PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
LTR.AX vs. III.TO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

LTR.AX vs. III.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a A$10,000 investment in Liontown Resources Limited (LTR.AX) and Imperial Metals Corporation (III.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

LTR.AX is traded in AUD, while III.TO is traded in CAD. To make them comparable, the III.TO values have been converted to AUD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LTR.AX achieves a 53.65% return, which is significantly higher than III.TO's -36.03% return. Over the past 10 years, LTR.AX has outperformed III.TO with an annualized return of 59.01%, while III.TO has yielded a comparatively lower 1.46% annualized return.


LTR.AX

1D
-3.20%
1M
0.00%
YTD
53.65%
6M
80.60%
1Y
320.87%
3Y*
-4.29%
5Y*
32.13%
10Y*
59.01%

III.TO

1D
-3.02%
1M
6.21%
YTD
-36.03%
6M
-16.78%
1Y
28.54%
3Y*
49.35%
5Y*
5.62%
10Y*
1.46%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

LTR.AX vs. III.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
LTR.AX
Liontown Resources Limited
53.65%200.00%-68.18%25.00%-20.48%403.79%290.87%264.94%-44.97%159.51%
III.TO
Imperial Metals Corporation
-36.03%433.97%-15.37%23.28%-43.20%-33.71%130.35%40.19%-53.31%-44.75%

Correlation

The correlation between LTR.AX and III.TO is 0.16, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.16

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.09

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.07

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.02

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 6, 2009

0.03

The correlation between LTR.AX and III.TO shifts across timeframes, from 0.02 (10 years) to 0.16 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

LTR.AX vs. III.TO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

LTR.AX
LTR.AX Risk / Return Rank: 9595
Overall Rank
LTR.AX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9797
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LTR.AX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9292
Sortino Ratio Rank
LTR.AX Omega Ratio Rank: 9090
Omega Ratio Rank
LTR.AX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9797
Calmar Ratio Rank
LTR.AX Martin Ratio Rank: 9696
Martin Ratio Rank

III.TO
III.TO Risk / Return Rank: 6161
Overall Rank
III.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6565
Sharpe Ratio Rank
III.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 6161
Sortino Ratio Rank
III.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 6161
Omega Ratio Rank
III.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 5858
Calmar Ratio Rank
III.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 5858
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

LTR.AX vs. III.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Liontown Resources Limited (LTR.AX) and Imperial Metals Corporation (III.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


LTR.AXIII.TODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+3.45

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+2.56

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.43

1.13

+0.30

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

9.13

0.51

+8.62

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

22.75

1.13

+21.62

LTR.AX vs. III.TO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current LTR.AX Sharpe Ratio is 3.95, which is higher than the III.TO Sharpe Ratio of 0.51. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LTR.AX and III.TO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


LTR.AXIII.TODifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.95

0.51

+3.45

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.40

0.11

+0.29

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.58

0.02

+0.55

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.14

0.11

+0.03

Drawdowns

LTR.AX vs. III.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LTR.AX drawdown since its inception was -98.56%, roughly equal to the maximum III.TO drawdown of -94.33%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LTR.AX and III.TO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


LTR.AXIII.TODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-98.56%

-94.33%

-4.23%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-34.62%

-55.80%

+21.18%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-86.19%

-55.80%

-30.39%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-86.19%

-66.31%

-19.88%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-86.19%

-86.96%

+0.77%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-23.17%

-61.97%

+38.80%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-67.70%

-57.97%

-9.73%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

13.95%

25.41%

-11.46%

Volatility

LTR.AX vs. III.TO - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Liontown Resources Limited (LTR.AX) is 15.60%, while Imperial Metals Corporation (III.TO) has a volatility of 19.63%. This indicates that LTR.AX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than III.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


LTR.AXIII.TODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

15.60%

19.63%

-4.03%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

52.27%

45.15%

+7.12%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

80.02%

56.73%

+23.29%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

79.72%

51.86%

+27.86%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

101.88%

61.98%

+39.90%

Dividends

LTR.AX vs. III.TO - Dividend Comparison

Neither LTR.AX nor III.TO has paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018
III.TO
Imperial Metals Corporation
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
LTR.AX
Liontown Resources Limited
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%1.04%

Financials

LTR.AX vs. III.TO - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Liontown Resources Limited and Imperial Metals Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


Please note, different currencies. LTR.AX values in AUD, III.TO values in CAD

Frequently Asked Questions


LTR.AX and III.TO have a correlation of 0.16, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for LTR.AX and III.TO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer