRFK is Technology Equities. LVHD tracks Franklin U.S. Low Volatility High Dividend Index, while TRFK tracks Pacer Data Transmission and Communication Revolution Index - Benchmark TR Net. They also come from different issuers: Franklin Templeton and Pacer. Their fees differ too: 0.27% for LVHD and 0.60% for TRFK.

LVHD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.42 vs 1.38), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for LVHD and TRFK

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer