LSF vs. SOUN
LSF (Laird Superfood, Inc.) and SOUN (SoundHound AI, Inc.) are both stocks. LSF operates in Packaged Foods (Consumer Defensive), while SOUN operates in Software - Application (Technology). Over the past 3 years, LSF returned 53.51%/yr vs 36.88%/yr for SOUN. Their 0.15 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship.
Performance
LSF vs. SOUN - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, LSF achieves a 87.39% return, which is significantly higher than SOUN's -38.52% return.
LSF
- 1D
- -0.95%
- 1M
- -14.93%
- 6M
- 33.76%
- YTD
- 87.39%
- 1Y
- -40.57%
- 3Y*
- 53.51%
- 5Y*
- -31.66%
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- -30.01%
SOUN
- 1D
- -0.16%
- 1M
- -6.41%
- 6M
- -27.54%
- YTD
- -38.52%
- 1Y
- -39.37%
- 3Y*
- 36.88%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- -7.94%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $180.91K | $154.40K | $231.93K | |
| $243.59M | $220.65M | $222.18M |
LSF vs. SOUN - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LSF Laird Superfood, Inc. | 87.39% | -71.83% | 765.93% | 8.33% | -66.53% |
SOUN SoundHound AI, Inc. | -38.52% | -49.75% | 835.85% | 19.77% | -79.70% |
Correlation
The correlation between LSF and SOUN is 0.24, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.24 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.18 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 28, 2022 | 0.15 |
Fundamentals
LSF:
$45.78M
SOUN:
$2.67B
LSF:
-$0.99
SOUN:
-$0.43
LSF:
1.42
SOUN:
12.97
LSF:
$32.12M
SOUN:
$183.99M
LSF:
$18.64M
SOUN:
$69.84M
LSF:
-$6.81M
SOUN:
-$124.47M
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
LSF vs. SOUN — Risk / Return Rank
LSF
SOUN
LSF vs. SOUN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Laird Superfood, Inc. (LSF) and SoundHound AI, Inc. (SOUN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| LSF | SOUN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.04 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.18 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.97 | 0.95 | +0.01 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.56 | -0.56 | -0.01 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.79 | -0.79 | -0.01 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
LSF vs. SOUN - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum LSF drawdown since its inception was -98.88%, which is greater than SOUN's maximum drawdown of -93.55%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LSF and SOUN.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| LSF | SOUN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -98.88% | -93.55% | -5.33% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -71.71% | -73.36% | +1.65% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -79.90% | -76.48% | -3.42% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -97.41% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -92.81% | -74.70% | -18.11% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -82.75% | -67.12% | -15.63% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 50.63% | 51.67% | -1.04% |
Volatility
LSF vs. SOUN - Volatility Comparison
Laird Superfood, Inc. (LSF) has a higher volatility of 18.88% compared to SoundHound AI, Inc. (SOUN) at 17.54%. This indicates that LSF's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SOUN based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| LSF | SOUN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 18.88% | 17.54% | +1.34% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 52.12% | 52.63% | -0.51% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 83.40% | 78.77% | +4.63% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 104.65% | 134.53% | -29.88% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 101.00% | 134.53% | -33.53% |
Dividends
LSF vs. SOUN - Dividend Comparison
Neither LSF nor SOUN has paid dividends to shareholders.
Financials
LSF vs. SOUN - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Laird Superfood, Inc. and SoundHound AI, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
Frequently Asked Questions
LSF and SOUN have a correlation of 0.24, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
LSF has higher volatility (18.88%) compared to SOUN (17.54%). In terms of maximum drawdown, LSF dropped -98.88% vs SOUN's -93.55%.
LSF currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.48 vs -0.52), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for LSF and SOUN
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer