LUN.TO vs. URA
LUN.TO (Lundin Mining Corporation) is a stock, while URA (Global X Uranium ETF) is Commodity Producers Equities fund tracking the Solactive Global Uranium & Nuclear Components Total Return Index. Over the past 10 years, LUN.TO returned 27.86%/yr vs 16.90%/yr for URA. At a 0.43 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
LUN.TO vs. URA - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
LUN.TO is traded in CAD, while URA is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the URA values have been converted to CAD using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, LUN.TO achieves a 28.54% return, which is significantly higher than URA's 8.80% return. Over the past 10 years, LUN.TO has outperformed URA with an annualized return of 27.86%, while URA has yielded a comparatively lower 16.90% annualized return.
LUN.TO
- 1D
- 2.69%
- 1M
- -9.84%
- YTD
- 28.54%
- 6M
- 39.35%
- 1Y
- 171.40%
- 3Y*
- 58.49%
- 5Y*
- 28.07%
- 10Y*
- 27.86%
URA
- 1D
- 1.83%
- 1M
- -12.81%
- YTD
- 8.80%
- 6M
- 5.16%
- 1Y
- 35.56%
- 3Y*
- 34.20%
- 5Y*
- 22.28%
- 10Y*
- 16.90%
LUN.TO vs. URA - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LUN.TO Lundin Mining Corporation | 28.54% | 141.86% | 17.72% | 35.67% | -11.74% | -9.34% | 49.12% | 40.12% | -31.40% | 32.67% |
URA Global X Uranium ETF | 8.80% | 59.55% | 7.84% | 42.77% | -5.70% | 57.50% | 37.98% | -7.52% | -15.56% | 11.28% |
Correlation
The correlation between LUN.TO and URA is 0.47, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.47 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.41 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.42 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.41 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 5, 2010 | 0.43 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
LUN.TO vs. URA — Risk / Return Rank
LUN.TO
URA
LUN.TO vs. URA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Lundin Mining Corporation (LUN.TO) and Global X Uranium ETF (URA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| LUN.TO | URA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +2.57 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +2.08 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.46 | 1.15 | +0.31 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 5.12 | 1.20 | +3.92 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 16.75 | 2.57 | +14.18 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
LUN.TO vs. URA - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum LUN.TO drawdown since its inception was -95.33%, which is greater than URA's maximum drawdown of -90.70%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LUN.TO and URA.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| LUN.TO | URA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -95.33% | -90.70% | -4.63% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -33.67% | -29.66% | -4.01% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -47.11% | -36.01% | -11.10% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -53.91% | -36.01% | -17.90% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -57.61% | -58.01% | +0.40% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -14.62% | -27.03% | +12.41% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -48.73% | -69.52% | +20.79% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 10.28% | 13.90% | -3.62% |
Volatility
LUN.TO vs. URA - Volatility Comparison
Lundin Mining Corporation (LUN.TO) has a higher volatility of 19.93% compared to Global X Uranium ETF (URA) at 17.86%. This indicates that LUN.TO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than URA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| LUN.TO | URA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 19.93% | 17.86% | +2.07% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 44.51% | 40.02% | +4.49% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 52.84% | 51.24% | +1.60% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 46.24% | 44.32% | +1.92% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 45.96% | 38.27% | +7.69% |
Dividends
LUN.TO vs. URA - Dividend Comparison
LUN.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.29%, less than URA's 4.58% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LUN.TO Lundin Mining Corporation | 0.29% | 0.68% | 3.64% | 3.32% | 5.66% | 3.95% | 1.42% | 1.55% | 2.13% | 1.44% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
URA Global X Uranium ETF | 4.58% | 4.88% | 2.86% | 6.07% | 0.76% | 5.84% | 1.69% | 1.66% | 0.44% | 2.03% | 7.28% | 1.96% |
Frequently Asked Questions
LUN.TO and URA have a correlation of 0.47, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
Find the right allocation for LUN.TO and URA
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer