LSF vs. IOO
LSF (Laird Superfood, Inc.) is a stock, while IOO (iShares Global 100 ETF) is Global Equities fund tracking the S&P Global 100 Index (Net). Over the past 5 years, LSF returned -37.13%/yr vs 16.68%/yr for IOO. At a 0.18 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
LSF vs. IOO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, LSF achieves a 43.69% return, which is significantly higher than IOO's 12.26% return.
LSF
- 1D
- -5.06%
- 1M
- 2.90%
- YTD
- 43.69%
- 6M
- 30.20%
- 1Y
- -50.92%
- 3Y*
- 64.24%
- 5Y*
- -37.13%
- 10Y*
- —
IOO
- 1D
- -1.33%
- 1M
- 5.37%
- YTD
- 12.26%
- 6M
- 12.43%
- 1Y
- 38.24%
- 3Y*
- 25.48%
- 5Y*
- 16.68%
- 10Y*
- 16.70%
LSF vs. IOO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LSF Laird Superfood, Inc. | 43.69% | -71.83% | 765.93% | 8.33% | -93.56% | -72.44% | 15.98% |
IOO iShares Global 100 ETF | 12.26% | 27.02% | 26.54% | 27.71% | -16.34% | 26.03% | 16.18% |
Correlation
The correlation between LSF and IOO is 0.27, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.27 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.15 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.17 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 24, 2020 | 0.18 |
The correlation between LSF and IOO shifts across timeframes, from 0.15 (3 years) to 0.27 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
LSF vs. IOO — Risk / Return Rank
LSF
IOO
LSF vs. IOO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Laird Superfood, Inc. (LSF) and iShares Global 100 ETF (IOO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| LSF | IOO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -3.49 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -4.52 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.91 | 1.50 | -0.59 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.70 | 3.87 | -4.57 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.02 | 17.94 | -18.97 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| LSF | IOO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.65 | 2.84 | -3.49 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.36 | 0.98 | -1.34 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.94 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.36 | 0.39 | -0.75 |
Drawdowns
LSF vs. IOO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum LSF drawdown since its inception was -98.88%, which is greater than IOO's maximum drawdown of -55.85%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LSF and IOO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| LSF | IOO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -98.88% | -55.85% | -43.03% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -72.99% | -9.94% | -63.05% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -79.90% | -19.19% | -60.71% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -98.01% | -23.52% | -74.49% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -31.43% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -94.48% | -1.33% | -93.15% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -82.54% | -11.27% | -71.27% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 49.74% | 2.14% | +47.60% |
Volatility
LSF vs. IOO - Volatility Comparison
Laird Superfood, Inc. (LSF) has a higher volatility of 25.32% compared to iShares Global 100 ETF (IOO) at 3.81%. This indicates that LSF's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IOO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| LSF | IOO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 25.32% | 3.81% | +21.51% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 60.51% | 10.59% | +49.92% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 79.03% | 13.54% | +65.49% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 104.02% | 17.04% | +86.98% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 101.21% | 17.78% | +83.43% |
Dividends
LSF vs. IOO - Dividend Comparison
LSF has not paid dividends to shareholders, while IOO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.82%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IOO iShares Global 100 ETF | 0.82% | 0.92% | 1.08% | 1.49% | 2.00% | 1.53% | 1.49% | 2.02% | 2.54% | 2.23% | 2.75% | 2.89% |
LSF Laird Superfood, Inc. | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
LSF and IOO have a correlation of 0.27, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
LSF has higher volatility (25.32%) compared to IOO (3.81%). In terms of maximum drawdown, LSF dropped -98.88% vs IOO's -55.85%.
IOO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.84 vs -0.65), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for LSF and IOO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer