LSCC vs. CDNS

Last updated Apr 1, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Lattice Semiconductor Corporation (LSCC) and Cadence Design Systems, Inc. (CDNS).

Performance

LSCC vs. CDNS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Lattice Semiconductor Corporation (LSCC) and Cadence Design Systems, Inc. (CDNS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

LSCC vs. CDNS - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
LSCC Lattice Semiconductor Corporation	26.07%	29.89%	-17.89%	6.33%	-15.81%	68.18%	139.39%	176.59%	19.72%	-21.47%
CDNS Cadence Design Systems, Inc.	-11.10%	4.03%	10.31%	69.55%	-13.80%	36.59%	96.70%	59.52%	3.97%	65.82%

Fundamentals

Market Cap LSCC : $12.68B CDNS : $75.84B
EPS LSCC : $0.02 CDNS : $4.06
PE Ratio LSCC : 4.13K CDNS : 68.49
PS Ratio LSCC : 24.37 CDNS : 14.34
PB Ratio LSCC : 18.29 CDNS : 10.67
Total Revenue (TTM) LSCC : $523.26M CDNS : $5.30B
Gross Profit (TTM) LSCC : $356.94M CDNS : $5.09B
EBITDA (TTM) LSCC : $45.55M CDNS : $1.74B

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LSCC achieves a 26.07% return, which is significantly higher than CDNS's -11.10% return. Over the past 10 years, LSCC has outperformed CDNS with an annualized return of 32.43%, while CDNS has yielded a comparatively lower 27.94% annualized return.

LSCC

• 1D: 8.72%
• 1M: -2.99%
• YTD: 26.07%
• 6M: 26.51%
• 1Y: 76.85%
• 3Y*: -0.97%
• 5Y*: 13.76%
• 10Y*: 32.43%

CDNS

• 1D: 2.58%
• 1M: -7.81%
• YTD: -11.10%
• 6M: -20.89%
• 1Y: 9.26%
• 3Y*: 9.77%
• 5Y*: 14.45%
• 10Y*: 27.94%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Return for Risk

LSCC vs. CDNS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

LSCC

LSCC Risk / Return Rank: 80
LSCC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 80
LSCC Sortino Ratio Rank: 78
LSCC Omega Ratio Rank: 78
LSCC Calmar Ratio Rank: 81
LSCC Martin Ratio Rank: 84

CDNS

CDNS Risk / Return Rank: 49
CDNS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 51
CDNS Sortino Ratio Rank: 47
CDNS Omega Ratio Rank: 46
CDNS Calmar Ratio Rank: 50
CDNS Martin Ratio Rank: 50

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

LSCC vs. CDNS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Lattice Semiconductor Corporation (LSCC) and Cadence Design Systems, Inc. (CDNS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	LSCC	CDNS	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	1.24	0.23	+1.00
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	1.97	0.63	+1.34
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.27	1.08	+0.19
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.38	0.29	+2.08
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	7.14	0.65	+6.48
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

LSCC vs. CDNS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current LSCC Sharpe Ratio is 1.24, which is higher than the CDNS Sharpe Ratio of 0.23. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LSCC and CDNS, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	LSCC	CDNS	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.24	0.23	+1.00
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.26	0.41	-0.16
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.64	0.84	-0.20
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.20	0.22	-0.02

Correlation

The correlation between LSCC and CDNS is 0.40, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.

Dividends

LSCC vs. CDNS - Dividend Comparison

Neither LSCC nor CDNS has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Drawdowns

LSCC vs. CDNS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LSCC drawdown since its inception was -97.34%, roughly equal to the maximum CDNS drawdown of -93.13%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LSCC and CDNS.

Drawdown Indicators

	LSCC	CDNS	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-97.34%	-93.13%	-4.21%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-28.50%	-28.09%	-0.41%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-61.09%	-29.59%	-31.50%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-61.09%	-32.12%	-28.97%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-12.30%	-25.58%	+13.28%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-55.42%	-39.79%	-15.63%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	9.49%	12.61%	-3.12%

Volatility

LSCC vs. CDNS - Volatility Comparison

Lattice Semiconductor Corporation (LSCC) has a higher volatility of 22.11% compared to Cadence Design Systems, Inc. (CDNS) at 7.46%. This indicates that LSCC's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CDNS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	LSCC	CDNS	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	22.11%	7.46%	+14.65%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	40.40%	25.41%	+14.99%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	62.74%	39.60%	+23.14%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	53.93%	35.27%	+18.66%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	50.61%	33.43%	+17.18%

Financials