PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SPLV vs. SPHB
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SPLV vs. SPHB - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco S&P 500 Low Volatility ETF (SPLV) and Invesco S&P 500® High Beta ETF (SPHB). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SPLV achieves a 1.23% return, which is significantly lower than SPHB's 31.23% return. Over the past 10 years, SPLV has underperformed SPHB with an annualized return of 8.01%, while SPHB has yielded a comparatively higher 19.00% annualized return.


SPLV

1D
0.46%
1M
-3.22%
YTD
1.23%
6M
0.93%
1Y
-0.33%
3Y*
7.51%
5Y*
5.41%
10Y*
8.01%

SPHB

1D
1.79%
1M
13.21%
YTD
31.23%
6M
34.78%
1Y
73.84%
3Y*
29.92%
5Y*
15.44%
10Y*
19.00%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SPLV vs. SPHB - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
SPLV
Invesco S&P 500 Low Volatility ETF
1.23%4.10%13.93%0.53%-4.88%24.13%-1.39%27.87%-0.19%17.32%
SPHB
Invesco S&P 500® High Beta ETF
31.23%32.87%8.48%33.28%-20.59%40.58%25.56%33.96%-15.55%17.87%

Correlation

The correlation between SPLV and SPHB is 0.05, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.05

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.25

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.36

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.42

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 6, 2011

0.51

Over the past year, the correlation between SPLV and SPHB has dropped to 0.05 - well below their long-term average of 0.51, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

SPLV vs. SPHB - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
SPLV
SPHB

Utilities

26.8%
3.2%

Financial Services

16.6%
12.5%

Real Estate

14.8%

-

Consumer Defensive

10.8%
0.6%

Industrials

10.1%
11.7%

Healthcare

6.8%
2.9%

Consumer Cyclical

5.7%
12.9%

Technology

4.6%
45.8%

Basic Materials

2.0%
4.6%

Energy

0.9%
2.2%

Communication Services

0.9%
3.7%

Utilities

SPLV
26.8%
SPHB
3.2%

Financial Services

SPLV
16.6%
SPHB
12.5%

Real Estate

SPLV
14.8%
SPHB

-

Consumer Defensive

SPLV
10.8%
SPHB
0.6%

Industrials

SPLV
10.1%
SPHB
11.7%

Healthcare

SPLV
6.8%
SPHB
2.9%

Consumer Cyclical

SPLV
5.7%
SPHB
12.9%

Technology

SPLV
4.6%
SPHB
45.8%

Basic Materials

SPLV
2.0%
SPHB
4.6%

Energy

SPLV
0.9%
SPHB
2.2%

Communication Services

SPLV
0.9%
SPHB
3.7%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SPLV vs. SPHB — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SPLV
SPLV Risk / Return Rank: 88
Overall Rank
SPLV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 88
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SPLV Sortino Ratio Rank: 88
Sortino Ratio Rank
SPLV Omega Ratio Rank: 88
Omega Ratio Rank
SPLV Calmar Ratio Rank: 88
Calmar Ratio Rank
SPLV Martin Ratio Rank: 88
Martin Ratio Rank

SPHB
SPHB Risk / Return Rank: 9191
Overall Rank
SPHB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9292
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SPHB Sortino Ratio Rank: 8888
Sortino Ratio Rank
SPHB Omega Ratio Rank: 8585
Omega Ratio Rank
SPHB Calmar Ratio Rank: 9494
Calmar Ratio Rank
SPHB Martin Ratio Rank: 9494
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SPLV vs. SPHB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco S&P 500 Low Volatility ETF (SPLV) and Invesco S&P 500® High Beta ETF (SPHB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


SPLVSPHBDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

-0.03

3.35

-3.39

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

0.02

4.03

-4.01

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.00

1.53

-0.53

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

-0.05

7.06

-7.10

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

-0.11

28.13

-28.24

SPLV vs. SPHB - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SPLV Sharpe Ratio is -0.03, which is lower than the SPHB Sharpe Ratio of 3.35. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SPLV and SPHB, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


SPLVSPHBDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.03

3.35

-3.39

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.44

0.57

-0.13

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.52

0.67

-0.15

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.68

0.53

+0.15

Drawdowns

SPLV vs. SPHB - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SPLV drawdown since its inception was -36.26%, smaller than the maximum SPHB drawdown of -46.84%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SPLV and SPHB.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SPLVSPHBDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-36.26%

-46.84%

+10.58%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.41%

-10.70%

+3.29%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-9.64%

-29.21%

+19.57%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-17.26%

-31.49%

+14.23%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-36.26%

-46.84%

+10.58%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-6.98%

0.00%

-6.98%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.55%

-8.50%

+4.95%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.03%

2.69%

+0.34%

Volatility

SPLV vs. SPHB - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Invesco S&P 500 Low Volatility ETF (SPLV) is 3.00%, while Invesco S&P 500® High Beta ETF (SPHB) has a volatility of 7.05%. This indicates that SPLV experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SPHB based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SPLVSPHBDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.00%

7.05%

-4.05%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

6.89%

16.98%

-10.09%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

9.78%

22.15%

-12.37%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

12.45%

27.38%

-14.93%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.36%

28.45%

-13.09%

SPLV vs. SPHB - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both SPLV and SPHB have an expense ratio of 0.25%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

SPLV vs. SPHB - Dividend Comparison

SPLV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.23%, more than SPHB's 0.51% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
SPHB
Invesco S&P 500® High Beta ETF
0.51%0.60%0.80%0.73%0.72%0.91%1.90%1.26%1.96%1.34%0.93%1.69%
SPLV
Invesco S&P 500 Low Volatility ETF
2.23%2.04%1.88%2.45%2.11%1.51%2.12%2.08%2.18%2.03%2.03%2.28%

Frequently Asked Questions


SPLV and SPHB have a correlation of 0.05, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

SPHB has higher volatility (7.05%) compared to SPLV (3.00%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SPLV dropped -36.26% vs SPHB's -46.84%.

On 10-year performance, SPHB leads with 19.00% vs 8.01% for SPLV. Both ETFs have the same 0.25% expense ratio. On volatility, SPLV has been the lower-risk option at 3.00%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, SPHB has performed better with a 19.00% return vs 8.01%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

SPLV and SPHB have the same expense ratio: 0.25% per year.

SPLV has the higher dividend yield at 2.23%, compared with 0.51% for SPHB.

SPLV tracks S&P 500 Low Volatility Index, while SPHB tracks S&P 500 High Beta Index.

SPHB currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.35 vs -0.03), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SPLV and SPHB

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer