URA vs. CCJ
Compare and contrast key facts about Global X Uranium ETF (URA) and Cameco Corporation (CCJ).
URA is a passively managed fund by Global X that tracks the performance of the Solactive Global Uranium & Nuclear Components Index. It was launched on Nov 4, 2010.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: URA or CCJ.
Correlation
The correlation between URA and CCJ is 0.47, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Performance
URA vs. CCJ - Performance Comparison
Loading data...
Key characteristics
URA:
-0.18
CCJ:
0.15
URA:
0.00
CCJ:
0.47
URA:
1.00
CCJ:
1.06
URA:
-0.09
CCJ:
0.12
URA:
-0.41
CCJ:
0.24
URA:
17.69%
CCJ:
20.00%
URA:
39.19%
CCJ:
47.54%
URA:
-93.54%
CCJ:
-87.86%
URA:
-69.51%
CCJ:
-12.82%
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, URA achieves a 5.12% return, which is significantly higher than CCJ's 3.72% return. Over the past 10 years, URA has underperformed CCJ with an annualized return of 4.83%, while CCJ has yielded a comparatively higher 13.19% annualized return.
URA
5.12%
23.25%
-4.14%
-7.07%
26.51%
4.83%
CCJ
3.72%
29.02%
0.80%
6.85%
40.85%
13.19%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
URA vs. CCJ — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank
URA
CCJ
URA vs. CCJ - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X Uranium ETF (URA) and Cameco Corporation (CCJ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Loading data...
Dividends
URA vs. CCJ - Dividend Comparison
URA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.72%, more than CCJ's 0.21% yield.
| TTM | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
URA Global X Uranium ETF | 2.72% | 2.86% | 6.07% | 0.76% | 5.84% | 1.69% | 1.66% | 0.44% | 2.03% | 7.28% | 1.96% | 4.28% |
CCJ Cameco Corporation | 0.21% | 0.22% | 0.20% | 0.39% | 0.29% | 0.46% | 0.68% | 0.53% | 3.37% | 2.88% | 2.49% | 2.19% |
Drawdowns
URA vs. CCJ - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum URA drawdown since its inception was -93.54%, which is greater than CCJ's maximum drawdown of -87.86%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for URA and CCJ. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Loading data...
Volatility
URA vs. CCJ - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Global X Uranium ETF (URA) is 7.21%, while Cameco Corporation (CCJ) has a volatility of 9.93%. This indicates that URA experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CCJ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading data...