LRCX vs. SSLN.L
LRCX (Lam Research Corporation) is a stock, while SSLN.L (iShares Physical Silver ETC) is Silver fund tracking the LBMA Silver Price. Over the past 10 years, LRCX returned 48.23%/yr vs 14.24%/yr for SSLN.L. At a 0.11 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
LRCX vs. SSLN.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
LRCX is traded in USD, while SSLN.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the SSLN.L values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, LRCX achieves a 114.54% return, which is significantly higher than SSLN.L's -5.64% return. Over the past 10 years, LRCX has outperformed SSLN.L with an annualized return of 48.23%, while SSLN.L has yielded a comparatively lower 14.24% annualized return.
LRCX
- 1D
- 1.18%
- 1M
- 24.16%
- YTD
- 114.54%
- 6M
- 128.79%
- 1Y
- 303.12%
- 3Y*
- 81.91%
- 5Y*
- 43.22%
- 10Y*
- 48.23%
SSLN.L
- 1D
- 5.12%
- 1M
- -23.67%
- YTD
- -5.64%
- 6M
- 9.43%
- 1Y
- 85.51%
- 3Y*
- 41.29%
- 5Y*
- 19.02%
- 10Y*
- 14.24%
LRCX vs. SSLN.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LRCX Lam Research Corporation | 114.54% | 139.16% | -6.84% | 88.63% | -40.72% | 53.66% | 64.18% | 119.33% | -24.40% | 76.21% |
SSLN.L iShares Physical Silver ETC | -5.64% | 147.64% | 21.15% | -1.25% | 3.38% | -12.63% | 45.36% | 17.20% | -8.94% | 3.39% |
Correlation
The correlation between LRCX and SSLN.L is 0.21, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.21 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.19 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.17 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.12 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 8, 2011 | 0.11 |
The correlation between LRCX and SSLN.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.11 (all time) to 0.21 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
LRCX vs. SSLN.L — Risk / Return Rank
LRCX
SSLN.L
LRCX vs. SSLN.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Lam Research Corporation (LRCX) and iShares Physical Silver ETC (SSLN.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| LRCX | SSLN.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +4.29 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +2.80 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.63 | 1.29 | +0.34 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 15.26 | 1.95 | +13.32 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 51.20 | 4.30 | +46.90 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
LRCX vs. SSLN.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum LRCX drawdown since its inception was -87.90%, which is greater than SSLN.L's maximum drawdown of -83.11%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LRCX and SSLN.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| LRCX | SSLN.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -87.90% | -83.11% | -4.79% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -20.01% | -43.71% | +23.70% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -47.10% | -43.71% | -3.39% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -56.39% | -43.71% | -12.68% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -56.39% | -43.71% | -12.68% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -40.83% | +40.83% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -28.17% | -65.48% | +37.31% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 5.95% | 19.83% | -13.88% |
Volatility
LRCX vs. SSLN.L - Volatility Comparison
Lam Research Corporation (LRCX) has a higher volatility of 21.52% compared to iShares Physical Silver ETC (SSLN.L) at 15.39%. This indicates that LRCX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SSLN.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| LRCX | SSLN.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 21.52% | 15.39% | +6.13% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 43.63% | 53.94% | -10.31% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 52.78% | 56.70% | -3.92% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 46.57% | 38.19% | +8.38% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 44.92% | 32.34% | +12.58% |
Dividends
LRCX vs. SSLN.L - Dividend Comparison
LRCX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.28%, while SSLN.L has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LRCX Lam Research Corporation | 0.28% | 0.57% | 1.19% | 0.95% | 1.53% | 0.78% | 1.04% | 1.54% | 2.79% | 1.01% | 1.28% | 1.36% |
SSLN.L iShares Physical Silver ETC | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
LRCX and SSLN.L have a correlation of 0.21, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
Find the right allocation for LRCX and SSLN.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer