URA vs. NLR
Compare and contrast key facts about Global X Uranium ETF (URA) and VanEck Vectors Uranium+Nuclear Energy ETF (NLR).
URA and NLR are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. URA is a passively managed fund by Global X that tracks the performance of the Solactive Global Uranium & Nuclear Components Index. It was launched on Nov 4, 2010. NLR is a passively managed fund by VanEck that tracks the performance of the DAXglobal Nuclear Energy Index. It was launched on Aug 13, 2007. Both URA and NLR are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: URA or NLR.
Correlation
The correlation between URA and NLR is 0.54, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Performance
URA vs. NLR - Performance Comparison
Key characteristics
URA:
-0.32
NLR:
0.06
URA:
-0.20
NLR:
0.33
URA:
0.98
NLR:
1.04
URA:
-0.17
NLR:
0.07
URA:
-0.74
NLR:
0.17
URA:
17.32%
NLR:
12.73%
URA:
39.81%
NLR:
34.39%
URA:
-93.54%
NLR:
-66.96%
URA:
-72.92%
NLR:
-17.95%
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, URA achieves a -6.65% return, which is significantly lower than NLR's -2.95% return. Over the past 10 years, URA has underperformed NLR with an annualized return of 3.85%, while NLR has yielded a comparatively higher 8.12% annualized return.
URA
-6.65%
9.08%
-17.96%
-10.67%
22.89%
3.85%
NLR
-2.95%
7.74%
-13.60%
3.64%
16.38%
8.12%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
URA vs. NLR - Expense Ratio Comparison
URA has a 0.69% expense ratio, which is higher than NLR's 0.60% expense ratio.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
URA vs. NLR — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank
URA
NLR
URA vs. NLR - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X Uranium ETF (URA) and VanEck Vectors Uranium+Nuclear Energy ETF (NLR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
URA vs. NLR - Dividend Comparison
URA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.06%, more than NLR's 0.78% yield.
| TTM | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
URA Global X Uranium ETF | 3.06% | 2.86% | 6.07% | 0.76% | 5.85% | 1.69% | 1.66% | 0.45% | 2.03% | 7.28% | 1.96% | 4.28% |
NLR VanEck Vectors Uranium+Nuclear Energy ETF | 0.78% | 0.75% | 4.54% | 2.02% | 1.99% | 2.23% | 2.43% | 3.91% | 4.86% | 3.62% | 3.30% | 2.48% |
Drawdowns
URA vs. NLR - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum URA drawdown since its inception was -93.54%, which is greater than NLR's maximum drawdown of -66.96%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for URA and NLR. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
URA vs. NLR - Volatility Comparison
Global X Uranium ETF (URA) has a higher volatility of 15.19% compared to VanEck Vectors Uranium+Nuclear Energy ETF (NLR) at 14.15%. This indicates that URA's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than NLR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.