LRGG vs. BIBL

Last updated Apr 1, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Nomura Focused Large Growth ETF (LRGG) and Inspire 100 ETF (BIBL).

LRGG and BIBL are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. LRGG is an actively managed fund by Nomura. It was launched on May 14, 2024. BIBL is a passively managed fund by Inspire that tracks the performance of the Inspire 100 Index. It was launched on Oct 30, 2017.

Performance

LRGG vs. BIBL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Nomura Focused Large Growth ETF (LRGG) and Inspire 100 ETF (BIBL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

LRGG vs. BIBL - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
LRGG Nomura Focused Large Growth ETF	-13.46%	7.65%	8.81%
BIBL Inspire 100 ETF	4.92%	17.27%	1.17%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LRGG achieves a -13.46% return, which is significantly lower than BIBL's 4.92% return.

LRGG

• 1D: 2.67%
• 1M: -5.05%
• YTD: -13.46%
• 6M: -14.62%
• 1Y: -1.81%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

BIBL

• 1D: 3.22%
• 1M: -5.73%
• YTD: 4.92%
• 6M: 6.80%
• 1Y: 24.23%
• 3Y*: 15.73%
• 5Y*: 8.13%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

LRGG vs. BIBL - Expense Ratio Comparison

LRGG has a 0.45% expense ratio, which is higher than BIBL's 0.35% expense ratio.

LRGG

Nomura Focused Large Growth ETF

BIBL

Inspire 100 ETF

Return for Risk

LRGG vs. BIBL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

LRGG

LRGG Risk / Return Rank: 10
LRGG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 10
LRGG Sortino Ratio Rank: 9
LRGG Omega Ratio Rank: 9
LRGG Calmar Ratio Rank: 10
LRGG Martin Ratio Rank: 10

BIBL

BIBL Risk / Return Rank: 72
BIBL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 69
BIBL Sortino Ratio Rank: 70
BIBL Omega Ratio Rank: 70
BIBL Calmar Ratio Rank: 72
BIBL Martin Ratio Rank: 80

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

LRGG vs. BIBL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Nomura Focused Large Growth ETF (LRGG) and Inspire 100 ETF (BIBL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	LRGG	BIBL	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	-0.10	1.20	-1.29
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	-0.01	1.72	-1.73
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.00	1.25	-0.25
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.09	1.78	-1.87
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	-0.28	8.47	-8.75
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

LRGG vs. BIBL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current LRGG Sharpe Ratio is -0.10, which is lower than the BIBL Sharpe Ratio of 1.20. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LRGG and BIBL, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	LRGG	BIBL	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.10	1.20	-1.29
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	0.42	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.04	0.53	-0.49

Correlation

The correlation between LRGG and BIBL is 0.68, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.

Dividends

LRGG vs. BIBL - Dividend Comparison

LRGG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.18%, less than BIBL's 1.12% yield.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
LRGG Nomura Focused Large Growth ETF	0.18%	0.16%	0.13%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
BIBL Inspire 100 ETF	1.12%	1.01%	0.92%	1.02%	0.98%	17.87%	1.67%	1.30%	1.49%	0.31%

Drawdowns

LRGG vs. BIBL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LRGG drawdown since its inception was -18.94%, smaller than the maximum BIBL drawdown of -36.12%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LRGG and BIBL.

Drawdown Indicators

	LRGG	BIBL	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-18.94%	-36.12%	+17.18%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-18.94%	-13.93%	-5.01%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-30.85%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-16.27%	-6.01%	-10.26%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-3.74%	-7.17%	+3.43%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	5.90%	2.93%	+2.97%

Volatility

LRGG vs. BIBL - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Nomura Focused Large Growth ETF (LRGG) is 5.44%, while Inspire 100 ETF (BIBL) has a volatility of 6.90%. This indicates that LRGG experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BIBL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	LRGG	BIBL	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	5.44%	6.90%	-1.46%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	10.72%	12.24%	-1.52%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	18.29%	20.37%	-2.08%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	16.89%	19.44%	-2.55%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	16.89%	21.15%	-4.26%