LSCC vs. ON
LSCC (Lattice Semiconductor Corporation) and ON (ON Semiconductor Corporation) are both stocks. Both operate in the Semiconductors industry within the Technology sector. Over the past 10 years, LSCC returned 38.28%/yr vs 29.48%/yr for ON. A 0.52 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined.
Performance
LSCC vs. ON - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, LSCC achieves a 105.69% return, which is significantly lower than ON's 137.56% return. Over the past 10 years, LSCC has outperformed ON with an annualized return of 38.28%, while ON has yielded a comparatively lower 29.48% annualized return.
LSCC
- 1D
- 4.57%
- 1M
- 25.12%
- YTD
- 105.69%
- 6M
- 111.95%
- 1Y
- 237.38%
- 3Y*
- 23.91%
- 5Y*
- 24.29%
- 10Y*
- 38.28%
ON
- 1D
- 6.38%
- 1M
- 24.86%
- YTD
- 137.56%
- 6M
- 149.88%
- 1Y
- 202.40%
- 3Y*
- 14.00%
- 5Y*
- 27.80%
- 10Y*
- 29.48%
LSCC vs. ON - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LSCC Lattice Semiconductor Corporation | 105.69% | 29.89% | -17.89% | 6.33% | -15.81% | 68.18% | 139.39% | 176.59% | 19.72% | -21.47% |
ON ON Semiconductor Corporation | 137.56% | -14.12% | -24.52% | 33.93% | -8.17% | 107.52% | 34.25% | 47.67% | -21.16% | 64.11% |
Correlation
The correlation between LSCC and ON is 0.60, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.60 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.70 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.75 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.65 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 3, 2000 | 0.52 |
The correlation between LSCC and ON shifts across timeframes, from 0.52 (all time) to 0.75 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
LSCC:
$21.10B
ON:
$50.70B
LSCC:
$0.14
ON:
$1.42
LSCC:
1.05K
ON:
90.77
LSCC:
36.37
ON:
8.59
LSCC:
28.50
ON:
6.94
LSCC:
$574.01M
ON:
$6.06B
LSCC:
$383.93M
ON:
$2.26B
LSCC:
$65.23M
ON:
$1.21B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
LSCC vs. ON — Risk / Return Rank
LSCC
ON
LSCC vs. ON - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Lattice Semiconductor Corporation (LSCC) and ON Semiconductor Corporation (ON). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| LSCC | ON | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 4.50 | 3.79 | +0.71 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 4.51 | 3.96 | +0.55 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.58 | 1.51 | +0.08 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 12.25 | 7.34 | +4.91 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 36.53 | 14.87 | +21.66 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| LSCC | ON | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 4.50 | 3.79 | +0.71 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.45 | 0.53 | -0.08 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.76 | 0.58 | +0.18 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.23 | 0.11 | +0.12 |
Drawdowns
LSCC vs. ON - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum LSCC drawdown since its inception was -97.34%, roughly equal to the maximum ON drawdown of -96.22%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LSCC and ON.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| LSCC | ON | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -97.34% | -96.22% | -1.12% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -19.33% | -28.10% | +8.77% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -61.09% | -70.44% | +9.35% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -61.09% | -70.44% | +9.35% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -61.09% | -70.44% | +9.35% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -55.17% | -53.24% | -1.93% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 6.48% | 13.86% | -7.38% |
Volatility
LSCC vs. ON - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Lattice Semiconductor Corporation (LSCC) is 16.73%, while ON Semiconductor Corporation (ON) has a volatility of 19.90%. This indicates that LSCC experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ON based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| LSCC | ON | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 16.73% | 19.90% | -3.17% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 40.62% | 38.52% | +2.10% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 53.14% | 53.75% | -0.61% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 53.95% | 52.96% | +0.99% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 50.46% | 50.91% | -0.45% |
Dividends
LSCC vs. ON - Dividend Comparison
Neither LSCC nor ON has paid dividends to shareholders.
Financials
LSCC vs. ON - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Lattice Semiconductor Corporation and ON Semiconductor Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
LSCC vs. ON - Profitability Comparison
LSCC - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Lattice Semiconductor Corporation reported a gross profit of 117.63M and revenue of 170.90M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 68.8%.
ON - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, ON Semiconductor Corporation reported a gross profit of 583.10M and revenue of 1.51B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 38.5%.
LSCC - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Lattice Semiconductor Corporation reported an operating income of 26.07M and revenue of 170.90M, resulting in an operating margin of 15.3%.
ON - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, ON Semiconductor Corporation reported an operating income of -53.40M and revenue of 1.51B, resulting in an operating margin of -3.5%.
LSCC - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Lattice Semiconductor Corporation reported a net income of 21.82M and revenue of 170.90M, resulting in a net margin of 12.8%.
ON - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, ON Semiconductor Corporation reported a net income of -33.40M and revenue of 1.51B, resulting in a net margin of -2.2%.
Frequently Asked Questions
LSCC and ON have a correlation of 0.60, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
ON has higher volatility (19.90%) compared to LSCC (16.73%). In terms of maximum drawdown, LSCC dropped -97.34% vs ON's -96.22%.
LSCC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (4.50 vs 3.79), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for LSCC and ON
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer