PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
LSF vs. ASM
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Financials

Performance

LSF vs. ASM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Laird Superfood, Inc. (LSF) and Avino Silver & Gold Mines Ltd. (ASM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

LSF vs. ASM - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
LSF
Laird Superfood, Inc.
-3.15%-71.83%765.93%8.33%-93.56%-72.44%15.98%
ASM
Avino Silver & Gold Mines Ltd.
1.77%604.88%68.13%-22.95%-21.01%-33.77%39.32%

Fundamentals

Market Cap

LSF:

$22.69M

ASM:

$1.04B

EPS

LSF:

-$0.31

ASM:

$0.17

PS Ratio

LSF:

1.88

ASM:

11.37

PB Ratio

LSF:

1.98

ASM:

4.45

Total Revenue (TTM)

LSF:

$12.10M

ASM:

$88.12M

Gross Profit (TTM)

LSF:

$18.91M

ASM:

$44.14M

EBITDA (TTM)

LSF:

-$2.94M

ASM:

$39.90M

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LSF achieves a -3.15% return, which is significantly lower than ASM's 1.77% return.


LSF

1D
0.94%
1M
-20.96%
YTD
-3.15%
6M
-61.47%
1Y
-65.04%
3Y*
38.44%
5Y*
-43.60%
10Y*

ASM

1D
8.78%
1M
-34.30%
YTD
1.77%
6M
20.38%
1Y
243.48%
3Y*
92.57%
5Y*
37.41%
10Y*
20.13%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

LSF vs. ASM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

LSF
LSF Risk / Return Rank: 88
Overall Rank
LSF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 77
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LSF Sortino Ratio Rank: 77
Sortino Ratio Rank
LSF Omega Ratio Rank: 88
Omega Ratio Rank
LSF Calmar Ratio Rank: 88
Calmar Ratio Rank
LSF Martin Ratio Rank: 99
Martin Ratio Rank

ASM
ASM Risk / Return Rank: 9393
Overall Rank
ASM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9696
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ASM Sortino Ratio Rank: 9292
Sortino Ratio Rank
ASM Omega Ratio Rank: 8989
Omega Ratio Rank
ASM Calmar Ratio Rank: 9292
Calmar Ratio Rank
ASM Martin Ratio Rank: 9393
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

LSF vs. ASM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Laird Superfood, Inc. (LSF) and Avino Silver & Gold Mines Ltd. (ASM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


LSFASMDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

-0.87

2.93

-3.80

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

-1.31

3.03

-4.33

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

0.83

1.38

-0.55

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

-0.90

4.47

-5.37

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

-1.50

13.63

-15.13

LSF vs. ASM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current LSF Sharpe Ratio is -0.87, which is lower than the ASM Sharpe Ratio of 2.93. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LSF and ASM, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


LSFASMDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.87

2.93

-3.80

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.42

0.58

-1.00

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.29

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.41

0.09

-0.50

Correlation

The correlation between LSF and ASM is 0.13, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


Dividends

LSF vs. ASM - Dividend Comparison

Neither LSF nor ASM has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Drawdowns

LSF vs. ASM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LSF drawdown since its inception was -98.88%, which is greater than ASM's maximum drawdown of -94.10%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LSF and ASM.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


LSFASMDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-98.88%

-94.10%

-4.78%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-73.28%

-52.40%

-20.88%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-98.33%

-70.08%

-28.25%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-90.91%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-96.28%

-43.77%

-52.51%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-82.15%

-64.02%

-18.13%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

43.75%

17.20%

+26.55%

Volatility

LSF vs. ASM - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Laird Superfood, Inc. (LSF) is 19.60%, while Avino Silver & Gold Mines Ltd. (ASM) has a volatility of 28.16%. This indicates that LSF experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ASM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


LSFASMDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

19.60%

28.16%

-8.56%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

66.94%

67.30%

-0.36%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

75.10%

83.71%

-8.61%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

103.14%

65.03%

+38.11%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

101.69%

70.32%

+31.37%

Financials

LSF vs. ASM - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Laird Superfood, Inc. and Avino Silver & Gold Mines Ltd.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


-10.00M0.0010.00M20.00M30.00MAprilJulyOctober2022AprilJulyOctober2023AprilJulyOctober2024AprilJulyOctober2025AprilJulyOctober
-14.55M
26.44M
(LSF) Total Revenue
(ASM) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

LSF vs. ASM - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Laird Superfood, Inc. and Avino Silver & Gold Mines Ltd. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

-40.0%-20.0%0.0%20.0%40.0%60.0%AprilJulyOctober2022AprilJulyOctober2023AprilJulyOctober2024AprilJulyOctober2025AprilJulyOctober
-31.5%
50.9%
Portfolio components
LSF - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Laird Superfood, Inc. reported a gross profit of 4.58M and revenue of -14.55M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was -31.5%.

ASM - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Avino Silver & Gold Mines Ltd. reported a gross profit of 13.45M and revenue of 26.44M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 50.9%.

LSF - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Laird Superfood, Inc. reported an operating income of -6.91M and revenue of -14.55M, resulting in an operating margin of 47.5%.

ASM - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Avino Silver & Gold Mines Ltd. reported an operating income of 9.80M and revenue of 26.44M, resulting in an operating margin of 37.1%.

LSF - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Laird Superfood, Inc. reported a net income of -1.76M and revenue of -14.55M, resulting in a net margin of 12.1%.

ASM - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Avino Silver & Gold Mines Ltd. reported a net income of 10.62M and revenue of 26.44M, resulting in a net margin of 40.2%.