LSCC vs. ON
Compare and contrast key facts about Lattice Semiconductor Corporation (LSCC) and ON Semiconductor Corporation (ON).
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: LSCC or ON.
Correlation
The correlation between LSCC and ON is 0.80, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Performance
LSCC vs. ON - Performance Comparison
Loading data...
Key characteristics
LSCC:
85.23%
ON:
21.29%
LSCC:
-9.28%
ON:
0.00%
LSCC:
-5.39%
ON:
0.00%
Fundamentals
LSCC:
$6.82B
ON:
$17.12B
LSCC:
$0.37
ON:
$1.44
LSCC:
134.14
ON:
28.46
LSCC:
3.18
ON:
1.77
LSCC:
13.96
ON:
2.57
LSCC:
9.64
ON:
2.13
LSCC:
$488.74M
ON:
$6.67B
LSCC:
$316.66M
ON:
$2.64B
LSCC:
$66.92M
ON:
$1.30B
Returns By Period
LSCC
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
ON
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
LSCC vs. ON — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank
LSCC
ON
LSCC vs. ON - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Lattice Semiconductor Corporation (LSCC) and ON Semiconductor Corporation (ON). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Loading data...
Dividends
LSCC vs. ON - Dividend Comparison
Neither LSCC nor ON has paid dividends to shareholders.
Drawdowns
LSCC vs. ON - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum LSCC drawdown since its inception was -9.28%, which is greater than ON's maximum drawdown of 0.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LSCC and ON. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Loading data...
Volatility
LSCC vs. ON - Volatility Comparison
Loading data...
Financials
LSCC vs. ON - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Lattice Semiconductor Corporation and ON Semiconductor Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
LSCC vs. ON - Profitability Comparison
LSCC - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Lattice Semiconductor Corporation reported a gross profit of 81.73M and revenue of 120.15M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 68.0%.
ON - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, ON Semiconductor Corporation reported a gross profit of 293.80M and revenue of 1.45B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 20.3%.
LSCC - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Lattice Semiconductor Corporation reported an operating income of 6.97M and revenue of 120.15M, resulting in an operating margin of 5.8%.
ON - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, ON Semiconductor Corporation reported an operating income of -573.70M and revenue of 1.45B, resulting in an operating margin of -39.7%.
LSCC - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Lattice Semiconductor Corporation reported a net income of 5.02M and revenue of 120.15M, resulting in a net margin of 4.2%.
ON - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, ON Semiconductor Corporation reported a net income of -486.10M and revenue of 1.45B, resulting in a net margin of -33.6%.