LSCC vs. CDNS

In the year-to-date period, LSCC achieves a 2.95% return, which is significantly higher than CDNS's 1.71% return. Over the past 10 years, LSCC has underperformed CDNS with an annualized return of 24.14%, while CDNS has yielded a comparatively higher 32.71% annualized return.

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Lattice Semiconductor Corporation (LSCC) and Cadence Design Systems, Inc. (CDNS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

The current LSCC Sharpe Ratio is -0.17, which is lower than the CDNS Sharpe Ratio of 0.32. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LSCC and CDNS, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Neither LSCC nor CDNS has paid dividends to shareholders.

The maximum LSCC drawdown since its inception was -97.34%, roughly equal to the maximum CDNS drawdown of -93.13%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LSCC and CDNS. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.

Lattice Semiconductor Corporation (LSCC) has a higher volatility of 11.46% compared to Cadence Design Systems, Inc. (CDNS) at 6.92%. This indicates that LSCC's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CDNS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Lattice Semiconductor Corporation and Cadence Design Systems, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.