PortfoliosLab logo
PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Portfolio Analysis
Factor Model
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Discussions
LULU vs. CROX
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Financials

Performance

LULU vs. CROX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Lululemon Athletica Inc. (LULU) and Crocs, Inc. (CROX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

0.00%200.00%400.00%600.00%800.00%1,000.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
1,042.89%
76.43%
LULU
CROX

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LULU achieves a -37.41% return, which is significantly lower than CROX's 4.68% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with LULU having a 21.78% annualized return and CROX not far ahead at 22.63%.


LULU

YTD

-37.41%

1M

8.77%

6M

-4.46%

1Y

-23.86%

5Y (annualized)

8.20%

10Y (annualized)

21.78%

CROX

YTD

4.68%

1M

-29.86%

6M

-30.63%

1Y

7.24%

5Y (annualized)

23.03%

10Y (annualized)

22.63%

Fundamentals


LULUCROX
Market Cap$39.40B$5.94B
EPS$12.93$13.76
PE Ratio24.827.41
PEG Ratio1.56-31.83
Total Revenue (TTM)$7.79B$4.07B
Gross Profit (TTM)$4.59B$2.37B
EBITDA (TTM)$2.28B$1.09B

Key characteristics


LULUCROX
Sharpe Ratio-0.730.20
Sortino Ratio-0.840.65
Omega Ratio0.881.08
Calmar Ratio-0.480.18
Martin Ratio-0.760.70
Ulcer Index34.10%13.20%
Daily Std Dev35.50%46.86%
Max Drawdown-92.24%-98.74%
Current Drawdown-37.41%-45.85%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Correlation

-0.50.00.51.00.4

The correlation between LULU and CROX is 0.43, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.

Risk-Adjusted Performance

LULU vs. CROX - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Lululemon Athletica Inc. (LULU) and Crocs, Inc. (CROX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for LULU, currently valued at -0.73, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.00-0.730.20
The chart of Sortino ratio for LULU, currently valued at -0.84, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.00-0.840.65
The chart of Omega ratio for LULU, currently valued at 0.88, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.000.881.08
The chart of Calmar ratio for LULU, currently valued at -0.48, compared to the broader market0.002.004.006.00-0.480.18
The chart of Martin ratio for LULU, currently valued at -0.76, compared to the broader market0.0010.0020.0030.00-0.760.70
LULU
CROX

The current LULU Sharpe Ratio is -0.73, which is lower than the CROX Sharpe Ratio of 0.20. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LULU and CROX, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio-1.00-0.500.000.501.001.50JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
-0.73
0.20
LULU
CROX

Dividends

LULU vs. CROX - Dividend Comparison

Neither LULU nor CROX has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Drawdowns

LULU vs. CROX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LULU drawdown since its inception was -92.24%, smaller than the maximum CROX drawdown of -98.74%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LULU and CROX. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-50.00%-40.00%-30.00%-20.00%-10.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
-37.41%
-45.85%
LULU
CROX

Volatility

LULU vs. CROX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Lululemon Athletica Inc. (LULU) is 10.96%, while Crocs, Inc. (CROX) has a volatility of 22.46%. This indicates that LULU experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CROX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


5.00%10.00%15.00%20.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
10.96%
22.46%
LULU
CROX

Financials

LULU vs. CROX - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Lululemon Athletica Inc. and Crocs, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


Values in USD except per share items