RMBS vs. MSFT
Compare and contrast key facts about Rambus Inc. (RMBS) and Microsoft Corporation (MSFT).
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: RMBS or MSFT.
Correlation
The correlation between RMBS and MSFT is 0.38, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Performance
RMBS vs. MSFT - Performance Comparison
Key characteristics
RMBS:
-0.35
MSFT:
0.92
RMBS:
-0.13
MSFT:
1.27
RMBS:
0.98
MSFT:
1.17
RMBS:
-0.30
MSFT:
1.18
RMBS:
-0.72
MSFT:
2.71
RMBS:
27.86%
MSFT:
6.72%
RMBS:
57.75%
MSFT:
19.82%
RMBS:
-97.16%
MSFT:
-69.39%
RMBS:
-53.29%
MSFT:
-6.10%
Fundamentals
RMBS:
$6.20B
MSFT:
$3.38T
RMBS:
$1.61
MSFT:
$12.10
RMBS:
36.14
MSFT:
37.56
RMBS:
3.80
MSFT:
2.41
RMBS:
$517.75M
MSFT:
$254.19B
RMBS:
$402.47M
MSFT:
$176.28B
RMBS:
$240.38M
MSFT:
$139.14B
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, RMBS achieves a -19.66% return, which is significantly lower than MSFT's 17.18% return. Over the past 10 years, RMBS has underperformed MSFT with an annualized return of 16.99%, while MSFT has yielded a comparatively higher 26.79% annualized return.
RMBS
-19.66%
4.26%
-3.33%
-18.43%
32.12%
16.99%
MSFT
17.18%
5.41%
-1.63%
18.06%
23.86%
26.79%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
RMBS vs. MSFT - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Rambus Inc. (RMBS) and Microsoft Corporation (MSFT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
RMBS vs. MSFT - Dividend Comparison
RMBS has not paid dividends to shareholders, while MSFT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.70%.
| TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RMBS Rambus Inc. | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
MSFT Microsoft Corporation | 0.70% | 0.74% | 1.06% | 0.68% | 0.94% | 1.20% | 1.69% | 1.86% | 2.37% | 2.33% | 2.48% | 2.59% |
Drawdowns
RMBS vs. MSFT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum RMBS drawdown since its inception was -97.16%, which is greater than MSFT's maximum drawdown of -69.39%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RMBS and MSFT. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
RMBS vs. MSFT - Volatility Comparison
Rambus Inc. (RMBS) has a higher volatility of 9.96% compared to Microsoft Corporation (MSFT) at 5.78%. This indicates that RMBS's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MSFT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Financials
RMBS vs. MSFT - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Rambus Inc. and Microsoft Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities