PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
LVHD vs. SPDG
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

LVHD vs. SPDG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Franklin U.S. Low Volatility High Dividend Index ETF (LVHD) and SPDR Portfolio S&P Sector Neutral Dividend ETF (SPDG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LVHD achieves a 13.57% return, which is significantly lower than SPDG's 14.79% return.


LVHD

1D
-0.01%
1M
-0.57%
6M
7.71%
YTD
13.57%
1Y
14.82%
3Y*
10.47%
5Y*
7.44%
10Y*
8.26%
ALL TIME*
9.15%

SPDG

1D
0.49%
1M
-0.29%
6M
6.75%
YTD
14.79%
1Y
25.12%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
19.30%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$2.34M$2.46M$2.92M
$47.62K$41.21K$36.93K

LVHD vs. SPDG - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
LVHD
Franklin U.S. Low Volatility High Dividend Index ETF
13.57%7.50%10.18%4.48%
SPDG
SPDR Portfolio S&P Sector Neutral Dividend ETF
14.79%11.66%20.22%8.09%

Correlation

The correlation between LVHD and SPDG is 0.55, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.55

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 12, 2023

0.64

The correlation between LVHD and SPDG has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.55 to 0.64 - a consistent structural relationship.

LVHD vs. SPDG - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
LVHD
SPDG

Utilities

24.8%
2.6%

Consumer Defensive

21.8%
5.4%

Real Estate

15.4%
2.4%

Financial Services

8.6%
13.3%

Consumer Cyclical

7.5%
9.6%

Energy

7.0%
4.1%

Industrials

4.9%
9.0%

Healthcare

4.7%
10.2%

Technology

3.1%
32.4%

Communication Services

2.2%
8.6%

Basic Materials

-

2.2%

Utilities

LVHD
24.8%
SPDG
2.6%

Consumer Defensive

LVHD
21.8%
SPDG
5.4%

Real Estate

LVHD
15.4%
SPDG
2.4%

Financial Services

LVHD
8.6%
SPDG
13.3%

Consumer Cyclical

LVHD
7.5%
SPDG
9.6%

Energy

LVHD
7.0%
SPDG
4.1%

Industrials

LVHD
4.9%
SPDG
9.0%

Healthcare

LVHD
4.7%
SPDG
10.2%

Technology

LVHD
3.1%
SPDG
32.4%

Communication Services

LVHD
2.2%
SPDG
8.6%

Basic Materials

LVHD

-

SPDG
2.2%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

LVHD vs. SPDG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

LVHD
LVHD Risk / Return Rank: 5858
Overall Rank
LVHD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5858
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LVHD Sortino Ratio Rank: 6262
Sortino Ratio Rank
LVHD Omega Ratio Rank: 5454
Omega Ratio Rank
LVHD Calmar Ratio Rank: 6868
Calmar Ratio Rank
LVHD Martin Ratio Rank: 5050
Martin Ratio Rank

SPDG
SPDG Risk / Return Rank: 8282
Overall Rank
SPDG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8484
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SPDG Sortino Ratio Rank: 8585
Sortino Ratio Rank
SPDG Omega Ratio Rank: 8282
Omega Ratio Rank
SPDG Calmar Ratio Rank: 8181
Calmar Ratio Rank
SPDG Martin Ratio Rank: 7676
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

LVHD vs. SPDG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Franklin U.S. Low Volatility High Dividend Index ETF (LVHD) and SPDR Portfolio S&P Sector Neutral Dividend ETF (SPDG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


LVHDSPDGDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.61

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.77

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.25

1.36

-0.11

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.41

3.03

-0.61

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

5.96

9.88

-3.92

LVHD vs. SPDG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current LVHD Sharpe Ratio is 1.42, which is lower than the SPDG Sharpe Ratio of 2.03. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LVHD and SPDG, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

LVHD vs. SPDG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LVHD drawdown since its inception was -37.32%, which is greater than SPDG's maximum drawdown of -15.67%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LVHD and SPDG.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


LVHDSPDGDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-37.32%

-15.67%

-21.65%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.17%

-8.34%

+2.17%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-11.87%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-16.75%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-37.32%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.13%

-2.29%

+0.16%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.00%

-2.19%

-1.81%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.49%

2.55%

-0.06%

Volatility

LVHD vs. SPDG - Volatility Comparison

Franklin U.S. Low Volatility High Dividend Index ETF (LVHD) has a higher volatility of 4.27% compared to SPDR Portfolio S&P Sector Neutral Dividend ETF (SPDG) at 3.53%. This indicates that LVHD's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SPDG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


LVHDSPDGDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.27%

3.53%

+0.74%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.31%

9.54%

-1.23%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

10.53%

12.45%

-1.92%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

13.05%

14.10%

-1.05%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.58%

14.10%

+1.48%

LVHD vs. SPDG - Expense Ratio Comparison

LVHD has a 0.27% expense ratio, which is higher than SPDG's 0.05% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

LVHD vs. SPDG - Dividend Comparison

LVHD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.20%, more than SPDG's 2.71% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019201820172016
LVHD
Franklin U.S. Low Volatility High Dividend Index ETF
3.20%3.35%4.23%3.55%3.30%2.56%3.27%3.30%3.82%3.33%2.48%
SPDG
SPDR Portfolio S&P Sector Neutral Dividend ETF
2.71%2.87%2.61%0.90%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


LVHD and SPDG have a correlation of 0.55, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

LVHD has higher volatility (4.27%) compared to SPDG (3.53%). In terms of maximum drawdown, LVHD dropped -37.32% vs SPDG's -15.67%.

On 1-year performance, SPDG leads with 25.12% vs 14.82% for LVHD. On fees, SPDG is cheaper at 0.05% per year. On volatility, SPDG has been the lower-risk option at 3.53%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, SPDG has performed better with a 25.12% return vs 14.82%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

SPDG is cheaper with a 0.05% expense ratio, compared with 0.27% for LVHD.

LVHD has the higher dividend yield at 3.20%, compared with 2.71% for SPDG.

LVHD tracks Franklin U.S. Low Volatility High Dividend Index, while SPDG tracks S&P Sector-Neutral High Yield Dividend Aristocrats Index. They also come from different issuers: Franklin Templeton and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.27% for LVHD and 0.05% for SPDG.

SPDG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.03 vs 1.42), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for LVHD and SPDG

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer