URA vs. CCJ
URA (Global X Uranium ETF) is Uranium fund tracking the Solactive Global Uranium & Nuclear Components Total Return Index, while CCJ (Cameco Corporation) is a stock. Over the past 10 years, URA returned 15.78%/yr vs 26.93%/yr for CCJ. Their 0.79 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently.
Performance
URA vs. CCJ - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, URA achieves a 0.37% return, which is significantly lower than CCJ's 3.04% return. Over the past 10 years, URA has underperformed CCJ with an annualized return of 15.78%, while CCJ has yielded a comparatively higher 26.93% annualized return.
URA
- 1D
- 0.94%
- 1M
- -2.26%
- 6M
- -18.13%
- YTD
- 0.37%
- 1Y
- 11.15%
- 3Y*
- 30.00%
- 5Y*
- 21.89%
- 10Y*
- 15.78%
- ALL TIME*
- -2.78%
CCJ
- 1D
- 1.27%
- 1M
- -3.31%
- 6M
- -17.90%
- YTD
- 3.04%
- 1Y
- 26.63%
- 3Y*
- 41.46%
- 5Y*
- 40.80%
- 10Y*
- 26.93%
- ALL TIME*
- 9.59%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $327.31M | $349.54M | $345.52M | |
| $146.89M | $130.14M | $166.89M |
URA vs. CCJ - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
URA Global X Uranium ETF | 0.37% | 67.18% | -0.58% | 46.25% | -11.32% | 57.57% | 41.33% | -3.54% | -22.11% | 19.36% |
CCJ Cameco Corporation | 3.04% | 78.38% | 19.47% | 90.49% | 4.35% | 63.19% | 51.47% | -21.08% | 23.58% | -8.20% |
Correlation
The correlation between URA and CCJ is 0.89, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.89 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.90 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.90 |
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions. | 0.84 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 5, 2010 | 0.79 |
The correlation between URA and CCJ shifts across timeframes, from 0.79 (all time) to 0.90 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
URA vs. CCJ — Risk / Return Rank
URA
CCJ
URA vs. CCJ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X Uranium ETF (URA) and Cameco Corporation (CCJ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| URA | CCJ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.26 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.42 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.08 | 1.13 | -0.05 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.28 | 0.72 | -0.44 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.61 | 1.64 | -1.04 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
URA vs. CCJ - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum URA drawdown since its inception was -93.54%, which is greater than CCJ's maximum drawdown of -87.53%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for URA and CCJ.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| URA | CCJ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -93.54% | -87.53% | -6.01% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -39.30% | -36.93% | -2.37% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -39.30% | -40.01% | +0.71% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -39.30% | -40.01% | +0.71% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -61.45% | -57.22% | -4.23% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -51.33% | -29.70% | -21.63% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -74.73% | -45.99% | -28.74% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 18.44% | 16.26% | +2.18% |
Volatility
URA vs. CCJ - Volatility Comparison
Global X Uranium ETF (URA) has a higher volatility of 14.05% compared to Cameco Corporation (CCJ) at 13.00%. This indicates that URA's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CCJ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| URA | CCJ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 14.05% | 13.00% | +1.05% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 37.64% | 38.56% | -0.92% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 52.36% | 55.91% | -3.55% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 44.18% | 49.97% | -5.79% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 38.15% | 46.78% | -8.63% |
Dividends
URA vs. CCJ - Dividend Comparison
URA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.86%, more than CCJ's 0.18% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CCJ Cameco Corporation | 0.18% | 0.19% | 0.22% | 0.20% | 0.39% | 0.29% | 0.46% | 0.67% | 0.53% | 4.33% | 3.82% | 3.24% |
URA Global X Uranium ETF | 4.86% | 4.88% | 2.86% | 6.07% | 0.76% | 5.84% | 1.69% | 1.66% | 0.44% | 2.03% | 7.28% | 1.96% |
Frequently Asked Questions
URA and CCJ have a correlation of 0.89, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
URA has higher volatility (14.05%) compared to CCJ (13.00%). In terms of maximum drawdown, URA dropped -93.54% vs CCJ's -87.53%.
CCJ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.48 vs 0.21), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for URA and CCJ
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer