LSCC vs. RMBS
LSCC (Lattice Semiconductor Corporation) and RMBS (Rambus Inc.) are both stocks. Both operate in the Semiconductors industry within the Technology sector. Over the past 10 years, LSCC returned 35.40%/yr vs 21.34%/yr for RMBS. Their 0.48 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship.
Performance
LSCC vs. RMBS - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, LSCC achieves a 68.89% return, which is significantly higher than RMBS's -0.94% return. Over the past 10 years, LSCC has outperformed RMBS with an annualized return of 35.40%, while RMBS has yielded a comparatively lower 21.34% annualized return.
LSCC
- 1D
- -0.21%
- 1M
- -8.98%
- 6M
- 54.33%
- YTD
- 68.89%
- 1Y
- 153.66%
- 3Y*
- 10.15%
- 5Y*
- 16.97%
- 10Y*
- 35.40%
- ALL TIME*
- 12.26%
RMBS
- 1D
- 1.62%
- 1M
- -19.39%
- 6M
- -20.03%
- YTD
- -0.94%
- 1Y
- 25.71%
- 3Y*
- 18.38%
- 5Y*
- 30.93%
- 10Y*
- 21.34%
- ALL TIME*
- 9.76%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $223.85M | $231.43M | $290.28M | |
RMBS Rambus Inc. | $291.91M | $305.93M | $370.74M |
LSCC vs. RMBS - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LSCC Lattice Semiconductor Corporation | 68.89% | 29.89% | -17.89% | 6.33% | -15.81% | 68.18% | 139.39% | 176.59% | 19.72% | -21.47% |
RMBS Rambus Inc. | -0.94% | 73.84% | -22.55% | 90.54% | 21.88% | 68.33% | 26.75% | 79.60% | -46.06% | 3.27% |
Correlation
The correlation between LSCC and RMBS is 0.58, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.58 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.61 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.66 |
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions. | 0.58 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 14, 1997 | 0.48 |
The correlation between LSCC and RMBS shifts across timeframes, from 0.48 (all time) to 0.66 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
LSCC:
$17.03B
RMBS:
$9.87B
LSCC:
$0.14
RMBS:
$2.19
LSCC:
863.12
RMBS:
41.61
LSCC:
29.89
RMBS:
13.19
LSCC:
23.40
RMBS:
6.82
LSCC:
$574.01M
RMBS:
$756.33M
LSCC:
$383.93M
RMBS:
$591.98M
LSCC:
$65.23M
RMBS:
$331.39M
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
LSCC vs. RMBS — Risk / Return Rank
LSCC
RMBS
LSCC vs. RMBS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Lattice Semiconductor Corporation (LSCC) and Rambus Inc. (RMBS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| LSCC | RMBS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +2.23 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +2.07 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.38 | 1.12 | +0.26 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 5.52 | 0.45 | +5.06 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 18.29 | 1.19 | +17.09 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
LSCC vs. RMBS - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum LSCC drawdown since its inception was -97.34%, roughly equal to the maximum RMBS drawdown of -97.16%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LSCC and RMBS.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| LSCC | RMBS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -97.34% | -97.16% | -0.18% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -27.25% | -51.48% | +24.23% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -61.09% | -51.48% | -9.61% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -61.09% | -51.48% | -9.61% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -61.09% | -52.95% | -8.14% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -19.97% | -46.66% | +26.69% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -54.97% | -74.70% | +19.73% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 8.20% | 19.45% | -11.25% |
Volatility
LSCC vs. RMBS - Volatility Comparison
Lattice Semiconductor Corporation (LSCC) and Rambus Inc. (RMBS) have volatilities of 21.39% and 22.08%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| LSCC | RMBS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 21.39% | 22.08% | -0.69% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 48.69% | 64.38% | -15.69% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 59.98% | 80.06% | -20.08% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 55.34% | 56.88% | -1.54% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 51.11% | 47.18% | +3.93% |
Dividends
LSCC vs. RMBS - Dividend Comparison
Neither LSCC nor RMBS has paid dividends to shareholders.
Financials
LSCC vs. RMBS - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Lattice Semiconductor Corporation and Rambus Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
LSCC vs. RMBS - Profitability Comparison
LSCC - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Lattice Semiconductor Corporation reported a gross profit of 117.63M and revenue of 170.90M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 68.8%.
RMBS - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Rambus Inc. reported a gross profit of 165.41M and revenue of 207.39M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 79.8%.
LSCC - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Lattice Semiconductor Corporation reported an operating income of 26.07M and revenue of 170.90M, resulting in an operating margin of 15.3%.
RMBS - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Rambus Inc. reported an operating income of 72.73M and revenue of 207.39M, resulting in an operating margin of 35.1%.
LSCC - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Lattice Semiconductor Corporation reported a net income of 21.82M and revenue of 170.90M, resulting in a net margin of 12.8%.
RMBS - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Rambus Inc. reported a net income of 67.61M and revenue of 207.39M, resulting in a net margin of 32.6%.
Frequently Asked Questions
LSCC and RMBS have a correlation of 0.58, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
RMBS has higher volatility (22.08%) compared to LSCC (21.39%). In terms of maximum drawdown, LSCC dropped -97.34% vs RMBS's -97.16%.
LSCC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.52 vs 0.29), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for LSCC and RMBS
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer