PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
LSCC vs. CRUS
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

LSCC vs. CRUS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Lattice Semiconductor Corporation (LSCC) and Cirrus Logic, Inc. (CRUS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LSCC achieves a 86.79% return, which is significantly higher than CRUS's 26.89% return. Over the past 10 years, LSCC has outperformed CRUS with an annualized return of 37.05%, while CRUS has yielded a comparatively lower 14.35% annualized return.


LSCC

1D
-1.50%
1M
-4.91%
6M
62.08%
YTD
86.79%
1Y
155.85%
3Y*
13.66%
5Y*
20.55%
10Y*
37.05%

CRUS

1D
0.29%
1M
-8.37%
6M
23.49%
YTD
26.89%
1Y
43.98%
3Y*
22.85%
5Y*
11.88%
10Y*
14.35%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

LSCC vs. CRUS - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
LSCC
Lattice Semiconductor Corporation
86.79%29.89%-17.89%6.33%-15.81%68.18%139.39%176.59%19.72%-21.47%
CRUS
Cirrus Logic, Inc.
26.89%19.00%19.70%11.69%-19.06%11.95%-0.25%148.37%-36.02%-8.28%

Correlation

The correlation between LSCC and CRUS is 0.50, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.50

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.57

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.62

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.54

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 26, 1990

0.44

The correlation between LSCC and CRUS shifts across timeframes, from 0.44 (all time) to 0.62 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

LSCC:

$18.83B

CRUS:

$7.59B

EPS

LSCC:

$0.14

CRUS:

$7.86

PE Ratio

LSCC:

954.59

CRUS:

19.12

PS Ratio

LSCC:

33.06

CRUS:

3.97

PB Ratio

LSCC:

25.88

CRUS:

3.70

Total Revenue (TTM)

LSCC:

$574.01M

CRUS:

$2.00B

Gross Profit (TTM)

LSCC:

$383.93M

CRUS:

$1.05B

EBITDA (TTM)

LSCC:

$65.23M

CRUS:

$503.58M

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

LSCC vs. CRUS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

LSCC
LSCC Risk / Return Rank: 9595
Overall Rank
LSCC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9595
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LSCC Sortino Ratio Rank: 9393
Sortino Ratio Rank
LSCC Omega Ratio Rank: 9292
Omega Ratio Rank
LSCC Calmar Ratio Rank: 9797
Calmar Ratio Rank
LSCC Martin Ratio Rank: 9797
Martin Ratio Rank

CRUS
CRUS Risk / Return Rank: 7878
Overall Rank
CRUS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7979
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CRUS Sortino Ratio Rank: 7474
Sortino Ratio Rank
CRUS Omega Ratio Rank: 7474
Omega Ratio Rank
CRUS Calmar Ratio Rank: 8181
Calmar Ratio Rank
CRUS Martin Ratio Rank: 8282
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

LSCC vs. CRUS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Lattice Semiconductor Corporation (LSCC) and Cirrus Logic, Inc. (CRUS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


LSCCCRUSDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.48

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.48

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.40

1.22

+0.18

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

7.82

2.28

+5.54

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

21.65

5.85

+15.80

LSCC vs. CRUS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current LSCC Sharpe Ratio is 2.64, which is higher than the CRUS Sharpe Ratio of 1.16. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LSCC and CRUS, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

LSCC vs. CRUS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LSCC drawdown since its inception was -97.34%, roughly equal to the maximum CRUS drawdown of -97.48%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LSCC and CRUS.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


LSCCCRUSDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-97.34%

-97.48%

+0.14%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-19.33%

-18.26%

-1.07%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-61.09%

-46.85%

-14.24%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-61.09%

-46.85%

-14.24%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-61.09%

-55.94%

-5.15%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-11.48%

-15.95%

+4.47%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-55.03%

-52.64%

-2.39%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

7.05%

7.14%

-0.09%

Volatility

LSCC vs. CRUS - Volatility Comparison

Lattice Semiconductor Corporation (LSCC) has a higher volatility of 21.32% compared to Cirrus Logic, Inc. (CRUS) at 10.73%. This indicates that LSCC's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CRUS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


LSCCCRUSDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

21.32%

10.73%

+10.59%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

45.46%

27.17%

+18.29%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

57.31%

35.95%

+21.36%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

54.84%

36.34%

+18.50%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

50.83%

40.12%

+10.71%

Dividends

LSCC vs. CRUS - Dividend Comparison

Neither LSCC nor CRUS has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Financials

LSCC vs. CRUS - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Lattice Semiconductor Corporation and Cirrus Logic, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


100.00M200.00M300.00M400.00M500.00M600.00MOctober2022AprilJulyOctober2023AprilJulyOctober2024AprilJulyOctober2025AprilJulyOctober2026April
170.90M
448.52M
(LSCC) Total Revenue
(CRUS) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

LSCC vs. CRUS - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Lattice Semiconductor Corporation and Cirrus Logic, Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

50.0%55.0%60.0%65.0%70.0%October2022AprilJulyOctober2023AprilJulyOctober2024AprilJulyOctober2025AprilJulyOctober2026April
68.8%
53.0%
Portfolio components
LSCC - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Lattice Semiconductor Corporation reported a gross profit of 117.63M and revenue of 170.90M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 68.8%.

CRUS - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Cirrus Logic, Inc. reported a gross profit of 237.64M and revenue of 448.52M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 53.0%.

LSCC - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Lattice Semiconductor Corporation reported an operating income of 26.07M and revenue of 170.90M, resulting in an operating margin of 15.3%.

CRUS - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Cirrus Logic, Inc. reported an operating income of 90.30M and revenue of 448.52M, resulting in an operating margin of 20.1%.

LSCC - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Lattice Semiconductor Corporation reported a net income of 21.82M and revenue of 170.90M, resulting in a net margin of 12.8%.

CRUS - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Cirrus Logic, Inc. reported a net income of 81.81M and revenue of 448.52M, resulting in a net margin of 18.2%.


Frequently Asked Questions


LSCC and CRUS have a correlation of 0.50, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

LSCC has higher volatility (21.32%) compared to CRUS (10.73%). In terms of maximum drawdown, LSCC dropped -97.34% vs CRUS's -97.48%.

LSCC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.64 vs 1.16), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for LSCC and CRUS

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer