LRNZ vs. SPY
LRNZ (TrueShares Technology, AI & Deep Learning ETF) and SPY (State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - LRNZ is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund actively managed by TrueMark Investments, while SPY is a S&P 500 fund tracking the S&P 500 Index. LRNZ is actively managed, while SPY is passively managed. With a 1.00 correlation, they move nearly in lockstep. LRNZ charges 0.68%/yr vs 0.09%/yr for SPY.
Performance
LRNZ vs. SPY - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
LRNZ
- 1D
- -2.30%
- 1M
- —
- 6M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
SPY
- 1D
- -0.77%
- 1M
- 1.26%
- 6M
- 8.34%
- YTD
- 10.45%
- 1Y
- 21.46%
- 3Y*
- 20.07%
- 5Y*
- 12.94%
- 10Y*
- 15.08%
LRNZ vs. SPY - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
LRNZ TrueShares Technology, AI & Deep Learning ETF | -3.01% |
SPY State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF | -0.34% |
Correlation
The correlation between LRNZ and SPY is 1.00 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 10, 2026 | 1.00 |
LRNZ vs. SPY - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
LRNZ
SPY
Technology
Healthcare
Communication Services
Basic Materials
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Energy
-
Financial Services
-
Industrials
-
Real Estate
-
Utilities
-
Technology
LRNZ
SPY
Healthcare
LRNZ
SPY
Communication Services
LRNZ
SPY
Basic Materials
LRNZ
-
SPY
Consumer Cyclical
LRNZ
-
SPY
Consumer Defensive
LRNZ
-
SPY
Energy
LRNZ
-
SPY
Financial Services
LRNZ
-
SPY
Industrials
LRNZ
-
SPY
Real Estate
LRNZ
-
SPY
Utilities
LRNZ
-
SPY
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
LRNZ vs. SPY — Risk / Return Rank
LRNZ
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
SPY
LRNZ vs. SPY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for TrueShares Technology, AI & Deep Learning ETF (LRNZ) and State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF (SPY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| LRNZ | SPY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.31 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 2.43 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 10.57 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
LRNZ vs. SPY - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum LRNZ drawdown since its inception was -3.01%, smaller than the maximum SPY drawdown of -55.19%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LRNZ and SPY.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| LRNZ | SPY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -3.01% | -55.19% | +52.18% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -8.88% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -18.76% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -24.50% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -33.72% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.01% | -1.12% | -1.89% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.87% | -9.02% | +7.15% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 2.03% | — |
Volatility
LRNZ vs. SPY - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| LRNZ | SPY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 4.26% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 10.01% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 17.72% | 12.60% | +5.12% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.72% | 17.17% | +0.55% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.72% | 17.93% | -0.21% |
LRNZ vs. SPY - Expense Ratio Comparison
LRNZ has a 0.68% expense ratio, which is higher than SPY's 0.09% expense ratio.
Dividends
LRNZ vs. SPY - Dividend Comparison
LRNZ has not paid dividends to shareholders, while SPY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.00%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LRNZ TrueShares Technology, AI & Deep Learning ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SPY State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF | 1.00% | 1.07% | 1.21% | 1.40% | 1.65% | 1.20% | 1.52% | 1.75% | 2.04% | 1.80% | 2.03% | 2.06% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 1.00, LRNZ and SPY move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
On fees, SPY is cheaper at 0.09% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
SPY is cheaper with a 0.09% expense ratio, compared with 0.68% for LRNZ.
SPY has the higher dividend yield at 1.00%, compared with 0.00% for LRNZ.
LRNZ is categorized as Large Cap Growth Equities, while SPY is S&P 500. They also come from different issuers: TrueMark Investments and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.68% for LRNZ and 0.09% for SPY.
Find the right allocation for LRNZ and SPY
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer