PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Risk Analysis
Optimization
Factor Model
See All Tools
Portfolio Analysis
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Discussions
RMBS vs. AMBA
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Financials

Key characteristics


RMBSAMBA
YTD Return-20.51%-23.49%
1Y Return15.06%-26.60%
3Y Return (Ann)42.51%-20.80%
5Y Return (Ann)35.97%-1.72%
10Y Return (Ann)16.16%7.02%
Sharpe Ratio0.22-0.57
Daily Std Dev53.36%45.64%
Max Drawdown-97.16%-81.10%
Current Drawdown-53.78%-78.38%

Fundamentals


RMBSAMBA
Market Cap$6.43B$1.77B
EPS$3.01-$4.25
PE Ratio19.683.75
PEG Ratio3.804.97
Revenue (TTM)$461.12M$226.47M
Gross Profit (TTM)$361.15M$211.96M
EBITDA (TTM)$139.93M-$141.25M

Correlation

-0.50.00.51.00.5

The correlation between RMBS and AMBA is 0.46, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.

Performance

RMBS vs. AMBA - Performance Comparison

In the year-to-date period, RMBS achieves a -20.51% return, which is significantly higher than AMBA's -23.49% return. Over the past 10 years, RMBS has outperformed AMBA with an annualized return of 16.16%, while AMBA has yielded a comparatively lower 7.02% annualized return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.


600.00%800.00%1,000.00%1,200.00%1,400.00%December2024FebruaryMarchAprilMay
947.30%
673.76%
RMBS
AMBA

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Rambus Inc.

Ambarella, Inc.

Risk-Adjusted Performance

RMBS vs. AMBA - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Rambus Inc. (RMBS) and Ambarella, Inc. (AMBA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


RMBS
Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for RMBS, currently valued at 0.22, compared to the broader market-2.00-1.000.001.002.003.004.000.22
Sortino ratio
The chart of Sortino ratio for RMBS, currently valued at 0.68, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.006.000.68
Omega ratio
The chart of Omega ratio for RMBS, currently valued at 1.09, compared to the broader market0.501.001.501.09
Calmar ratio
The chart of Calmar ratio for RMBS, currently valued at 0.41, compared to the broader market0.002.004.006.000.41
Martin ratio
The chart of Martin ratio for RMBS, currently valued at 0.83, compared to the broader market-10.000.0010.0020.0030.000.83
AMBA
Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for AMBA, currently valued at -0.57, compared to the broader market-2.00-1.000.001.002.003.004.00-0.57
Sortino ratio
The chart of Sortino ratio for AMBA, currently valued at -0.54, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.006.00-0.54
Omega ratio
The chart of Omega ratio for AMBA, currently valued at 0.93, compared to the broader market0.501.001.500.93
Calmar ratio
The chart of Calmar ratio for AMBA, currently valued at -0.32, compared to the broader market0.002.004.006.00-0.32
Martin ratio
The chart of Martin ratio for AMBA, currently valued at -0.78, compared to the broader market-10.000.0010.0020.0030.00-0.78

RMBS vs. AMBA - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current RMBS Sharpe Ratio is 0.22, which is higher than the AMBA Sharpe Ratio of -0.57. The chart below compares the 12-month rolling Sharpe Ratio of RMBS and AMBA.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio-1.00-0.500.000.501.001.502.00December2024FebruaryMarchAprilMay
0.22
-0.57
RMBS
AMBA

Dividends

RMBS vs. AMBA - Dividend Comparison

Neither RMBS nor AMBA has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Drawdowns

RMBS vs. AMBA - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RMBS drawdown since its inception was -97.16%, which is greater than AMBA's maximum drawdown of -81.10%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RMBS and AMBA. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-80.00%-60.00%-40.00%-20.00%0.00%December2024FebruaryMarchAprilMay
-26.68%
-78.38%
RMBS
AMBA

Volatility

RMBS vs. AMBA - Volatility Comparison

Rambus Inc. (RMBS) has a higher volatility of 14.98% compared to Ambarella, Inc. (AMBA) at 12.12%. This indicates that RMBS's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than AMBA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


10.00%15.00%20.00%25.00%December2024FebruaryMarchAprilMay
14.98%
12.12%
RMBS
AMBA

Financials

RMBS vs. AMBA - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Rambus Inc. and Ambarella, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities



Values in USD except per share items