LSF vs. LUNR

Last updated Aug 1, 2026

LSF (Laird Superfood, Inc.) and LUNR (Intuitive Machines, Inc.) are both stocks. LSF operates in Packaged Foods (Consumer Defensive), while LUNR operates in Aerospace & Defense (Industrials). Over the past 3 years, LSF returned 53.51%/yr vs 15.02%/yr for LUNR. Their 0.07 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship.

Performance

LSF vs. LUNR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Laird Superfood, Inc. (LSF) and Intuitive Machines, Inc. (LUNR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LSF achieves a 87.39% return, which is significantly higher than LUNR's -23.97% return.

LSF

• 1D: -0.95%
• 1M: -14.93%
• 6M: 33.76%
• YTD: 87.39%
• 1Y: -40.57%
• 3Y*: 53.51%
• 5Y*: -31.66%
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: -30.01%

LUNR

• 1D: 0.73%
• 1M: -36.98%
• 6M: -35.02%
• YTD: -23.97%
• 1Y: 16.31%
• 3Y*: 15.02%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 5.37%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
LSF Laird Superfood, Inc.	$180.91K	$154.40K	$231.93K
LUNR Intuitive Machines, Inc.	$108.37M	$133.78M	$360.74M

LSF vs. LUNR - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
LSF Laird Superfood, Inc.	87.39%	-71.83%	765.93%	8.33%	-93.56%	-17.05%
LUNR Intuitive Machines, Inc.	-23.97%	-10.63%	610.76%	-74.45%	3.73%	-0.10%

Correlation

The correlation between LSF and LUNR is 0.11, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	0.11
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history.	0.11
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 17, 2021	0.07

Fundamentals

Market Cap LSF : $45.78M LUNR : $1.97B
EPS LSF : -$0.99 LUNR : -$0.00
PS Ratio LSF : 1.42 LUNR : 1.82K
Total Revenue (TTM) LSF : $32.12M LUNR : $334.27M
Gross Profit (TTM) LSF : $18.64M LUNR : $85.92M
EBITDA (TTM) LSF : -$6.81M LUNR : -$96.76M

Return for Risk

LSF vs. LUNR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

LSF

LSF Risk / Return Rank: 26
LSF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 23
LSF Sortino Ratio Rank: 27
LSF Omega Ratio Rank: 26
LSF Calmar Ratio Rank: 24
LSF Martin Ratio Rank: 28

LUNR

LUNR Risk / Return Rank: 52
LUNR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 49
LUNR Sortino Ratio Rank: 59
LUNR Omega Ratio Rank: 55
LUNR Calmar Ratio Rank: 49
LUNR Martin Ratio Rank: 50

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

LSF vs. LUNR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Laird Superfood, Inc. (LSF) and Intuitive Machines, Inc. (LUNR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	LSF	LUNR	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	-0.48	0.10	-0.58
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	-0.27	1.00	-1.27
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.97	1.11	-0.14
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.56	0.14	-0.70
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	-0.79	0.37	-1.16

LSF vs. LUNR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current LSF Sharpe Ratio is -0.48, which is lower than the LUNR Sharpe Ratio of 0.10. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LSF and LUNR, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

LSF vs. LUNR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LSF drawdown since its inception was -98.88%, roughly equal to the maximum LUNR drawdown of -97.43%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LSF and LUNR.

Drawdown Indicators

	LSF	LUNR	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-98.88%	-97.43%	-1.45%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-71.71%	-75.08%	+3.37%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-79.90%	-76.91%	-2.99%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-97.41%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-92.81%	-84.95%	-7.86%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-82.75%	-63.66%	-19.09%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	50.63%	28.88%	+21.75%

Volatility

LSF vs. LUNR - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Laird Superfood, Inc. (LSF) is 18.88%, while Intuitive Machines, Inc. (LUNR) has a volatility of 20.62%. This indicates that LSF experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than LUNR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	LSF	LUNR	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	18.88%	20.62%	-1.74%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	52.12%	84.90%	-32.78%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	83.40%	110.95%	-27.55%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	104.65%	169.44%	-64.79%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	101.00%	169.44%	-68.44%

Dividends

LSF vs. LUNR - Dividend Comparison

Neither LSF nor LUNR has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Financials

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both LSF and LUNR in my portfolio?

LSF and LUNR have a correlation of 0.11, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, LSF or LUNR?

LUNR has higher volatility (20.62%) compared to LSF (18.88%). In terms of maximum drawdown, LSF dropped -98.88% vs LUNR's -97.43%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

LUNR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.10 vs -0.48), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.