PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
LTR.AX vs. ALB
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

LTR.AX vs. ALB - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a A$10,000 investment in Liontown Resources Limited (LTR.AX) and Albemarle Corporation (ALB). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

LTR.AX is traded in AUD, while ALB is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the ALB values have been converted to AUD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LTR.AX achieves a 53.65% return, which is significantly higher than ALB's 11.68% return. Over the past 10 years, LTR.AX has outperformed ALB with an annualized return of 59.01%, while ALB has yielded a comparatively lower 9.55% annualized return.


LTR.AX

1D
-3.20%
1M
0.00%
YTD
53.65%
6M
80.60%
1Y
320.87%
3Y*
-4.29%
5Y*
32.13%
10Y*
59.01%

ALB

1D
-1.54%
1M
-11.25%
YTD
11.68%
6M
23.91%
1Y
172.50%
3Y*
-7.82%
5Y*
2.25%
10Y*
9.55%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

LTR.AX vs. ALB - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
LTR.AX
Liontown Resources Limited
53.65%200.00%-68.18%25.00%-20.48%403.79%290.87%264.94%-44.97%159.51%
ALB
Albemarle Corporation
11.68%55.54%-33.41%-32.75%-0.46%69.12%87.35%-2.83%-32.34%38.77%

Correlation

The correlation between LTR.AX and ALB is 0.33, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.33

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.20

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.16

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.10

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 2, 2007

0.04

Over the past year, LTR.AX and ALB have become more correlated (0.33) than their long-term average of 0.04, meaning their price movements have been converging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

LTR.AX vs. ALB — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

LTR.AX
LTR.AX Risk / Return Rank: 9595
Overall Rank
LTR.AX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9797
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LTR.AX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9292
Sortino Ratio Rank
LTR.AX Omega Ratio Rank: 9090
Omega Ratio Rank
LTR.AX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9797
Calmar Ratio Rank
LTR.AX Martin Ratio Rank: 9696
Martin Ratio Rank

ALB
ALB Risk / Return Rank: 9393
Overall Rank
ALB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9595
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ALB Sortino Ratio Rank: 9090
Sortino Ratio Rank
ALB Omega Ratio Rank: 8989
Omega Ratio Rank
ALB Calmar Ratio Rank: 9797
Calmar Ratio Rank
ALB Martin Ratio Rank: 9595
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

LTR.AX vs. ALB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Liontown Resources Limited (LTR.AX) and Albemarle Corporation (ALB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


LTR.AXALBDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.03

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.49

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.43

1.40

+0.04

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

9.13

8.03

+1.10

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

22.75

18.34

+4.41

LTR.AX vs. ALB - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current LTR.AX Sharpe Ratio is 3.95, which is higher than the ALB Sharpe Ratio of 2.93. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LTR.AX and ALB, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


LTR.AXALBDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.95

2.93

+1.03

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.40

0.04

+0.36

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.58

0.21

+0.37

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.14

0.26

-0.12

Drawdowns

LTR.AX vs. ALB - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LTR.AX drawdown since its inception was -98.56%, which is greater than ALB's maximum drawdown of -82.45%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LTR.AX and ALB.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


LTR.AXALBDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-98.56%

-82.45%

-16.11%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-34.62%

-21.60%

-13.02%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-86.19%

-76.43%

-9.76%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-86.19%

-82.45%

-3.74%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-86.19%

-82.45%

-3.74%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-23.17%

-48.90%

+25.73%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-67.70%

-23.74%

-43.96%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

13.95%

9.45%

+4.50%

Volatility

LTR.AX vs. ALB - Volatility Comparison

Liontown Resources Limited (LTR.AX) has a higher volatility of 15.60% compared to Albemarle Corporation (ALB) at 11.03%. This indicates that LTR.AX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ALB based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


LTR.AXALBDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

15.60%

11.03%

+4.57%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

52.27%

39.40%

+12.87%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

80.02%

59.43%

+20.59%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

79.72%

51.56%

+28.16%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

101.88%

45.89%

+55.99%

Dividends

LTR.AX vs. ALB - Dividend Comparison

LTR.AX has not paid dividends to shareholders, while ALB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.96%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
ALB
Albemarle Corporation
0.96%1.15%1.87%1.11%0.73%0.67%1.04%2.01%1.74%1.00%1.42%2.07%
LTR.AX
Liontown Resources Limited
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%1.04%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Financials

LTR.AX vs. ALB - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Liontown Resources Limited and Albemarle Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


Please note, different currencies. LTR.AX values in AUD, ALB values in USD

Frequently Asked Questions


LTR.AX and ALB have a correlation of 0.33, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for LTR.AX and ALB

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer