PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
DGRE vs. DGRW
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

DGRE vs. DGRW - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in WisdomTree Emerging Markets Quality Dividend Growth Fund (DGRE) and WisdomTree U.S. Quality Dividend Growth Fund (DGRW). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DGRE achieves a 31.30% return, which is significantly higher than DGRW's 9.10% return. Over the past 10 years, DGRE has underperformed DGRW with an annualized return of 9.71%, while DGRW has yielded a comparatively higher 14.15% annualized return.


DGRE

1D
-0.94%
1M
8.34%
YTD
31.30%
6M
36.66%
1Y
58.03%
3Y*
24.56%
5Y*
8.61%
10Y*
9.71%

DGRW

1D
-0.83%
1M
4.06%
YTD
9.10%
6M
8.62%
1Y
20.79%
3Y*
16.64%
5Y*
12.17%
10Y*
14.15%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DGRE vs. DGRW - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
DGRE
WisdomTree Emerging Markets Quality Dividend Growth Fund
31.30%27.47%3.63%18.46%-21.86%2.55%10.85%21.12%-16.36%33.61%
DGRW
WisdomTree U.S. Quality Dividend Growth Fund
9.10%12.17%16.98%18.66%-6.33%24.46%13.87%29.54%-5.38%26.90%

Correlation

The correlation between DGRE and DGRW is 0.67, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.67

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.59

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.56

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.59

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 2, 2013

0.59

The correlation between DGRE and DGRW shifts across timeframes, from 0.56 (5 years) to 0.67 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

DGRE vs. DGRW - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
DGRE
DGRW

Technology

38.6%
32.1%

Financial Services

11.8%
11.3%

Industrials

7.8%
9.9%

Basic Materials

4.4%
3.3%

Consumer Cyclical

2.7%
7.1%

Healthcare

2.6%
12.8%

Consumer Defensive

2.3%
6.7%

Energy

1.1%
5.0%

Utilities

0.9%
0.2%

Communication Services

0.8%
10.1%

Real Estate

0.3%

-

Technology

DGRE
38.6%
DGRW
32.1%

Financial Services

DGRE
11.8%
DGRW
11.3%

Industrials

DGRE
7.8%
DGRW
9.9%

Basic Materials

DGRE
4.4%
DGRW
3.3%

Consumer Cyclical

DGRE
2.7%
DGRW
7.1%

Healthcare

DGRE
2.6%
DGRW
12.8%

Consumer Defensive

DGRE
2.3%
DGRW
6.7%

Energy

DGRE
1.1%
DGRW
5.0%

Utilities

DGRE
0.9%
DGRW
0.2%

Communication Services

DGRE
0.8%
DGRW
10.1%

Real Estate

DGRE
0.3%
DGRW

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

DGRE vs. DGRW — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DGRE
DGRE Risk / Return Rank: 8484
Overall Rank
DGRE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8787
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DGRE Sortino Ratio Rank: 8282
Sortino Ratio Rank
DGRE Omega Ratio Rank: 8585
Omega Ratio Rank
DGRE Calmar Ratio Rank: 8181
Calmar Ratio Rank
DGRE Martin Ratio Rank: 8484
Martin Ratio Rank

DGRW
DGRW Risk / Return Rank: 6060
Overall Rank
DGRW Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6161
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DGRW Sortino Ratio Rank: 6565
Sortino Ratio Rank
DGRW Omega Ratio Rank: 6363
Omega Ratio Rank
DGRW Calmar Ratio Rank: 5050
Calmar Ratio Rank
DGRW Martin Ratio Rank: 6161
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DGRE vs. DGRW - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for WisdomTree Emerging Markets Quality Dividend Growth Fund (DGRE) and WisdomTree U.S. Quality Dividend Growth Fund (DGRW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


DGREDGRWDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.79

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.64

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.52

1.39

+0.13

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.26

2.52

+1.75

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

17.40

11.03

+6.38

DGRE vs. DGRW - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DGRE Sharpe Ratio is 2.91, which is higher than the DGRW Sharpe Ratio of 2.12. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DGRE and DGRW, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


DGREDGRWDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.91

2.12

+0.79

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.48

0.88

-0.40

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.50

0.88

-0.38

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.32

0.86

-0.53

Drawdowns

DGRE vs. DGRW - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DGRE drawdown since its inception was -36.95%, which is greater than DGRW's maximum drawdown of -32.04%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DGRE and DGRW.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


DGREDGRWDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-36.95%

-32.04%

-4.91%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-13.68%

-8.30%

-5.38%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-20.65%

-16.21%

-4.44%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-34.82%

-17.27%

-17.55%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-36.95%

-32.04%

-4.91%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.94%

-0.83%

-0.11%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-12.00%

-3.01%

-8.99%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.34%

1.89%

+1.45%

Volatility

DGRE vs. DGRW - Volatility Comparison

WisdomTree Emerging Markets Quality Dividend Growth Fund (DGRE) has a higher volatility of 8.88% compared to WisdomTree U.S. Quality Dividend Growth Fund (DGRW) at 2.47%. This indicates that DGRE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than DGRW based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


DGREDGRWDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

8.88%

2.47%

+6.41%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

17.97%

7.64%

+10.33%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

20.08%

9.88%

+10.20%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

18.11%

13.97%

+4.14%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.64%

16.21%

+3.43%

DGRE vs. DGRW - Expense Ratio Comparison

DGRE has a 0.32% expense ratio, which is higher than DGRW's 0.28% expense ratio.


Dividends

DGRE vs. DGRW - Dividend Comparison

DGRE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.18%, less than DGRW's 1.27% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
DGRE
WisdomTree Emerging Markets Quality Dividend Growth Fund
1.18%1.65%1.90%2.22%4.38%2.56%2.11%2.32%2.71%3.12%3.18%3.01%
DGRW
WisdomTree U.S. Quality Dividend Growth Fund
1.27%1.43%1.55%1.74%2.15%1.78%1.93%2.20%2.42%1.71%2.13%2.18%

Frequently Asked Questions


DGRE and DGRW have a correlation of 0.67, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

DGRE has higher volatility (8.88%) compared to DGRW (2.47%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DGRE dropped -36.95% vs DGRW's -32.04%.

On 10-year performance, DGRW leads with 14.15% vs 9.71% for DGRE. On fees, DGRW is cheaper at 0.28% per year. On volatility, DGRW has been the lower-risk option at 2.47%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, DGRW has performed better with a 14.15% return vs 9.71%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

DGRW is cheaper with a 0.28% expense ratio, compared with 0.32% for DGRE.

DGRW has the higher dividend yield at 1.27%, compared with 1.18% for DGRE.

DGRE is categorized as Emerging Markets Equities, while DGRW is Dividend. Their fees differ too: 0.32% for DGRE and 0.28% for DGRW.

DGRE currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.91 vs 2.12), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for DGRE and DGRW

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer