LULU vs. MAR

Last updated Jun 13, 2026

LULU (Lululemon Athletica Inc.) and MAR (Marriott International, Inc.) are both stocks. Both are in the Consumer Cyclical sector — LULU in Apparel Retail, MAR in Lodging. Over the past 10 years, LULU returned 5.37%/yr vs 21.03%/yr for MAR. At a 0.40 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.

Performance

LULU vs. MAR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Lululemon Athletica Inc. (LULU) and Marriott International, Inc. (MAR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LULU achieves a -42.85% return, which is significantly lower than MAR's 30.26% return. Over the past 10 years, LULU has underperformed MAR with an annualized return of 5.37%, while MAR has yielded a comparatively higher 21.03% annualized return.

LULU

• 1D: -2.52%
• 1M: -2.01%
• YTD: -42.85%
• 6M: -42.05%
• 1Y: -51.92%
• 3Y*: -31.43%
• 5Y*: -18.89%
• 10Y*: 5.37%

MAR

• 1D: 1.42%
• 1M: 15.18%
• YTD: 30.26%
• 6M: 35.28%
• 1Y: 54.28%
• 3Y*: 31.68%
• 5Y*: 23.91%
• 10Y*: 21.03%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

LULU vs. MAR - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
LULU Lululemon Athletica Inc.	-42.85%	-45.66%	-25.21%	59.59%	-18.16%	12.48%	50.23%	90.50%	54.74%	20.93%
MAR Marriott International, Inc.	30.26%	12.31%	24.92%	53.06%	-9.34%	25.26%	-12.53%	41.49%	-19.05%	66.24%

Correlation

The correlation between LULU and MAR is 0.43, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.43
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.39
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.40
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.35
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 27, 2007	0.40

Fundamentals

EPS LULU : $12.35 MAR : $12.66
PE Ratio LULU : 9.62 MAR : 31.80
PEG Ratio LULU : 0.47 MAR : 0.83
PS Ratio LULU : 1.25 MAR : 3.78
Total Revenue (TTM) LULU : $11.20B MAR : $21.73B
Gross Profit (TTM) LULU : $6.24B MAR : $1.31B
EBITDA (TTM) LULU : $2.44B MAR : $3.81B

Return for Risk

LULU vs. MAR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

LULU

LULU Risk / Return Rank: 3
LULU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3
LULU Sortino Ratio Rank: 4
LULU Omega Ratio Rank: 4
LULU Calmar Ratio Rank: 3
LULU Martin Ratio Rank: 3

MAR

MAR Risk / Return Rank: 89
MAR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 90
MAR Sortino Ratio Rank: 90
MAR Omega Ratio Rank: 86
MAR Calmar Ratio Rank: 91
MAR Martin Ratio Rank: 90

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

LULU vs. MAR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Lululemon Athletica Inc. (LULU) and Marriott International, Inc. (MAR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	LULU	MAR	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	-1.17	2.07	-3.25
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	-1.74	3.04	-4.79
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.78	1.35	-0.57
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.97	4.31	-5.28
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	-1.72	10.89	-12.61

LULU vs. MAR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current LULU Sharpe Ratio is -1.17, which is lower than the MAR Sharpe Ratio of 2.07. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LULU and MAR, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

LULU vs. MAR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LULU drawdown since its inception was -92.26%, which is greater than MAR's maximum drawdown of -75.59%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LULU and MAR.

Drawdown Indicators

	LULU	MAR	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-92.26%	-75.59%	-16.67%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-53.88%	-12.65%	-41.23%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-77.66%	-30.50%	-47.16%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-77.66%	-30.50%	-47.16%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-77.66%	-61.26%	-16.40%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-76.77%	0.00%	-76.77%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-27.61%	-14.90%	-12.71%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	30.26%	5.01%	+25.25%

Volatility

LULU vs. MAR - Volatility Comparison

Lululemon Athletica Inc. (LULU) has a higher volatility of 13.47% compared to Marriott International, Inc. (MAR) at 6.92%. This indicates that LULU's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MAR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	LULU	MAR	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	13.47%	6.92%	+6.55%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	32.76%	19.94%	+12.82%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	44.48%	26.32%	+18.16%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	42.22%	28.84%	+13.38%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	40.62%	32.90%	+7.72%

Dividends

LULU vs. MAR - Dividend Comparison

LULU has not paid dividends to shareholders, while MAR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.68%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
LULU Lululemon Athletica Inc.	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
MAR Marriott International, Inc.	0.68%	0.85%	0.86%	0.87%	0.67%	0.00%	0.36%	1.22%	1.44%	0.95%	1.39%	1.42%

Financials

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both LULU and MAR in my portfolio?

LULU and MAR have a correlation of 0.43, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, LULU or MAR?

LULU has higher volatility (13.47%) compared to MAR (6.92%). In terms of maximum drawdown, LULU dropped -92.26% vs MAR's -75.59%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

MAR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.07 vs -1.17), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.