PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
LVHD vs. SPLV
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

LVHD vs. SPLV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Franklin U.S. Low Volatility High Dividend Index ETF (LVHD) and Invesco S&P 500 Low Volatility ETF (SPLV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LVHD achieves a 10.55% return, which is significantly higher than SPLV's 5.06% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with LVHD having a 8.35% annualized return and SPLV not far ahead at 8.38%.


LVHD

1D
1.56%
1M
1.00%
YTD
10.55%
6M
10.56%
1Y
13.38%
3Y*
10.78%
5Y*
7.44%
10Y*
8.35%

SPLV

1D
1.32%
1M
0.35%
YTD
5.06%
6M
4.84%
1Y
4.45%
3Y*
8.50%
5Y*
6.37%
10Y*
8.38%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

LVHD vs. SPLV - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
LVHD
Franklin U.S. Low Volatility High Dividend Index ETF
10.55%7.50%10.18%-0.95%-1.82%26.90%-1.28%22.91%-5.58%14.25%
SPLV
Invesco S&P 500 Low Volatility ETF
5.06%4.10%13.93%0.53%-4.88%24.13%-1.39%27.87%-0.19%17.32%

Correlation

The correlation between LVHD and SPLV is 0.91, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.91

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.89

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.91

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.87

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 29, 2015

0.87

The correlation between LVHD and SPLV has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.87 to 0.91 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

LVHD vs. SPLV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

LVHD
LVHD Risk / Return Rank: 4040
Overall Rank
LVHD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4040
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LVHD Sortino Ratio Rank: 4040
Sortino Ratio Rank
LVHD Omega Ratio Rank: 3737
Omega Ratio Rank
LVHD Calmar Ratio Rank: 4545
Calmar Ratio Rank
LVHD Martin Ratio Rank: 3737
Martin Ratio Rank

SPLV
SPLV Risk / Return Rank: 1515
Overall Rank
SPLV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1515
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SPLV Sortino Ratio Rank: 1414
Sortino Ratio Rank
SPLV Omega Ratio Rank: 1313
Omega Ratio Rank
SPLV Calmar Ratio Rank: 1616
Calmar Ratio Rank
SPLV Martin Ratio Rank: 1515
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

LVHD vs. SPLV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Franklin U.S. Low Volatility High Dividend Index ETF (LVHD) and Invesco S&P 500 Low Volatility ETF (SPLV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


LVHDSPLVDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.91

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.31

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.23

1.08

+0.16

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.18

0.60

+1.58

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

5.41

1.39

+4.02

LVHD vs. SPLV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current LVHD Sharpe Ratio is 1.35, which is higher than the SPLV Sharpe Ratio of 0.44. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LVHD and SPLV, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

LVHD vs. SPLV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LVHD drawdown since its inception was -37.32%, roughly equal to the maximum SPLV drawdown of -36.26%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LVHD and SPLV.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


LVHDSPLVDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-37.32%

-36.26%

-1.06%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.17%

-7.41%

+1.24%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-14.29%

-9.64%

-4.65%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-16.75%

-17.26%

+0.51%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-37.32%

-36.26%

-1.06%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.43%

-3.47%

+2.04%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.04%

-3.55%

-0.49%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.48%

3.20%

-0.72%

Volatility

LVHD vs. SPLV - Volatility Comparison

Franklin U.S. Low Volatility High Dividend Index ETF (LVHD) and Invesco S&P 500 Low Volatility ETF (SPLV) have volatilities of 4.05% and 4.26%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


LVHDSPLVDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.05%

4.26%

-0.21%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.26%

7.38%

-0.12%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

9.98%

10.28%

-0.30%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

12.91%

12.50%

+0.41%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.53%

15.39%

+0.14%

LVHD vs. SPLV - Expense Ratio Comparison

LVHD has a 0.27% expense ratio, which is higher than SPLV's 0.25% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

LVHD vs. SPLV - Dividend Comparison

LVHD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.29%, more than SPLV's 2.16% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
LVHD
Franklin U.S. Low Volatility High Dividend Index ETF
3.29%3.35%4.23%3.55%3.30%2.56%3.27%3.30%3.82%3.33%2.48%0.00%
SPLV
Invesco S&P 500 Low Volatility ETF
2.16%2.04%1.88%2.45%2.11%1.51%2.12%2.08%2.18%2.03%2.03%2.28%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.91, LVHD and SPLV move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

SPLV has higher volatility (4.26%) compared to LVHD (4.05%). In terms of maximum drawdown, LVHD dropped -37.32% vs SPLV's -36.26%.

On 10-year performance, SPLV leads with 8.38% vs 8.35% for LVHD. On fees, SPLV is cheaper at 0.25% per year. On volatility, LVHD has been the lower-risk option at 4.05%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, SPLV has performed better with a 8.38% return vs 8.35%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

SPLV is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.27% for LVHD.

LVHD has the higher dividend yield at 3.29%, compared with 2.16% for SPLV.

LVHD is categorized as Dividend, while SPLV is S&P 500. LVHD tracks Franklin U.S. Low Volatility High Dividend Index, while SPLV tracks S&P 500 Low Volatility Index. They also come from different issuers: Franklin Templeton and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.27% for LVHD and 0.25% for SPLV.

LVHD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.35 vs 0.44), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for LVHD and SPLV

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer