LSF vs. LUNR
LSF (Laird Superfood, Inc.) and LUNR (Intuitive Machines Inc. ) are both stocks. LSF operates in Packaged Foods (Consumer Defensive), while LUNR operates in Aerospace & Defense (Industrials). Over the past 3 years, LSF returned 75.15%/yr vs 35.29%/yr for LUNR. At a 0.08 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
LSF vs. LUNR - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, LSF achieves a 100.90% return, which is significantly higher than LUNR's 29.08% return.
LSF
- 1D
- -2.62%
- 1M
- 24.93%
- YTD
- 100.90%
- 6M
- 106.48%
- 1Y
- -28.75%
- 3Y*
- 75.15%
- 5Y*
- -30.85%
- 10Y*
- —
LUNR
- 1D
- -4.73%
- 1M
- -45.24%
- YTD
- 29.08%
- 6M
- 26.89%
- 1Y
- 109.50%
- 3Y*
- 35.29%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
LSF vs. LUNR - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LSF Laird Superfood, Inc. | 100.90% | -71.83% | 765.93% | 8.33% | -93.56% | -17.05% |
LUNR Intuitive Machines Inc. | 29.08% | -10.63% | 610.76% | -74.45% | 3.73% | -0.10% |
Correlation
The correlation between LSF and LUNR is 0.14, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.14 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.12 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 17, 2021 | 0.08 |
Fundamentals
LSF:
$51.77M
LUNR:
$3.10T
LSF:
-$1.00
LUNR:
-$0.00
LSF:
1.50
LUNR:
2.32K
LSF:
$32.12M
LUNR:
$334.27M
LSF:
$18.64M
LUNR:
$85.92M
LSF:
-$6.81M
LUNR:
-$96.76M
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
LSF vs. LUNR — Risk / Return Rank
LSF
LUNR
LSF vs. LUNR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Laird Superfood, Inc. (LSF) and Intuitive Machines Inc. (LUNR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| LSF | LUNR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.34 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.99 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.00 | 1.23 | -0.23 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.40 | 2.03 | -2.43 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.57 | 5.05 | -5.62 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
LSF vs. LUNR - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum LSF drawdown since its inception was -98.88%, roughly equal to the maximum LUNR drawdown of -97.43%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LSF and LUNR.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| LSF | LUNR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -98.88% | -97.43% | -1.45% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -72.99% | -54.16% | -18.83% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -79.90% | -78.09% | -1.81% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -97.87% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -92.29% | -74.45% | -17.84% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -82.58% | -63.26% | -19.32% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 50.88% | 21.75% | +29.13% |
Volatility
LSF vs. LUNR - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Laird Superfood, Inc. (LSF) is 22.51%, while Intuitive Machines Inc. (LUNR) has a volatility of 42.81%. This indicates that LSF experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than LUNR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| LSF | LUNR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 22.51% | 42.81% | -20.30% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 60.19% | 93.33% | -33.14% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 81.03% | 111.54% | -30.51% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 104.27% | 170.95% | -66.68% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 101.46% | 170.95% | -69.49% |
Dividends
LSF vs. LUNR - Dividend Comparison
Neither LSF nor LUNR has paid dividends to shareholders.
Financials
LSF vs. LUNR - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Laird Superfood, Inc. and Intuitive Machines Inc. . You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
Frequently Asked Questions
LSF and LUNR have a correlation of 0.14, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
LUNR has higher volatility (42.81%) compared to LSF (22.51%). In terms of maximum drawdown, LSF dropped -98.88% vs LUNR's -97.43%.
LUNR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.99 vs -0.36), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for LSF and LUNR
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer