PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
LVHD vs. DGRE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

LVHD vs. DGRE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Franklin U.S. Low Volatility High Dividend Index ETF (LVHD) and WisdomTree Emerging Markets Quality Dividend Growth Fund (DGRE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LVHD achieves a 10.55% return, which is significantly lower than DGRE's 27.61% return. Over the past 10 years, LVHD has underperformed DGRE with an annualized return of 8.35%, while DGRE has yielded a comparatively higher 9.58% annualized return.


LVHD

1D
1.56%
1M
1.00%
YTD
10.55%
6M
10.56%
1Y
13.38%
3Y*
10.78%
5Y*
7.44%
10Y*
8.35%

DGRE

1D
-5.02%
1M
2.22%
YTD
27.61%
6M
28.61%
1Y
51.74%
3Y*
23.16%
5Y*
8.42%
10Y*
9.58%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

LVHD vs. DGRE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
LVHD
Franklin U.S. Low Volatility High Dividend Index ETF
10.55%7.50%10.18%-0.95%-1.82%26.90%-1.28%22.91%-5.58%14.25%
DGRE
WisdomTree Emerging Markets Quality Dividend Growth Fund
27.61%27.47%3.63%18.46%-21.86%2.55%10.85%21.12%-16.36%33.61%

Correlation

The correlation between LVHD and DGRE is 0.07, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.07

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.22

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.27

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.35

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 29, 2015

0.37

Over the past year, the correlation between LVHD and DGRE has dropped to 0.07 - well below their long-term average of 0.37, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

LVHD vs. DGRE - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
LVHD
DGRE

Utilities

24.8%
2.2%

Consumer Defensive

21.8%
4.5%

Real Estate

15.4%
0.8%

Financial Services

8.2%
17.8%

Consumer Cyclical

7.4%
5.5%

Energy

7.4%
1.9%

Industrials

4.9%
11.8%

Healthcare

4.4%
4.8%

Technology

3.1%
41.5%

Communication Services

2.6%
2.6%

Basic Materials

-

6.6%

Utilities

LVHD
24.8%
DGRE
2.2%

Consumer Defensive

LVHD
21.8%
DGRE
4.5%

Real Estate

LVHD
15.4%
DGRE
0.8%

Financial Services

LVHD
8.2%
DGRE
17.8%

Consumer Cyclical

LVHD
7.4%
DGRE
5.5%

Energy

LVHD
7.4%
DGRE
1.9%

Industrials

LVHD
4.9%
DGRE
11.8%

Healthcare

LVHD
4.4%
DGRE
4.8%

Technology

LVHD
3.1%
DGRE
41.5%

Communication Services

LVHD
2.6%
DGRE
2.6%

Basic Materials

LVHD

-

DGRE
6.6%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

LVHD vs. DGRE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

LVHD
LVHD Risk / Return Rank: 4040
Overall Rank
LVHD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4040
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LVHD Sortino Ratio Rank: 4040
Sortino Ratio Rank
LVHD Omega Ratio Rank: 3737
Omega Ratio Rank
LVHD Calmar Ratio Rank: 4545
Calmar Ratio Rank
LVHD Martin Ratio Rank: 3737
Martin Ratio Rank

DGRE
DGRE Risk / Return Rank: 7676
Overall Rank
DGRE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7777
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DGRE Sortino Ratio Rank: 6969
Sortino Ratio Rank
DGRE Omega Ratio Rank: 7777
Omega Ratio Rank
DGRE Calmar Ratio Rank: 7878
Calmar Ratio Rank
DGRE Martin Ratio Rank: 8080
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

LVHD vs. DGRE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Franklin U.S. Low Volatility High Dividend Index ETF (LVHD) and WisdomTree Emerging Markets Quality Dividend Growth Fund (DGRE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


LVHDDGREDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.95

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.95

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.23

1.42

-0.19

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.18

3.80

-1.62

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

5.41

14.91

-9.50

LVHD vs. DGRE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current LVHD Sharpe Ratio is 1.35, which is lower than the DGRE Sharpe Ratio of 2.30. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LVHD and DGRE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

LVHD vs. DGRE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LVHD drawdown since its inception was -37.32%, roughly equal to the maximum DGRE drawdown of -36.95%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LVHD and DGRE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


LVHDDGREDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-37.32%

-36.95%

-0.37%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.17%

-13.68%

+7.51%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-14.29%

-20.65%

+6.36%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-16.75%

-33.99%

+17.24%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-37.32%

-36.95%

-0.37%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.43%

-5.67%

+4.24%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.04%

-11.96%

+7.92%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.48%

3.48%

-1.00%

Volatility

LVHD vs. DGRE - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Franklin U.S. Low Volatility High Dividend Index ETF (LVHD) is 4.05%, while WisdomTree Emerging Markets Quality Dividend Growth Fund (DGRE) has a volatility of 11.80%. This indicates that LVHD experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than DGRE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


LVHDDGREDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.05%

11.80%

-7.75%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.26%

20.85%

-13.59%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

9.98%

22.57%

-12.59%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

12.91%

18.71%

-5.80%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.53%

19.83%

-4.30%

LVHD vs. DGRE - Expense Ratio Comparison

LVHD has a 0.27% expense ratio, which is lower than DGRE's 0.32% expense ratio.


Dividends

LVHD vs. DGRE - Dividend Comparison

LVHD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.29%, more than DGRE's 1.22% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
DGRE
WisdomTree Emerging Markets Quality Dividend Growth Fund
1.22%1.65%1.90%2.22%4.38%2.56%2.11%2.32%2.71%3.12%3.18%3.01%
LVHD
Franklin U.S. Low Volatility High Dividend Index ETF
3.29%3.35%4.23%3.55%3.30%2.56%3.27%3.30%3.82%3.33%2.48%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


LVHD and DGRE have a correlation of 0.07, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

DGRE has higher volatility (11.80%) compared to LVHD (4.05%). In terms of maximum drawdown, LVHD dropped -37.32% vs DGRE's -36.95%.

On 10-year performance, DGRE leads with 9.58% vs 8.35% for LVHD. On fees, LVHD is cheaper at 0.27% per year. On volatility, LVHD has been the lower-risk option at 4.05%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, DGRE has performed better with a 9.58% return vs 8.35%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

LVHD is cheaper with a 0.27% expense ratio, compared with 0.32% for DGRE.

LVHD has the higher dividend yield at 3.29%, compared with 1.22% for DGRE.

LVHD is categorized as Dividend, while DGRE is Emerging Markets Equities. They also come from different issuers: Franklin Templeton and WisdomTree. Their fees differ too: 0.27% for LVHD and 0.32% for DGRE.

DGRE currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.30 vs 1.35), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for LVHD and DGRE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer