LSF vs. LLY

The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with LSF having a -4.70% return and LLY slightly lower at -4.85%.

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Laird Superfood, Inc. (LSF) and Eli Lilly and Company (LLY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

The current LSF Sharpe Ratio is 1.89, which is higher than the LLY Sharpe Ratio of -0.12. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LSF and LLY, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

LSF has not paid dividends to shareholders, while LLY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.76%.

The maximum LSF drawdown since its inception was -98.88%, which is greater than LLY's maximum drawdown of -68.27%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LSF and LLY. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.

The current volatility for Laird Superfood, Inc. (LSF) is 12.33%, while Eli Lilly and Company (LLY) has a volatility of 22.02%. This indicates that LSF experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than LLY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Laird Superfood, Inc. and Eli Lilly and Company. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.