LSCC vs. RMBS

Last updated Apr 1, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Lattice Semiconductor Corporation (LSCC) and Rambus Inc. (RMBS).

Performance

LSCC vs. RMBS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Lattice Semiconductor Corporation (LSCC) and Rambus Inc. (RMBS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

LSCC vs. RMBS - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
LSCC Lattice Semiconductor Corporation	26.07%	29.89%	-17.89%	6.33%	-15.81%	68.18%	139.39%	176.59%	19.72%	-21.47%
RMBS Rambus Inc.	-6.38%	73.84%	-22.55%	90.54%	21.88%	68.33%	26.75%	79.60%	-46.06%	3.27%

Fundamentals

Market Cap LSCC : $12.68B RMBS : $9.44B
EPS LSCC : $0.02 RMBS : $2.11
PE Ratio LSCC : 4.13K RMBS : 40.73
PS Ratio LSCC : 24.37 RMBS : 13.26
PB Ratio LSCC : 18.29 RMBS : 6.92
Total Revenue (TTM) LSCC : $523.26M RMBS : $707.63M
Gross Profit (TTM) LSCC : $356.94M RMBS : $537.56M
EBITDA (TTM) LSCC : $45.55M RMBS : $307.44M

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LSCC achieves a 26.07% return, which is significantly higher than RMBS's -6.38% return. Over the past 10 years, LSCC has outperformed RMBS with an annualized return of 32.43%, while RMBS has yielded a comparatively lower 20.04% annualized return.

LSCC

• 1D: 8.72%
• 1M: -2.99%
• YTD: 26.07%
• 6M: 26.51%
• 1Y: 76.85%
• 3Y*: -0.97%
• 5Y*: 13.76%
• 10Y*: 32.43%

RMBS

• 1D: 7.90%
• 1M: -13.68%
• YTD: -6.38%
• 6M: -17.44%
• 1Y: 66.16%
• 3Y*: 18.84%
• 5Y*: 33.46%
• 10Y*: 20.04%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Return for Risk

LSCC vs. RMBS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

LSCC

LSCC Risk / Return Rank: 80
LSCC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 80
LSCC Sortino Ratio Rank: 78
LSCC Omega Ratio Rank: 78
LSCC Calmar Ratio Rank: 81
LSCC Martin Ratio Rank: 84

RMBS

RMBS Risk / Return Rank: 73
RMBS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 74
RMBS Sortino Ratio Rank: 72
RMBS Omega Ratio Rank: 71
RMBS Calmar Ratio Rank: 73
RMBS Martin Ratio Rank: 76

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

LSCC vs. RMBS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Lattice Semiconductor Corporation (LSCC) and Rambus Inc. (RMBS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	LSCC	RMBS	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	1.24	0.95	+0.29
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	1.97	1.64	+0.33
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.27	1.21	+0.05
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.38	1.64	+0.74
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	7.14	4.63	+2.51
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

LSCC vs. RMBS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current LSCC Sharpe Ratio is 1.24, which is higher than the RMBS Sharpe Ratio of 0.95. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LSCC and RMBS, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	LSCC	RMBS	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.24	0.95	+0.29
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.26	0.65	-0.39
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.64	0.45	+0.19
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.20	0.13	+0.07

Correlation

The correlation between LSCC and RMBS is 0.47, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.

Dividends

LSCC vs. RMBS - Dividend Comparison

Neither LSCC nor RMBS has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Drawdowns

LSCC vs. RMBS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LSCC drawdown since its inception was -97.34%, roughly equal to the maximum RMBS drawdown of -97.16%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LSCC and RMBS.

Drawdown Indicators

	LSCC	RMBS	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-97.34%	-97.16%	-0.18%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-28.50%	-36.69%	+8.19%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-61.09%	-48.83%	-12.26%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-61.09%	-52.95%	-8.14%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-12.30%	-31.68%	+19.38%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-55.42%	-75.32%	+19.90%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	9.49%	13.00%	-3.51%

Volatility

LSCC vs. RMBS - Volatility Comparison

Lattice Semiconductor Corporation (LSCC) and Rambus Inc. (RMBS) have volatilities of 22.11% and 22.36%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	LSCC	RMBS	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	22.11%	22.36%	-0.25%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	40.40%	51.29%	-10.89%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	62.74%	70.09%	-7.35%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	53.93%	51.88%	+2.05%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	50.61%	44.28%	+6.33%

Financials

LSCC vs. RMBS - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Lattice Semiconductor Corporation and Rambus Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

LSCC - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Lattice Semiconductor Corporation reported a gross profit of 99.94M and revenue of 145.79M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 68.6%.

RMBS - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Rambus Inc. reported a gross profit of 150.03M and revenue of 190.24M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 78.9%.

LSCC - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Lattice Semiconductor Corporation reported an operating income of 1.09M and revenue of 145.79M, resulting in an operating margin of 0.7%.

RMBS - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Rambus Inc. reported an operating income of 70.83M and revenue of 190.24M, resulting in an operating margin of 37.2%.

LSCC - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Lattice Semiconductor Corporation reported a net income of -7.65M and revenue of 145.79M, resulting in a net margin of -5.2%.

RMBS - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Rambus Inc. reported a net income of 63.84M and revenue of 190.24M, resulting in a net margin of 33.6%.