PortfoliosLab logo
LULU vs. CROX
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Financials

Correlation

The correlation between LULU and CROX is 0.52, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


Performance

LULU vs. CROX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Lululemon Athletica Inc. (LULU) and Crocs, Inc. (CROX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading data...

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

LULU:

0.10

CROX:

-0.66

Sortino Ratio

LULU:

0.55

CROX:

-0.79

Omega Ratio

LULU:

1.07

CROX:

0.90

Calmar Ratio

LULU:

0.13

CROX:

-0.67

Martin Ratio

LULU:

0.39

CROX:

-1.22

Ulcer Index

LULU:

18.50%

CROX:

28.00%

Daily Std Dev

LULU:

44.02%

CROX:

52.64%

Max Drawdown

LULU:

-92.26%

CROX:

-98.74%

Current Drawdown

LULU:

-38.06%

CROX:

-43.51%

Fundamentals

Market Cap

LULU:

$37.94B

CROX:

$5.99B

EPS

LULU:

$14.71

CROX:

$15.76

PE Ratio

LULU:

21.56

CROX:

6.59

PEG Ratio

LULU:

1.30

CROX:

-31.83

PS Ratio

LULU:

3.58

CROX:

1.46

PB Ratio

LULU:

9.15

CROX:

2.96

Total Revenue (TTM)

LULU:

$8.38B

CROX:

$4.10B

Gross Profit (TTM)

LULU:

$5.00B

CROX:

$2.43B

EBITDA (TTM)

LULU:

$2.31B

CROX:

$1.10B

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LULU achieves a -17.19% return, which is significantly lower than CROX's -6.87% return. Over the past 10 years, LULU has underperformed CROX with an annualized return of 18.14%, while CROX has yielded a comparatively higher 21.10% annualized return.


LULU

YTD

-17.19%

1M

16.95%

6M

-1.24%

1Y

4.55%

3Y*

2.66%

5Y*

1.08%

10Y*

18.14%

CROX

YTD

-6.87%

1M

5.79%

6M

-3.41%

1Y

-34.60%

3Y*

22.30%

5Y*

28.91%

10Y*

21.10%

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Lululemon Athletica Inc.

Crocs, Inc.

Go deeper with the Portfolio Analysis tool — backtest performance, assess risk, compare to benchmarks, and more

Risk-Adjusted Performance

LULU vs. CROX — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

LULU
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of LULU is 5555
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of LULU is 5454
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of LULU is 5252
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of LULU is 5252
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of LULU is 5858
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of LULU is 5757
Martin Ratio Rank

CROX
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of CROX is 1414
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of CROX is 1414
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of CROX is 1515
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of CROX is 1717
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of CROX is 1010
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of CROX is 1616
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

LULU vs. CROX - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Lululemon Athletica Inc. (LULU) and Crocs, Inc. (CROX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


The current LULU Sharpe Ratio is 0.10, which is higher than the CROX Sharpe Ratio of -0.66. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LULU and CROX, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading data...

Go to the full Sharpe Ratio tool to analyze any stock or portfolio. Customize time frames, set your own risk-free rate, and more

Dividends

LULU vs. CROX - Dividend Comparison

Neither LULU nor CROX has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Drawdowns

LULU vs. CROX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LULU drawdown since its inception was -92.26%, smaller than the maximum CROX drawdown of -98.74%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LULU and CROX.


Loading data...

Go to the full Drawdowns tool for more analysis options, including inflation-adjusted drawdowns, and more

Volatility

LULU vs. CROX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Lululemon Athletica Inc. (LULU) is 11.73%, while Crocs, Inc. (CROX) has a volatility of 15.38%. This indicates that LULU experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CROX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading data...

Financials

LULU vs. CROX - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Lululemon Athletica Inc. and Crocs, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.001.00B2.00B3.00B4.00BJulyOctober2021AprilJulyOctober2022AprilJulyOctober2023AprilJulyOctober2024AprilJulyOctober2025
3.61B
937.33M
(LULU) Total Revenue
(CROX) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

LULU vs. CROX - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Lululemon Athletica Inc. and Crocs, Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

50.0%55.0%60.0%JulyOctober2021AprilJulyOctober2022AprilJulyOctober2023AprilJulyOctober2024AprilJulyOctober2025
60.4%
57.8%
(LULU) Gross Margin
(CROX) Gross Margin
LULU - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Lululemon Athletica Inc. reported a gross profit of 2.18B and revenue of 3.61B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 60.4%.

CROX - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Crocs, Inc. reported a gross profit of 541.55M and revenue of 937.33M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 57.8%.

LULU - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Lululemon Athletica Inc. reported an operating income of 1.04B and revenue of 3.61B, resulting in an operating margin of 28.9%.

CROX - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Crocs, Inc. reported an operating income of 222.97M and revenue of 937.33M, resulting in an operating margin of 23.8%.

LULU - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Lululemon Athletica Inc. reported a net income of 748.40M and revenue of 3.61B, resulting in a net margin of 20.7%.

CROX - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Crocs, Inc. reported a net income of 160.10M and revenue of 937.33M, resulting in a net margin of 17.1%.