URA vs. CCJ
Compare and contrast key facts about Global X Uranium ETF (URA) and Cameco Corporation (CCJ).
URA is a passively managed fund by Global X that tracks the performance of the Solactive Global Uranium & Nuclear Components Index. It was launched on Nov 4, 2010.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: URA or CCJ.
Correlation
The correlation between URA and CCJ is 0.78, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Performance
URA vs. CCJ - Performance Comparison
Key characteristics
URA:
-0.83
CCJ:
-0.51
URA:
-1.06
CCJ:
-0.46
URA:
0.87
CCJ:
0.94
URA:
-0.41
CCJ:
-0.63
URA:
-2.04
CCJ:
-1.35
URA:
15.56%
CCJ:
17.74%
URA:
38.18%
CCJ:
46.73%
URA:
-93.54%
CCJ:
-87.86%
URA:
-77.45%
CCJ:
-38.13%
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, URA achieves a -22.26% return, which is significantly higher than CCJ's -26.39% return. Over the past 10 years, URA has underperformed CCJ with an annualized return of 3.19%, while CCJ has yielded a comparatively higher 11.13% annualized return.
URA
-22.26%
-15.61%
-29.47%
-29.15%
23.02%
3.19%
CCJ
-26.39%
-12.00%
-26.88%
-21.62%
35.18%
11.13%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
URA vs. CCJ — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank
URA
CCJ
URA vs. CCJ - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X Uranium ETF (URA) and Cameco Corporation (CCJ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
URA vs. CCJ - Dividend Comparison
URA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.68%, more than CCJ's 0.30% yield.
| TTM | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
URA Global X Uranium ETF | 3.68% | 2.86% | 6.07% | 0.76% | 5.85% | 1.69% | 1.66% | 0.45% | 2.03% | 7.28% | 1.96% | 4.28% |
CCJ Cameco Corporation | 0.30% | 0.22% | 0.20% | 0.39% | 0.29% | 0.46% | 0.67% | 0.53% | 3.36% | 2.88% | 2.50% | 2.19% |
Drawdowns
URA vs. CCJ - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum URA drawdown since its inception was -93.54%, which is greater than CCJ's maximum drawdown of -87.86%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for URA and CCJ. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
URA vs. CCJ - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Global X Uranium ETF (URA) is 11.62%, while Cameco Corporation (CCJ) has a volatility of 12.35%. This indicates that URA experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CCJ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.