PortfoliosLab logo
RMBS vs. MSFT
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Financials

Correlation

The correlation between RMBS and MSFT is 0.69, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


Performance

RMBS vs. MSFT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Rambus Inc. (RMBS) and Microsoft Corporation (MSFT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading data...

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

RMBS:

-0.04

MSFT:

0.34

Sortino Ratio

RMBS:

0.39

MSFT:

0.75

Omega Ratio

RMBS:

1.05

MSFT:

1.10

Calmar Ratio

RMBS:

-0.04

MSFT:

0.43

Martin Ratio

RMBS:

-0.13

MSFT:

0.94

Ulcer Index

RMBS:

23.58%

MSFT:

10.69%

Daily Std Dev

RMBS:

62.54%

MSFT:

25.67%

Max Drawdown

RMBS:

-97.16%

MSFT:

-69.39%

Current Drawdown

RMBS:

-51.99%

MSFT:

-2.10%

Fundamentals

Market Cap

RMBS:

$6.05B

MSFT:

$3.38T

EPS

RMBS:

$1.91

MSFT:

$12.99

PE Ratio

RMBS:

29.50

MSFT:

34.97

PEG Ratio

RMBS:

3.80

MSFT:

2.13

PS Ratio

RMBS:

10.00

MSFT:

12.50

PB Ratio

RMBS:

5.26

MSFT:

10.46

Total Revenue (TTM)

RMBS:

$605.42M

MSFT:

$270.01B

Gross Profit (TTM)

RMBS:

$478.42M

MSFT:

$186.51B

EBITDA (TTM)

RMBS:

$271.76M

MSFT:

$150.06B

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, RMBS achieves a 6.60% return, which is significantly lower than MSFT's 8.19% return. Over the past 10 years, RMBS has underperformed MSFT with an annualized return of 14.82%, while MSFT has yielded a comparatively higher 27.20% annualized return.


RMBS

YTD

6.60%

1M

23.25%

6M

9.82%

1Y

-2.79%

5Y*

29.61%

10Y*

14.82%

MSFT

YTD

8.19%

1M

23.74%

6M

10.10%

1Y

8.93%

5Y*

20.86%

10Y*

27.20%

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Risk-Adjusted Performance

RMBS vs. MSFT — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

RMBS
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of RMBS is 4848
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of RMBS is 4949
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of RMBS is 4747
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of RMBS is 4747
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of RMBS is 4848
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of RMBS is 4848
Martin Ratio Rank

MSFT
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of MSFT is 6363
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of MSFT is 6565
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of MSFT is 5858
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of MSFT is 5858
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of MSFT is 6969
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of MSFT is 6363
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

RMBS vs. MSFT - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Rambus Inc. (RMBS) and Microsoft Corporation (MSFT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


The current RMBS Sharpe Ratio is -0.04, which is lower than the MSFT Sharpe Ratio of 0.34. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of RMBS and MSFT, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading data...

Dividends

RMBS vs. MSFT - Dividend Comparison

RMBS has not paid dividends to shareholders, while MSFT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.71%.


TTM20242023202220212020201920182017201620152014
RMBS
Rambus Inc.
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
MSFT
Microsoft Corporation
0.71%0.73%0.74%1.06%0.68%0.94%1.20%1.69%1.86%2.37%2.33%2.48%

Drawdowns

RMBS vs. MSFT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RMBS drawdown since its inception was -97.16%, which is greater than MSFT's maximum drawdown of -69.39%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RMBS and MSFT. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


Loading data...

Volatility

RMBS vs. MSFT - Volatility Comparison

Rambus Inc. (RMBS) has a higher volatility of 14.60% compared to Microsoft Corporation (MSFT) at 8.98%. This indicates that RMBS's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MSFT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading data...

Financials

RMBS vs. MSFT - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Rambus Inc. and Microsoft Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.0020.00B40.00B60.00B80.00B20212022202320242025
166.66M
70.07B
(RMBS) Total Revenue
(MSFT) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

RMBS vs. MSFT - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Rambus Inc. and Microsoft Corporation over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

70.0%75.0%80.0%20212022202320242025
80.3%
68.7%
(RMBS) Gross Margin
(MSFT) Gross Margin
RMBS - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Rambus Inc. reported a gross profit of 133.82M and revenue of 166.66M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 80.3%.

MSFT - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Microsoft Corporation reported a gross profit of 48.15B and revenue of 70.07B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 68.7%.

RMBS - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Rambus Inc. reported an operating income of 63.14M and revenue of 166.66M, resulting in an operating margin of 37.9%.

MSFT - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Microsoft Corporation reported an operating income of 32.00B and revenue of 70.07B, resulting in an operating margin of 45.7%.

RMBS - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Rambus Inc. reported a net income of 60.30M and revenue of 166.66M, resulting in a net margin of 36.2%.

MSFT - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Microsoft Corporation reported a net income of 25.82B and revenue of 70.07B, resulting in a net margin of 36.9%.