URA vs. CCJ
Compare and contrast key facts about Global X Uranium ETF (URA) and Cameco Corporation (CCJ).
URA is a passively managed fund by Global X that tracks the performance of the Solactive Global Uranium & Nuclear Components Index. It was launched on Nov 4, 2010.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: URA or CCJ.
Key characteristics
| URA | CCJ | |
|---|---|---|
| YTD Return | -16.22% | -14.25% |
| 1Y Return | 0.84% | -0.18% |
| 3Y Return (Ann) | 1.70% | 17.75% |
| 5Y Return (Ann) | 19.91% | 33.18% |
| 10Y Return (Ann) | 1.14% | 8.36% |
| Sharpe Ratio | 0.01 | 0.01 |
| Daily Std Dev | 35.64% | 43.18% |
| Max Drawdown | -93.54% | -87.86% |
| Current Drawdown | -75.56% | -33.42% |
Correlation
The correlation between URA and CCJ is 0.78, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Performance
URA vs. CCJ - Performance Comparison
In the year-to-date period, URA achieves a -16.22% return, which is significantly lower than CCJ's -14.25% return. Over the past 10 years, URA has underperformed CCJ with an annualized return of 1.14%, while CCJ has yielded a comparatively higher 8.36% annualized return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
URA vs. CCJ - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X Uranium ETF (URA) and Cameco Corporation (CCJ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
URA vs. CCJ - Dividend Comparison
URA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.36%, more than CCJ's 0.24% yield.
| TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
URA Global X Uranium ETF | 7.36% | 6.07% | 0.76% | 5.84% | 1.69% | 1.66% | 0.44% | 2.03% | 7.28% | 1.96% | 4.28% | 0.54% |
CCJ Cameco Corporation | 0.24% | 0.20% | 0.39% | 0.29% | 0.46% | 0.68% | 0.53% | 3.37% | 2.88% | 2.49% | 2.19% | 1.85% |
Drawdowns
URA vs. CCJ - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum URA drawdown since its inception was -93.54%, which is greater than CCJ's maximum drawdown of -87.86%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for URA and CCJ. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
URA vs. CCJ - Volatility Comparison
Global X Uranium ETF (URA) and Cameco Corporation (CCJ) have volatilities of 11.96% and 12.54%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.