LSF vs. ASM
LSF (Laird Superfood, Inc.) and ASM (Avino Silver & Gold Mines Ltd.) are both stocks. LSF operates in Packaged Foods (Consumer Defensive), while ASM operates in Other Precious Metals & Mining (Basic Materials). Over the past 5 years, LSF returned -30.85%/yr vs 38.35%/yr for ASM. At a 0.14 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
LSF vs. ASM - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, LSF achieves a 100.90% return, which is significantly higher than ASM's -5.31% return.
LSF
- 1D
- -2.62%
- 1M
- 24.93%
- YTD
- 100.90%
- 6M
- 106.48%
- 1Y
- -28.75%
- 3Y*
- 75.15%
- 5Y*
- -30.85%
- 10Y*
- —
ASM
- 1D
- -8.41%
- 1M
- -9.95%
- YTD
- -5.31%
- 6M
- -13.91%
- 1Y
- 69.94%
- 3Y*
- 107.69%
- 5Y*
- 38.35%
- 10Y*
- 9.99%
LSF vs. ASM - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LSF Laird Superfood, Inc. | 100.90% | -71.83% | 765.93% | 8.33% | -93.56% | -72.44% | 41.04% |
ASM Avino Silver & Gold Mines Ltd. | -5.31% | 604.88% | 68.13% | -22.95% | -21.01% | -33.77% | 23.81% |
Correlation
The correlation between LSF and ASM is 0.14, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.14 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.15 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.15 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 23, 2020 | 0.14 |
Fundamentals
LSF:
$51.77M
ASM:
$1.02B
LSF:
-$1.00
ASM:
$0.23
LSF:
1.50
ASM:
8.62
LSF:
$32.12M
ASM:
$110.70M
LSF:
$18.64M
ASM:
$59.09M
LSF:
-$6.81M
ASM:
$55.20M
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
LSF vs. ASM — Risk / Return Rank
LSF
ASM
LSF vs. ASM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Laird Superfood, Inc. (LSF) and Avino Silver & Gold Mines Ltd. (ASM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| LSF | ASM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.21 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.58 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.00 | 1.19 | -0.19 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.40 | 1.34 | -1.74 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.57 | 2.77 | -3.33 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
LSF vs. ASM - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum LSF drawdown since its inception was -98.88%, which is greater than ASM's maximum drawdown of -94.10%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LSF and ASM.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| LSF | ASM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -98.88% | -94.10% | -4.78% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -72.99% | -52.40% | -20.59% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -79.90% | -52.40% | -27.50% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -97.87% | -63.94% | -33.93% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -90.91% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -92.29% | -47.69% | -44.60% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -82.58% | -63.74% | -18.84% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 50.88% | 25.37% | +25.51% |
Volatility
LSF vs. ASM - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Laird Superfood, Inc. (LSF) is 22.51%, while Avino Silver & Gold Mines Ltd. (ASM) has a volatility of 27.33%. This indicates that LSF experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ASM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| LSF | ASM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 22.51% | 27.33% | -4.82% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 60.19% | 66.16% | -5.97% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 81.03% | 82.61% | -1.58% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 104.27% | 66.18% | +38.09% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 101.46% | 69.80% | +31.66% |
Dividends
LSF vs. ASM - Dividend Comparison
Neither LSF nor ASM has paid dividends to shareholders.
Financials
LSF vs. ASM - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Laird Superfood, Inc. and Avino Silver & Gold Mines Ltd.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
Frequently Asked Questions
LSF and ASM have a correlation of 0.14, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
ASM has higher volatility (27.33%) compared to LSF (22.51%). In terms of maximum drawdown, LSF dropped -98.88% vs ASM's -94.10%.
ASM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.85 vs -0.36), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for LSF and ASM
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer