PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
RMBS vs. ALGM
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

RMBS vs. ALGM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Rambus Inc. (RMBS) and Allegro MicroSystems, Inc. (ALGM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, RMBS achieves a 52.74% return, which is significantly lower than ALGM's 133.43% return.


RMBS

1D
-0.58%
1M
-1.84%
YTD
52.74%
6M
47.33%
1Y
136.36%
3Y*
33.29%
5Y*
43.48%
10Y*
28.13%

ALGM

1D
4.37%
1M
34.02%
YTD
133.43%
6M
130.21%
1Y
98.90%
3Y*
14.29%
5Y*
18.27%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

RMBS vs. ALGM - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
RMBS
Rambus Inc.
52.74%73.84%-22.55%90.54%21.88%68.33%26.80%
ALGM
Allegro MicroSystems, Inc.
133.43%20.68%-27.78%0.83%-17.03%35.71%37.42%

Correlation

The correlation between RMBS and ALGM is 0.52, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.52

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.59

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.63

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 29, 2020

0.61

The correlation between RMBS and ALGM shifts across timeframes, from 0.52 (1 year) to 0.63 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

RMBS:

$15.40B

ALGM:

$11.41B

EPS

RMBS:

$2.11

ALGM:

-$0.08

PS Ratio

RMBS:

21.26

ALGM:

12.84

PB Ratio

RMBS:

11.05

ALGM:

11.93

Total Revenue (TTM)

RMBS:

$721.16M

ALGM:

$890.10M

Gross Profit (TTM)

RMBS:

$555.52M

ALGM:

$411.97M

EBITDA (TTM)

RMBS:

$298.07M

ALGM:

$60.02M

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

RMBS vs. ALGM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

RMBS
RMBS Risk / Return Rank: 8484
Overall Rank
RMBS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8686
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RMBS Sortino Ratio Rank: 8080
Sortino Ratio Rank
RMBS Omega Ratio Rank: 8282
Omega Ratio Rank
RMBS Calmar Ratio Rank: 8787
Calmar Ratio Rank
RMBS Martin Ratio Rank: 8787
Martin Ratio Rank

ALGM
ALGM Risk / Return Rank: 8181
Overall Rank
ALGM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8686
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ALGM Sortino Ratio Rank: 8383
Sortino Ratio Rank
ALGM Omega Ratio Rank: 8080
Omega Ratio Rank
ALGM Calmar Ratio Rank: 8080
Calmar Ratio Rank
ALGM Martin Ratio Rank: 7777
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

RMBS vs. ALGM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Rambus Inc. (RMBS) and Allegro MicroSystems, Inc. (ALGM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


RMBSALGMDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.03

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.19

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.31

1.29

+0.01

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.74

2.54

+1.20

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

9.20

5.31

+3.90

RMBS vs. ALGM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current RMBS Sharpe Ratio is 1.79, which is comparable to the ALGM Sharpe Ratio of 1.76. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of RMBS and ALGM, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

RMBS vs. ALGM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RMBS drawdown since its inception was -97.16%, which is greater than ALGM's maximum drawdown of -68.65%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RMBS and ALGM.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


RMBSALGMDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-97.16%

-68.65%

-28.51%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-36.69%

-39.22%

+2.53%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-48.83%

-68.65%

+19.82%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-48.83%

-68.65%

+19.82%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-52.95%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-17.76%

0.00%

-17.76%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-74.84%

-31.77%

-43.07%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

14.87%

18.71%

-3.84%

Volatility

RMBS vs. ALGM - Volatility Comparison

Rambus Inc. (RMBS) and Allegro MicroSystems, Inc. (ALGM) have volatilities of 28.67% and 27.59%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


RMBSALGMDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

28.67%

27.59%

+1.08%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

61.93%

47.63%

+14.30%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

76.80%

56.58%

+20.22%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

55.57%

50.97%

+4.60%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

46.46%

52.27%

-5.81%

Dividends

RMBS vs. ALGM - Dividend Comparison

Neither RMBS nor ALGM has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Financials

RMBS vs. ALGM - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Rambus Inc. and Allegro MicroSystems, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


100.00M150.00M200.00M250.00M20222023202420252026
180.19M
243.19M
(RMBS) Total Revenue
(ALGM) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

RMBS vs. ALGM - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Rambus Inc. and Allegro MicroSystems, Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

40.0%50.0%60.0%70.0%80.0%20222023202420252026
79.7%
47.0%
Portfolio components
RMBS - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Rambus Inc. reported a gross profit of 143.66M and revenue of 180.19M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 79.7%.

ALGM - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Allegro MicroSystems, Inc. reported a gross profit of 114.28M and revenue of 243.19M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 47.0%.

RMBS - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Rambus Inc. reported an operating income of 61.76M and revenue of 180.19M, resulting in an operating margin of 34.3%.

ALGM - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Allegro MicroSystems, Inc. reported an operating income of 5.41M and revenue of 243.19M, resulting in an operating margin of 2.2%.

RMBS - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Rambus Inc. reported a net income of 59.86M and revenue of 180.19M, resulting in a net margin of 33.2%.

ALGM - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Allegro MicroSystems, Inc. reported a net income of -16.49M and revenue of 243.19M, resulting in a net margin of -6.8%.


Frequently Asked Questions


RMBS and ALGM have a correlation of 0.52, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

RMBS has higher volatility (28.67%) compared to ALGM (27.59%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RMBS dropped -97.16% vs ALGM's -68.65%.

RMBS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.79 vs 1.76), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for RMBS and ALGM

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer