LRGE vs. RPG

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

LRGE (ClearBridge Large Cap Growth ESG ETF) and RPG (Invesco S&P 500 Pure Growth ETF) are both Large Cap Growth Equities funds. LRGE is actively managed, while RPG is passively managed. Over the past 5 years, LRGE returned 9.18%/yr vs 11.59%/yr for RPG. A 0.79 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. LRGE charges 0.59%/yr vs 0.35%/yr for RPG.

Performance

LRGE vs. RPG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in ClearBridge Large Cap Growth ESG ETF (LRGE) and Invesco S&P 500 Pure Growth ETF (RPG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LRGE achieves a 0.89% return, which is significantly lower than RPG's 30.31% return.

LRGE

• 1D: -1.84%
• 1M: -3.75%
• YTD: 0.89%
• 6M: -0.18%
• 1Y: 8.68%
• 3Y*: 16.05%
• 5Y*: 9.18%
• 10Y*: —

RPG

• 1D: -4.60%
• 1M: 5.48%
• YTD: 30.31%
• 6M: 27.62%
• 1Y: 38.51%
• 3Y*: 27.72%
• 5Y*: 11.59%
• 10Y*: 15.14%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

LRGE vs. RPG - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
LRGE ClearBridge Large Cap Growth ESG ETF	0.89%	9.54%	26.32%	46.36%	-31.45%	22.93%	31.89%	33.38%	-0.38%	16.01%
RPG Invesco S&P 500 Pure Growth ETF	30.31%	13.41%	28.23%	8.04%	-27.55%	29.40%	29.34%	28.34%	-4.53%	12.67%

Correlation

The correlation between LRGE and RPG is 0.70, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.70
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.77
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.82
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 25, 2017	0.79

The correlation between LRGE and RPG shifts across timeframes, from 0.70 (1 year) to 0.82 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

LRGE vs. RPG - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	LRGE	RPG
Technology	48.0%	46.9%
Consumer Cyclical	17.4%	14.7%
Communication Services	13.7%	5.4%
Financial Services	6.0%	5.3%
Healthcare	5.9%	6.4%
Industrials	4.3%	14.0%
Basic Materials	2.6%	1.2%
Consumer Defensive	2.0%	1.1%
Energy	-	1.6%
Real Estate	-	1.0%
Utilities	-	2.4%

Return for Risk

LRGE vs. RPG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

LRGE

LRGE Risk / Return Rank: 16
LRGE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 17
LRGE Sortino Ratio Rank: 15
LRGE Omega Ratio Rank: 16
LRGE Calmar Ratio Rank: 15
LRGE Martin Ratio Rank: 16

RPG

RPG Risk / Return Rank: 61
RPG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 55
RPG Sortino Ratio Rank: 52
RPG Omega Ratio Rank: 53
RPG Calmar Ratio Rank: 72
RPG Martin Ratio Rank: 73

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

LRGE vs. RPG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ClearBridge Large Cap Growth ESG ETF (LRGE) and Invesco S&P 500 Pure Growth ETF (RPG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	LRGE	RPG	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.51	1.75	-1.25
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	0.78	2.37	-1.59
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.10	1.31	-0.21
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.53	3.49	-2.96
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	1.55	13.16	-11.61

LRGE vs. RPG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current LRGE Sharpe Ratio is 0.51, which is lower than the RPG Sharpe Ratio of 1.75. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LRGE and RPG, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

LRGE vs. RPG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LRGE drawdown since its inception was -37.03%, smaller than the maximum RPG drawdown of -53.27%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LRGE and RPG.

Drawdown Indicators

	LRGE	RPG	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-37.03%	-53.27%	+16.24%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-16.32%	-11.08%	-5.24%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-20.26%	-24.75%	+4.49%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-37.03%	-35.59%	-1.44%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-36.58%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-6.22%	-4.60%	-1.62%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-7.18%	-8.83%	+1.65%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	5.61%	2.93%	+2.68%

Volatility

LRGE vs. RPG - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for ClearBridge Large Cap Growth ESG ETF (LRGE) is 6.36%, while Invesco S&P 500 Pure Growth ETF (RPG) has a volatility of 11.10%. This indicates that LRGE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than RPG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	LRGE	RPG	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	6.36%	11.10%	-4.74%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	13.53%	19.02%	-5.49%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	17.20%	22.09%	-4.89%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	20.82%	23.86%	-3.04%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	20.64%	22.90%	-2.26%

LRGE vs. RPG - Expense Ratio Comparison

LRGE has a 0.59% expense ratio, which is higher than RPG's 0.35% expense ratio.

Dividends

LRGE vs. RPG - Dividend Comparison

LRGE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.13%, less than RPG's 0.15% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
LRGE ClearBridge Large Cap Growth ESG ETF	0.13%	0.13%	0.18%	0.11%	2.02%	1.20%	0.37%	0.37%	2.10%	0.37%	0.00%	0.00%
RPG Invesco S&P 500 Pure Growth ETF	0.15%	0.24%	0.25%	1.44%	0.74%	0.00%	0.46%	0.83%	0.47%	0.56%	0.43%	0.73%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both LRGE and RPG in my portfolio?

LRGE and RPG have a correlation of 0.70, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, LRGE or RPG?

RPG has higher volatility (11.10%) compared to LRGE (6.36%). In terms of maximum drawdown, LRGE dropped -37.03% vs RPG's -53.27%.

Which ETF is better, LRGE or RPG?

On 5-year performance, RPG leads with 11.59% vs 9.18% for LRGE. On fees, RPG is cheaper at 0.35% per year. On volatility, LRGE has been the lower-risk option at 6.36%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, LRGE or RPG?

Over the 5-year period, RPG has performed better with a 11.59% return vs 9.18%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, LRGE or RPG?

RPG is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.59% for LRGE.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, LRGE or RPG?

RPG has the higher dividend yield at 0.15%, compared with 0.13% for LRGE.

What is the main difference between LRGE and RPG?

They also come from different issuers: Franklin Templeton and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.59% for LRGE and 0.35% for RPG.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

RPG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.75 vs 0.51), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.