LULU vs. CROX

In the year-to-date period, LULU achieves a -29.94% return, which is significantly lower than CROX's -10.82% return. Over the past 10 years, LULU has underperformed CROX with an annualized return of 15.31%, while CROX has yielded a comparatively higher 21.95% annualized return.

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Lululemon Athletica Inc. (LULU) and Crocs, Inc. (CROX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

The current LULU Sharpe Ratio is -0.61, which is lower than the CROX Sharpe Ratio of -0.44. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LULU and CROX, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Neither LULU nor CROX has paid dividends to shareholders.

The maximum LULU drawdown since its inception was -92.24%, smaller than the maximum CROX drawdown of -98.74%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LULU and CROX. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.

Lululemon Athletica Inc. (LULU) and Crocs, Inc. (CROX) have volatilities of 24.14% and 23.88%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Lululemon Athletica Inc. and Crocs, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.