LSF vs. WAVE

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

LSF (Laird Superfood, Inc.) and WAVE (Eco Wave Power Global AB (publ)) are both stocks. LSF operates in Packaged Foods (Consumer Defensive), while WAVE operates in Utilities - Renewable (Utilities). Over the past 3 years, LSF returned 64.24%/yr vs 42.42%/yr for WAVE. At a 0.08 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.

Performance

LSF vs. WAVE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Laird Superfood, Inc. (LSF) and Eco Wave Power Global AB (publ) (WAVE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LSF achieves a 43.69% return, which is significantly lower than WAVE's 64.23% return.

LSF

• 1D: -5.06%
• 1M: 2.90%
• YTD: 43.69%
• 6M: 30.20%
• 1Y: -50.92%
• 3Y*: 64.24%
• 5Y*: -37.13%
• 10Y*: —

WAVE

• 1D: -3.23%
• 1M: 14.30%
• YTD: 64.23%
• 6M: 40.20%
• 1Y: 63.37%
• 3Y*: 42.42%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

LSF vs. WAVE - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
LSF Laird Superfood, Inc.	43.69%	-71.83%	765.93%	8.33%	-93.56%	-55.62%
WAVE Eco Wave Power Global AB (publ)	64.23%	-46.92%	787.10%	-58.34%	-30.95%	-60.27%

Correlation

The correlation between LSF and WAVE is 0.01, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.01
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.07
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 2, 2021	0.08

Fundamentals

Market Cap LSF : $37.03M WAVE : $56.00M
EPS LSF : -$1.00 WAVE : -$0.67
PS Ratio LSF : 1.08 WAVE : 1.47K
Total Revenue (TTM) LSF : $32.12M WAVE : $38.11K
Gross Profit (TTM) LSF : $18.64M WAVE : $22.06K
EBITDA (TTM) LSF : -$6.81M WAVE : -$2.97M

Return for Risk

LSF vs. WAVE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

LSF

LSF Risk / Return Rank: 16
LSF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 13
LSF Sortino Ratio Rank: 17
LSF Omega Ratio Rank: 17
LSF Calmar Ratio Rank: 15
LSF Martin Ratio Rank: 20

WAVE

WAVE Risk / Return Rank: 66
WAVE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 67
WAVE Sortino Ratio Rank: 71
WAVE Omega Ratio Rank: 66
WAVE Calmar Ratio Rank: 65
WAVE Martin Ratio Rank: 62

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

LSF vs. WAVE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Laird Superfood, Inc. (LSF) and Eco Wave Power Global AB (publ) (WAVE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	LSF	WAVE	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	-0.65	0.80	-1.45
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	-0.68	1.79	-2.47
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.91	1.20	-0.29
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.70	1.21	-1.91
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	-1.02	2.28	-3.30
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

LSF vs. WAVE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current LSF Sharpe Ratio is -0.65, which is lower than the WAVE Sharpe Ratio of 0.80. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LSF and WAVE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	LSF	WAVE	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.65	0.80	-1.45
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	-0.36	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	-0.36	-0.02	-0.34

Drawdowns

LSF vs. WAVE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LSF drawdown since its inception was -98.88%, roughly equal to the maximum WAVE drawdown of -94.47%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LSF and WAVE.

Drawdown Indicators

	LSF	WAVE	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-98.88%	-94.47%	-4.41%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-72.99%	-52.58%	-20.41%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-79.90%	-70.59%	-9.31%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-98.01%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-94.48%	-48.96%	-45.52%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-82.54%	-72.25%	-10.29%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	49.74%	27.90%	+21.84%

Volatility

LSF vs. WAVE - Volatility Comparison

Laird Superfood, Inc. (LSF) and Eco Wave Power Global AB (publ) (WAVE) have volatilities of 25.32% and 24.55%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	LSF	WAVE	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	25.32%	24.55%	+0.77%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	60.51%	52.71%	+7.80%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	79.03%	79.56%	-0.53%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	104.02%	143.28%	-39.26%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	101.21%	143.28%	-42.07%

Dividends

LSF vs. WAVE - Dividend Comparison

Neither LSF nor WAVE has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Financials

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both LSF and WAVE in my portfolio?

LSF and WAVE have a correlation of 0.01, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, LSF or WAVE?

LSF has higher volatility (25.32%) compared to WAVE (24.55%). In terms of maximum drawdown, LSF dropped -98.88% vs WAVE's -94.47%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

WAVE currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.80 vs -0.65), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.