PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
DGRE vs. DGRW
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

DGRE vs. DGRW - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in WisdomTree Emerging Markets Quality Dividend Growth Fund (DGRE) and WisdomTree U.S. Quality Dividend Growth Fund (DGRW). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DGRE achieves a 24.33% return, which is significantly higher than DGRW's 10.05% return. Over the past 10 years, DGRE has underperformed DGRW with an annualized return of 8.04%, while DGRW has yielded a comparatively higher 13.79% annualized return.


DGRE

1D
1.17%
1M
-2.01%
6M
14.83%
YTD
24.33%
1Y
43.98%
3Y*
20.91%
5Y*
8.18%
10Y*
8.04%
ALL TIME*
5.91%

DGRW

1D
1.37%
1M
2.07%
6M
6.86%
YTD
10.05%
1Y
17.60%
3Y*
15.28%
5Y*
11.72%
10Y*
13.79%
ALL TIME*
13.05%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$229.67K$448.89K$491.47K
$51.74M$49.20M$56.02M

DGRE vs. DGRW - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
DGRE
WisdomTree Emerging Markets Quality Dividend Growth Fund
24.33%27.47%3.63%18.46%-21.86%2.55%10.85%21.12%-16.36%33.61%
DGRW
WisdomTree U.S. Quality Dividend Growth Fund
10.05%12.17%16.98%18.66%-6.33%24.46%13.87%29.54%-5.38%26.90%

Correlation

The correlation between DGRE and DGRW is 0.66, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.66

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.60

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.56

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.58

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 1, 2013

0.59

The correlation between DGRE and DGRW has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.56 to 0.66 - a consistent structural relationship.

DGRE vs. DGRW - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
DGRE
DGRW

Technology

38.6%
33.8%

Financial Services

11.8%
8.4%

Industrials

8.0%
11.8%

Basic Materials

4.4%
2.8%

Healthcare

2.6%
12.8%

Consumer Cyclical

2.6%
8.0%

Consumer Defensive

2.3%
6.7%

Energy

1.1%
4.5%

Utilities

0.9%
0.2%

Communication Services

0.8%
11.1%

Real Estate

0.3%

-

Technology

DGRE
38.6%
DGRW
33.8%

Financial Services

DGRE
11.8%
DGRW
8.4%

Industrials

DGRE
8.0%
DGRW
11.8%

Basic Materials

DGRE
4.4%
DGRW
2.8%

Healthcare

DGRE
2.6%
DGRW
12.8%

Consumer Cyclical

DGRE
2.6%
DGRW
8.0%

Consumer Defensive

DGRE
2.3%
DGRW
6.7%

Energy

DGRE
1.1%
DGRW
4.5%

Utilities

DGRE
0.9%
DGRW
0.2%

Communication Services

DGRE
0.8%
DGRW
11.1%

Real Estate

DGRE
0.3%
DGRW

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

DGRE vs. DGRW — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

DGRE
DGRE Risk / Return Rank: 7777
Overall Rank
DGRE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7777
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DGRE Sortino Ratio Rank: 7272
Sortino Ratio Rank
DGRE Omega Ratio Rank: 7777
Omega Ratio Rank
DGRE Calmar Ratio Rank: 8383
Calmar Ratio Rank
DGRE Martin Ratio Rank: 7676
Martin Ratio Rank

DGRW
DGRW Risk / Return Rank: 7070
Overall Rank
DGRW Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7373
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DGRW Sortino Ratio Rank: 7474
Sortino Ratio Rank
DGRW Omega Ratio Rank: 7474
Omega Ratio Rank
DGRW Calmar Ratio Rank: 5959
Calmar Ratio Rank
DGRW Martin Ratio Rank: 6969
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

DGRE vs. DGRW - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for WisdomTree Emerging Markets Quality Dividend Growth Fund (DGRE) and WisdomTree U.S. Quality Dividend Growth Fund (DGRW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


DGREDGRWDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.13

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.01

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.33

1.31

+0.02

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.23

2.13

+1.10

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

10.12

8.60

+1.52

DGRE vs. DGRW - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DGRE Sharpe Ratio is 1.82, which is comparable to the DGRW Sharpe Ratio of 1.69. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DGRE and DGRW, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

DGRE vs. DGRW - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DGRE drawdown since its inception was -36.95%, which is greater than DGRW's maximum drawdown of -32.04%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DGRE and DGRW.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


DGREDGRWDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-36.95%

-32.04%

-4.91%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-13.68%

-8.30%

-5.38%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-20.65%

-16.21%

-4.44%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-33.43%

-17.27%

-16.16%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-36.95%

-32.04%

-4.91%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-8.09%

0.00%

-8.09%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-11.93%

-3.00%

-8.93%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.36%

2.05%

+2.31%

Volatility

DGRE vs. DGRW - Volatility Comparison

WisdomTree Emerging Markets Quality Dividend Growth Fund (DGRE) has a higher volatility of 9.02% compared to WisdomTree U.S. Quality Dividend Growth Fund (DGRW) at 3.19%. This indicates that DGRE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than DGRW based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


DGREDGRWDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

9.02%

3.19%

+5.83%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

22.59%

8.44%

+14.15%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

24.31%

10.47%

+13.84%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

19.08%

14.02%

+5.06%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.99%

16.19%

+3.80%

DGRE vs. DGRW - Expense Ratio Comparison

DGRE has a 0.32% expense ratio, which is higher than DGRW's 0.28% expense ratio.


Dividends

DGRE vs. DGRW - Dividend Comparison

DGRE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.33%, more than DGRW's 1.26% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
DGRE
WisdomTree Emerging Markets Quality Dividend Growth Fund
1.33%1.65%1.90%2.22%4.38%2.56%2.11%2.32%2.71%3.12%3.18%3.01%
DGRW
WisdomTree U.S. Quality Dividend Growth Fund
1.26%1.43%1.55%1.74%2.15%1.78%1.93%2.20%2.42%1.71%2.13%2.18%

Frequently Asked Questions


DGRE and DGRW have a correlation of 0.66, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

DGRE has higher volatility (9.02%) compared to DGRW (3.19%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DGRE dropped -36.95% vs DGRW's -32.04%.

On 10-year performance, DGRW leads with 13.79% vs 8.04% for DGRE. On fees, DGRW is cheaper at 0.28% per year. On volatility, DGRW has been the lower-risk option at 3.19%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, DGRW has performed better with a 13.79% return vs 8.04%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

DGRW is cheaper with a 0.28% expense ratio, compared with 0.32% for DGRE.

DGRE has the higher dividend yield at 1.33%, compared with 1.26% for DGRW.

Their fees differ too: 0.32% for DGRE and 0.28% for DGRW.

DGRE currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.82 vs 1.69), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for DGRE and DGRW

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer