LRGG vs. MEME

Last updated Jun 23, 2026

LRGG (Nomura Focused Large Growth ETF) and MEME (Roundhill Meme Stock ETF) are both Large Cap Growth Equities funds. Both are actively managed. At a 0.35 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. LRGG charges 0.45%/yr vs 0.69%/yr for MEME.

Performance

LRGG vs. MEME - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Nomura Focused Large Growth ETF (LRGG) and Roundhill Meme Stock ETF (MEME). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LRGG achieves a -8.45% return, which is significantly lower than MEME's 67.74% return.

LRGG

• 1D: -1.68%
• 1M: -3.66%
• YTD: -8.45%
• 6M: -8.24%
• 1Y: -1.59%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

MEME

• 1D: 0.58%
• 1M: -4.41%
• YTD: 67.74%
• 6M: 49.43%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

LRGG vs. MEME - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
LRGG Nomura Focused Large Growth ETF	-8.45%	-1.38%
MEME Roundhill Meme Stock ETF	67.74%	-38.00%

Correlation

The correlation between LRGG and MEME is 0.35, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 8, 2025	0.35

LRGG vs. MEME - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	LRGG	MEME
Technology	46.8%	66.7%
Financial Services	18.2%	5.5%
Industrials	11.3%	22.3%
Healthcare	8.7%	5.4%
Consumer Cyclical	7.9%	-
Communication Services	7.1%	5.5%
Consumer Defensive	1.8%	-
Real Estate	1.8%	-
Basic Materials	-	4.6%
Energy	-	4.8%
Utilities	-	4.9%

Return for Risk

LRGG vs. MEME — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

LRGG

LRGG Risk / Return Rank: 7
LRGG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8
LRGG Sortino Ratio Rank: 7
LRGG Omega Ratio Rank: 7
LRGG Calmar Ratio Rank: 8
LRGG Martin Ratio Rank: 7

MEME

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

LRGG vs. MEME - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Nomura Focused Large Growth ETF (LRGG) and Roundhill Meme Stock ETF (MEME). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	LRGG	MEME	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	-0.11	—	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	-0.06	—	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.99	—	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.08	—	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	-0.22	—	—

Drawdowns

LRGG vs. MEME - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LRGG drawdown since its inception was -18.94%, smaller than the maximum MEME drawdown of -48.78%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LRGG and MEME.

Drawdown Indicators

	LRGG	MEME	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-18.94%	-48.78%	+29.84%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-18.94%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-11.43%	-11.86%	+0.43%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-4.37%	-28.69%	+24.32%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	7.40%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	LRGG	MEME	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	5.54%	—	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	11.75%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	14.27%	75.35%	-61.08%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	16.74%	75.35%	-58.61%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	16.74%	75.35%	-58.61%

LRGG vs. MEME - Expense Ratio Comparison

LRGG has a 0.45% expense ratio, which is lower than MEME's 0.69% expense ratio.

Dividends

LRGG vs. MEME - Dividend Comparison

LRGG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.17%, while MEME has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024
LRGG Nomura Focused Large Growth ETF	0.17%	0.16%	0.13%
MEME Roundhill Meme Stock ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both LRGG and MEME in my portfolio?

LRGG and MEME have a correlation of 0.35, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, LRGG or MEME?

On fees, LRGG is cheaper at 0.45% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, LRGG or MEME?

LRGG is cheaper with a 0.45% expense ratio, compared with 0.69% for MEME.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, LRGG or MEME?

LRGG has the higher dividend yield at 0.17%, compared with 0.00% for MEME.

What is the main difference between LRGG and MEME?

They also come from different issuers: Nomura and Roundhill. Their fees differ too: 0.45% for LRGG and 0.69% for MEME.