LULU vs. CROX
Compare and contrast key facts about Lululemon Athletica Inc. (LULU) and Crocs, Inc. (CROX).
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: LULU or CROX.
Correlation
The correlation between LULU and CROX is 0.43, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Performance
LULU vs. CROX - Performance Comparison
Key characteristics
LULU:
-0.66
CROX:
-0.49
LULU:
-0.79
CROX:
-0.50
LULU:
0.90
CROX:
0.94
LULU:
-0.49
CROX:
-0.46
LULU:
-1.31
CROX:
-0.97
LULU:
20.36%
CROX:
24.17%
LULU:
40.16%
CROX:
47.57%
LULU:
-92.24%
CROX:
-98.74%
LULU:
-44.70%
CROX:
-38.23%
Fundamentals
LULU:
$34.11B
CROX:
$6.25B
LULU:
$14.65
CROX:
$15.88
LULU:
19.30
CROX:
7.02
LULU:
1.07
CROX:
-31.83
LULU:
$10.59B
CROX:
$3.16B
LULU:
$6.27B
CROX:
$1.89B
LULU:
$2.84B
CROX:
$848.94M
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, LULU achieves a -26.06% return, which is significantly lower than CROX's 1.84% return. Over the past 10 years, LULU has underperformed CROX with an annualized return of 16.17%, while CROX has yielded a comparatively higher 25.05% annualized return.
LULU
-26.06%
-18.71%
8.53%
-25.21%
9.34%
16.17%
CROX
1.84%
11.12%
-20.78%
-21.26%
50.20%
25.05%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
LULU vs. CROX — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank
LULU
CROX
LULU vs. CROX - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Lululemon Athletica Inc. (LULU) and Crocs, Inc. (CROX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
LULU vs. CROX - Dividend Comparison
Neither LULU nor CROX has paid dividends to shareholders.
Drawdowns
LULU vs. CROX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum LULU drawdown since its inception was -92.24%, smaller than the maximum CROX drawdown of -98.74%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LULU and CROX. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
LULU vs. CROX - Volatility Comparison
Lululemon Athletica Inc. (LULU) has a higher volatility of 18.25% compared to Crocs, Inc. (CROX) at 12.84%. This indicates that LULU's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CROX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Financials
LULU vs. CROX - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Lululemon Athletica Inc. and Crocs, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities