URA vs. CCJ
Compare and contrast key facts about Global X Uranium ETF (URA) and Cameco Corporation (CCJ).
URA is a passively managed fund by Global X that tracks the performance of the Solactive Global Uranium & Nuclear Components Index. It was launched on Nov 4, 2010.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: URA or CCJ.
Correlation
The correlation between URA and CCJ is 0.78, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Performance
URA vs. CCJ - Performance Comparison
Key characteristics
URA:
-0.16
CCJ:
0.18
URA:
0.01
CCJ:
0.56
URA:
1.00
CCJ:
1.07
URA:
-0.08
CCJ:
0.24
URA:
-0.45
CCJ:
0.54
URA:
13.08%
CCJ:
14.66%
URA:
35.59%
CCJ:
44.25%
URA:
-93.54%
CCJ:
-87.87%
URA:
-69.64%
CCJ:
-15.55%
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, URA achieves a 4.67% return, which is significantly higher than CCJ's 0.47% return. Over the past 10 years, URA has underperformed CCJ with an annualized return of 6.27%, while CCJ has yielded a comparatively higher 14.99% annualized return.
URA
4.67%
3.56%
2.09%
-6.39%
24.87%
6.27%
CCJ
0.47%
-2.42%
10.94%
10.09%
42.79%
14.99%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
URA vs. CCJ — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank
URA
CCJ
URA vs. CCJ - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X Uranium ETF (URA) and Cameco Corporation (CCJ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
URA vs. CCJ - Dividend Comparison
URA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.73%, more than CCJ's 0.22% yield.
| TTM | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
URA Global X Uranium ETF | 2.73% | 2.86% | 6.07% | 0.76% | 5.85% | 1.69% | 1.66% | 0.45% | 2.03% | 7.28% | 1.96% | 4.28% |
CCJ Cameco Corporation | 0.22% | 0.22% | 0.20% | 0.39% | 0.29% | 0.46% | 0.67% | 0.53% | 3.36% | 2.88% | 2.50% | 2.19% |
Drawdowns
URA vs. CCJ - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum URA drawdown since its inception was -93.54%, which is greater than CCJ's maximum drawdown of -87.87%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for URA and CCJ. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
URA vs. CCJ - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Global X Uranium ETF (URA) is 9.21%, while Cameco Corporation (CCJ) has a volatility of 10.83%. This indicates that URA experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CCJ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.