LRGE vs. IUSG
LRGE (ClearBridge Large Cap Growth ESG ETF) and IUSG (iShares Core S&P U.S. Growth ETF) are both Large Cap Growth Equities funds. LRGE is actively managed, while IUSG is passively managed. Over the past 5 years, LRGE returned 11.14%/yr vs 15.67%/yr for IUSG. Their correlation of 0.88 suggests significant overlap in exposure. LRGE charges 0.59%/yr vs 0.04%/yr for IUSG.
Performance
LRGE vs. IUSG - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, LRGE achieves a 6.31% return, which is significantly lower than IUSG's 14.00% return.
LRGE
- 1D
- 0.91%
- 1M
- 6.36%
- YTD
- 6.31%
- 6M
- 5.73%
- 1Y
- 14.26%
- 3Y*
- 19.29%
- 5Y*
- 11.14%
- 10Y*
- —
IUSG
- 1D
- -0.07%
- 1M
- 6.40%
- YTD
- 14.00%
- 6M
- 13.31%
- 1Y
- 33.47%
- 3Y*
- 27.62%
- 5Y*
- 15.67%
- 10Y*
- 17.82%
LRGE vs. IUSG - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LRGE ClearBridge Large Cap Growth ESG ETF | 6.31% | 9.54% | 26.32% | 46.36% | -31.45% | 22.93% | 31.89% | 33.38% | -0.38% | 16.00% |
IUSG iShares Core S&P U.S. Growth ETF | 14.00% | 21.23% | 34.70% | 29.28% | -28.81% | 31.26% | 32.65% | 30.62% | -0.79% | 12.11% |
Correlation
The correlation between LRGE and IUSG is 0.91, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.91 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.93 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.95 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 26, 2017 | 0.88 |
The correlation between LRGE and IUSG has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.88 to 0.95 - a consistent structural relationship.
LRGE vs. IUSG - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
LRGE
IUSG
Technology
Consumer Cyclical
Communication Services
Financial Services
Healthcare
Industrials
Basic Materials
Consumer Defensive
Energy
-
Real Estate
-
Utilities
-
Technology
LRGE
IUSG
Consumer Cyclical
LRGE
IUSG
Communication Services
LRGE
IUSG
Financial Services
LRGE
IUSG
Healthcare
LRGE
IUSG
Industrials
LRGE
IUSG
Basic Materials
LRGE
IUSG
Consumer Defensive
LRGE
IUSG
Energy
LRGE
-
IUSG
Real Estate
LRGE
-
IUSG
Utilities
LRGE
-
IUSG
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
LRGE vs. IUSG — Risk / Return Rank
LRGE
IUSG
LRGE vs. IUSG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ClearBridge Large Cap Growth ESG ETF (LRGE) and iShares Core S&P U.S. Growth ETF (IUSG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| LRGE | IUSG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.27 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.65 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.16 | 1.37 | -0.21 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.88 | 2.57 | -1.70 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.59 | 10.95 | -8.36 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| LRGE | IUSG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.87 | 2.14 | -1.27 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.54 | 0.75 | -0.21 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.88 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.76 | 0.38 | +0.38 |
Drawdowns
LRGE vs. IUSG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum LRGE drawdown since its inception was -37.03%, smaller than the maximum IUSG drawdown of -63.41%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LRGE and IUSG.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| LRGE | IUSG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -37.03% | -63.41% | +26.38% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -16.32% | -13.07% | -3.25% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -20.26% | -22.28% | +2.02% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -37.03% | -32.21% | -4.82% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -32.35% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.18% | -1.05% | -0.13% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.20% | -21.44% | +14.24% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 5.52% | 3.06% | +2.46% |
Volatility
LRGE vs. IUSG - Volatility Comparison
ClearBridge Large Cap Growth ESG ETF (LRGE) and iShares Core S&P U.S. Growth ETF (IUSG) have volatilities of 4.35% and 4.22%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| LRGE | IUSG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.35% | 4.22% | +0.13% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.52% | 12.23% | +0.29% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 16.45% | 15.71% | +0.74% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 20.68% | 20.86% | -0.18% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 20.60% | 20.40% | +0.20% |
LRGE vs. IUSG - Expense Ratio Comparison
LRGE has a 0.59% expense ratio, which is higher than IUSG's 0.04% expense ratio.
Dividends
LRGE vs. IUSG - Dividend Comparison
LRGE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.12%, less than IUSG's 0.47% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IUSG iShares Core S&P U.S. Growth ETF | 0.47% | 0.53% | 0.59% | 1.12% | 1.07% | 0.59% | 0.93% | 1.64% | 1.32% | 1.28% | 1.48% | 1.29% |
LRGE ClearBridge Large Cap Growth ESG ETF | 0.12% | 0.13% | 0.18% | 0.11% | 2.02% | 1.20% | 0.37% | 0.37% | 2.10% | 0.37% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.91, LRGE and IUSG move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
LRGE has higher volatility (4.35%) compared to IUSG (4.22%). In terms of maximum drawdown, LRGE dropped -37.03% vs IUSG's -63.41%.
On 5-year performance, IUSG leads with 15.67% vs 11.14% for LRGE. On fees, IUSG is cheaper at 0.04% per year. On volatility, IUSG has been the lower-risk option at 4.22%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, IUSG has performed better with a 15.67% return vs 11.14%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
IUSG is cheaper with a 0.04% expense ratio, compared with 0.59% for LRGE.
IUSG has the higher dividend yield at 0.47%, compared with 0.12% for LRGE.
They also come from different issuers: Franklin Templeton and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.59% for LRGE and 0.04% for IUSG.
IUSG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.14 vs 0.87), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for LRGE and IUSG
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer