PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
LSF vs. IOO
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

LSF vs. IOO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Laird Superfood, Inc. (LSF) and iShares Global 100 ETF (IOO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

LSF vs. IOO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
LSF
Laird Superfood, Inc.
-3.15%-71.83%765.93%8.33%-93.56%-72.44%15.98%
IOO
iShares Global 100 ETF
-4.50%27.02%26.54%27.71%-16.34%26.03%16.18%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LSF achieves a -3.15% return, which is significantly higher than IOO's -4.50% return.


LSF

1D
0.94%
1M
-20.96%
YTD
-3.15%
6M
-61.47%
1Y
-65.04%
3Y*
38.44%
5Y*
-43.60%
10Y*

IOO

1D
3.46%
1M
-5.18%
YTD
-4.50%
6M
1.16%
1Y
26.95%
3Y*
21.47%
5Y*
14.29%
10Y*
15.03%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

LSF vs. IOO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

LSF
LSF Risk / Return Rank: 88
Overall Rank
LSF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 77
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LSF Sortino Ratio Rank: 77
Sortino Ratio Rank
LSF Omega Ratio Rank: 88
Omega Ratio Rank
LSF Calmar Ratio Rank: 88
Calmar Ratio Rank
LSF Martin Ratio Rank: 99
Martin Ratio Rank

IOO
IOO Risk / Return Rank: 8383
Overall Rank
IOO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7979
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IOO Sortino Ratio Rank: 8383
Sortino Ratio Rank
IOO Omega Ratio Rank: 8282
Omega Ratio Rank
IOO Calmar Ratio Rank: 8282
Calmar Ratio Rank
IOO Martin Ratio Rank: 8888
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

LSF vs. IOO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Laird Superfood, Inc. (LSF) and iShares Global 100 ETF (IOO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


LSFIOODifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

-0.87

1.41

-2.28

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

-1.31

2.09

-3.39

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

0.83

1.31

-0.48

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

-0.90

2.18

-3.08

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

-1.50

10.38

-11.88

LSF vs. IOO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current LSF Sharpe Ratio is -0.87, which is lower than the IOO Sharpe Ratio of 1.41. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LSF and IOO, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


LSFIOODifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.87

1.41

-2.28

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.42

0.85

-1.27

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.85

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.41

0.36

-0.77

Correlation

The correlation between LSF and IOO is 0.17, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


Dividends

LSF vs. IOO - Dividend Comparison

LSF has not paid dividends to shareholders, while IOO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.96%.


TTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
LSF
Laird Superfood, Inc.
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
IOO
iShares Global 100 ETF
0.96%0.92%1.08%1.49%2.00%1.53%1.49%2.02%2.54%2.23%2.75%2.89%

Drawdowns

LSF vs. IOO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LSF drawdown since its inception was -98.88%, which is greater than IOO's maximum drawdown of -55.85%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LSF and IOO.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


LSFIOODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-98.88%

-55.85%

-43.03%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-73.28%

-12.40%

-60.88%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-98.33%

-23.52%

-74.81%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-31.43%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-96.28%

-6.82%

-89.46%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-82.15%

-11.34%

-70.81%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

43.75%

2.61%

+41.14%

Volatility

LSF vs. IOO - Volatility Comparison

Laird Superfood, Inc. (LSF) has a higher volatility of 19.60% compared to iShares Global 100 ETF (IOO) at 6.26%. This indicates that LSF's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IOO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


LSFIOODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

19.60%

6.26%

+13.34%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

66.94%

10.69%

+56.25%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

75.10%

19.22%

+55.88%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

103.14%

16.97%

+86.17%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

101.69%

17.74%

+83.95%