PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
LUNR vs. QQQ
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

LUNR vs. QQQ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Intuitive Machines Inc. (LUNR) and Invesco QQQ ETF (QQQ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

LUNR vs. QQQ - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
LUNR
Intuitive Machines Inc.
14.36%-10.63%610.76%-74.45%3.73%-0.10%
QQQ
Invesco QQQ ETF
-5.93%20.77%25.58%54.86%-32.58%0.18%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LUNR achieves a 14.36% return, which is significantly higher than QQQ's -5.93% return.


LUNR

1D
13.52%
1M
12.62%
YTD
14.36%
6M
76.43%
1Y
149.13%
3Y*
19.78%
5Y*
10Y*

QQQ

1D
3.39%
1M
-4.84%
YTD
-5.93%
6M
-3.62%
1Y
23.68%
3Y*
22.32%
5Y*
12.88%
10Y*
18.85%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

LUNR vs. QQQ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

LUNR
LUNR Risk / Return Rank: 8484
Overall Rank
LUNR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8484
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LUNR Sortino Ratio Rank: 8585
Sortino Ratio Rank
LUNR Omega Ratio Rank: 8080
Omega Ratio Rank
LUNR Calmar Ratio Rank: 8787
Calmar Ratio Rank
LUNR Martin Ratio Rank: 8282
Martin Ratio Rank

QQQ
QQQ Risk / Return Rank: 6969
Overall Rank
QQQ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6363
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QQQ Sortino Ratio Rank: 6868
Sortino Ratio Rank
QQQ Omega Ratio Rank: 6767
Omega Ratio Rank
QQQ Calmar Ratio Rank: 7676
Calmar Ratio Rank
QQQ Martin Ratio Rank: 7373
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

LUNR vs. QQQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Intuitive Machines Inc. (LUNR) and Invesco QQQ ETF (QQQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


LUNRQQQDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.46

1.05

+0.41

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.36

1.63

+0.73

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.28

1.23

+0.04

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

3.10

1.88

+1.23

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

6.56

6.95

-0.39

LUNR vs. QQQ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current LUNR Sharpe Ratio is 1.46, which is higher than the QQQ Sharpe Ratio of 1.05. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LUNR and QQQ, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


LUNRQQQDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.46

1.05

+0.41

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.58

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.85

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.09

0.37

-0.28

Correlation

The correlation between LUNR and QQQ is 0.22, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


Dividends

LUNR vs. QQQ - Dividend Comparison

LUNR has not paid dividends to shareholders, while QQQ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.49%.


TTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
LUNR
Intuitive Machines Inc.
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
QQQ
Invesco QQQ ETF
0.49%0.45%0.56%0.62%0.80%0.43%0.55%0.74%0.91%0.84%1.06%0.99%

Drawdowns

LUNR vs. QQQ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LUNR drawdown since its inception was -97.43%, which is greater than QQQ's maximum drawdown of -82.97%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LUNR and QQQ.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


LUNRQQQDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-97.43%

-82.97%

-14.46%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-41.88%

-12.62%

-29.26%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-35.12%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-35.12%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-77.36%

-8.98%

-68.38%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-63.23%

-32.99%

-30.24%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

19.83%

3.41%

+16.42%

Volatility

LUNR vs. QQQ - Volatility Comparison

Intuitive Machines Inc. (LUNR) has a higher volatility of 33.24% compared to Invesco QQQ ETF (QQQ) at 6.51%. This indicates that LUNR's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than QQQ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


LUNRQQQDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

33.24%

6.51%

+26.73%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

83.21%

12.77%

+70.44%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

102.91%

22.67%

+80.24%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

172.98%

22.39%

+150.59%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

172.98%

22.25%

+150.73%