PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Risk Analysis
Optimization
Factor Model
See All Tools
Portfolio Analysis
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Discussions
RMBS vs. MSFT
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Financials

Key characteristics


RMBSMSFT
YTD Return-17.83%8.34%
1Y Return20.01%34.24%
3Y Return (Ann)43.14%19.01%
5Y Return (Ann)36.85%27.10%
10Y Return (Ann)16.73%28.57%
Sharpe Ratio0.351.64
Daily Std Dev53.38%21.12%
Max Drawdown-97.16%-69.41%
Current Drawdown-52.22%-5.29%

Fundamentals


RMBSMSFT
Market Cap$6.43B$3.02T
EPS$3.01$11.54
PE Ratio19.6835.21
PEG Ratio3.802.02
Revenue (TTM)$461.12M$236.58B
Gross Profit (TTM)$361.15M$135.62B
EBITDA (TTM)$139.93M$126.13B

Correlation

-0.50.00.51.00.4

The correlation between RMBS and MSFT is 0.38, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.

Performance

RMBS vs. MSFT - Performance Comparison

In the year-to-date period, RMBS achieves a -17.83% return, which is significantly lower than MSFT's 8.34% return. Over the past 10 years, RMBS has underperformed MSFT with an annualized return of 16.73%, while MSFT has yielded a comparatively higher 28.57% annualized return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.


1,000.00%2,000.00%3,000.00%4,000.00%5,000.00%December2024FebruaryMarchAprilMay
641.55%
4,433.25%
RMBS
MSFT

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Rambus Inc.

Microsoft Corporation

Risk-Adjusted Performance

RMBS vs. MSFT - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Rambus Inc. (RMBS) and Microsoft Corporation (MSFT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


RMBS
Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for RMBS, currently valued at 0.35, compared to the broader market-2.00-1.000.001.002.003.004.000.35
Sortino ratio
The chart of Sortino ratio for RMBS, currently valued at 0.85, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.006.000.85
Omega ratio
The chart of Omega ratio for RMBS, currently valued at 1.11, compared to the broader market0.501.001.501.11
Calmar ratio
The chart of Calmar ratio for RMBS, currently valued at 0.31, compared to the broader market0.002.004.006.000.31
Martin ratio
The chart of Martin ratio for RMBS, currently valued at 1.33, compared to the broader market-10.000.0010.0020.0030.001.33
MSFT
Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for MSFT, currently valued at 1.64, compared to the broader market-2.00-1.000.001.002.003.004.001.64
Sortino ratio
The chart of Sortino ratio for MSFT, currently valued at 2.25, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.006.002.25
Omega ratio
The chart of Omega ratio for MSFT, currently valued at 1.28, compared to the broader market0.501.001.501.28
Calmar ratio
The chart of Calmar ratio for MSFT, currently valued at 2.67, compared to the broader market0.002.004.006.002.67
Martin ratio
The chart of Martin ratio for MSFT, currently valued at 6.55, compared to the broader market-10.000.0010.0020.0030.006.55

RMBS vs. MSFT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current RMBS Sharpe Ratio is 0.35, which is lower than the MSFT Sharpe Ratio of 1.64. The chart below compares the 12-month rolling Sharpe Ratio of RMBS and MSFT.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio0.501.001.502.002.503.00December2024FebruaryMarchAprilMay
0.35
1.64
RMBS
MSFT

Dividends

RMBS vs. MSFT - Dividend Comparison

RMBS has not paid dividends to shareholders, while MSFT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.70%.


TTM20232022202120202019201820172016201520142013
RMBS
Rambus Inc.
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
MSFT
Microsoft Corporation
0.70%0.74%1.06%0.68%0.94%1.20%1.69%1.86%2.37%2.33%2.48%2.59%

Drawdowns

RMBS vs. MSFT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RMBS drawdown since its inception was -97.16%, which is greater than MSFT's maximum drawdown of -69.41%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RMBS and MSFT. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-60.00%-50.00%-40.00%-30.00%-20.00%-10.00%0.00%December2024FebruaryMarchAprilMay
-52.22%
-5.29%
RMBS
MSFT

Volatility

RMBS vs. MSFT - Volatility Comparison

Rambus Inc. (RMBS) has a higher volatility of 15.32% compared to Microsoft Corporation (MSFT) at 7.09%. This indicates that RMBS's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MSFT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


5.00%10.00%15.00%20.00%25.00%December2024FebruaryMarchAprilMay
15.32%
7.09%
RMBS
MSFT

Financials

RMBS vs. MSFT - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Rambus Inc. and Microsoft Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities



Values in USD except per share items