SPLV vs. SPHB
SPLV (Invesco S&P 500 Low Volatility ETF) and SPHB (Invesco S&P 500® High Beta ETF) are both S&P 500 funds from Invesco - SPLV tracks the S&P 500 Low Volatility Index while SPHB tracks the S&P 500 High Beta Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, SPLV returned 8.01%/yr vs 19.00%/yr for SPHB. A 0.51 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. Both charge a 0.25% expense ratio.
Performance
SPLV vs. SPHB - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SPLV achieves a 1.23% return, which is significantly lower than SPHB's 31.23% return. Over the past 10 years, SPLV has underperformed SPHB with an annualized return of 8.01%, while SPHB has yielded a comparatively higher 19.00% annualized return.
SPLV
- 1D
- 0.46%
- 1M
- -3.22%
- YTD
- 1.23%
- 6M
- 0.93%
- 1Y
- -0.33%
- 3Y*
- 7.51%
- 5Y*
- 5.41%
- 10Y*
- 8.01%
SPHB
- 1D
- 1.79%
- 1M
- 13.21%
- YTD
- 31.23%
- 6M
- 34.78%
- 1Y
- 73.84%
- 3Y*
- 29.92%
- 5Y*
- 15.44%
- 10Y*
- 19.00%
SPLV vs. SPHB - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SPLV Invesco S&P 500 Low Volatility ETF | 1.23% | 4.10% | 13.93% | 0.53% | -4.88% | 24.13% | -1.39% | 27.87% | -0.19% | 17.32% |
SPHB Invesco S&P 500® High Beta ETF | 31.23% | 32.87% | 8.48% | 33.28% | -20.59% | 40.58% | 25.56% | 33.96% | -15.55% | 17.87% |
Correlation
The correlation between SPLV and SPHB is 0.05, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.05 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.25 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.36 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.42 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 6, 2011 | 0.51 |
Over the past year, the correlation between SPLV and SPHB has dropped to 0.05 - well below their long-term average of 0.51, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
SPLV vs. SPHB - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
SPLV
SPHB
Utilities
Financial Services
Real Estate
-
Consumer Defensive
Industrials
Healthcare
Consumer Cyclical
Technology
Basic Materials
Energy
Communication Services
Utilities
SPLV
SPHB
Financial Services
SPLV
SPHB
Real Estate
SPLV
SPHB
-
Consumer Defensive
SPLV
SPHB
Industrials
SPLV
SPHB
Healthcare
SPLV
SPHB
Consumer Cyclical
SPLV
SPHB
Technology
SPLV
SPHB
Basic Materials
SPLV
SPHB
Energy
SPLV
SPHB
Communication Services
SPLV
SPHB
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SPLV vs. SPHB — Risk / Return Rank
SPLV
SPHB
SPLV vs. SPHB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco S&P 500 Low Volatility ETF (SPLV) and Invesco S&P 500® High Beta ETF (SPHB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| SPLV | SPHB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.03 | 3.35 | -3.39 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 0.02 | 4.03 | -4.01 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.00 | 1.53 | -0.53 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.05 | 7.06 | -7.10 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.11 | 28.13 | -28.24 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| SPLV | SPHB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.03 | 3.35 | -3.39 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.44 | 0.57 | -0.13 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.52 | 0.67 | -0.15 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.68 | 0.53 | +0.15 |
Drawdowns
SPLV vs. SPHB - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SPLV drawdown since its inception was -36.26%, smaller than the maximum SPHB drawdown of -46.84%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SPLV and SPHB.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SPLV | SPHB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -36.26% | -46.84% | +10.58% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -7.41% | -10.70% | +3.29% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -9.64% | -29.21% | +19.57% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -17.26% | -31.49% | +14.23% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -36.26% | -46.84% | +10.58% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -6.98% | 0.00% | -6.98% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.55% | -8.50% | +4.95% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.03% | 2.69% | +0.34% |
Volatility
SPLV vs. SPHB - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Invesco S&P 500 Low Volatility ETF (SPLV) is 3.00%, while Invesco S&P 500® High Beta ETF (SPHB) has a volatility of 7.05%. This indicates that SPLV experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SPHB based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SPLV | SPHB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.00% | 7.05% | -4.05% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 6.89% | 16.98% | -10.09% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 9.78% | 22.15% | -12.37% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 12.45% | 27.38% | -14.93% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 15.36% | 28.45% | -13.09% |
SPLV vs. SPHB - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both SPLV and SPHB have an expense ratio of 0.25%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
SPLV vs. SPHB - Dividend Comparison
SPLV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.23%, more than SPHB's 0.51% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SPHB Invesco S&P 500® High Beta ETF | 0.51% | 0.60% | 0.80% | 0.73% | 0.72% | 0.91% | 1.90% | 1.26% | 1.96% | 1.34% | 0.93% | 1.69% |
SPLV Invesco S&P 500 Low Volatility ETF | 2.23% | 2.04% | 1.88% | 2.45% | 2.11% | 1.51% | 2.12% | 2.08% | 2.18% | 2.03% | 2.03% | 2.28% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SPLV and SPHB have a correlation of 0.05, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SPHB has higher volatility (7.05%) compared to SPLV (3.00%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SPLV dropped -36.26% vs SPHB's -46.84%.
On 10-year performance, SPHB leads with 19.00% vs 8.01% for SPLV. Both ETFs have the same 0.25% expense ratio. On volatility, SPLV has been the lower-risk option at 3.00%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, SPHB has performed better with a 19.00% return vs 8.01%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SPLV and SPHB have the same expense ratio: 0.25% per year.
SPLV has the higher dividend yield at 2.23%, compared with 0.51% for SPHB.
SPLV tracks S&P 500 Low Volatility Index, while SPHB tracks S&P 500 High Beta Index.
SPHB currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.35 vs -0.03), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SPLV and SPHB
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer