LQDT vs. AVHNY
LQDT (Liquidity Services, Inc.) and AVHNY (Ackermans & Van Haaren NV ADR) are both stocks. LQDT operates in Internet Retail (Consumer Cyclical), while AVHNY operates in Engineering & Construction (Industrials). Over the past year, LQDT returned 66.01% vs 68.42% for AVHNY. Their 0.04 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship.
Performance
LQDT vs. AVHNY - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, LQDT achieves a 28.60% return, which is significantly higher than AVHNY's 2.08% return.
LQDT
- 1D
- 2.12%
- 1M
- 1.62%
- 6M
- 21.81%
- YTD
- 28.60%
- 1Y
- 66.01%
- 3Y*
- 32.20%
- 5Y*
- 14.46%
- 10Y*
- 16.97%
- ALL TIME*
- 5.83%
AVHNY
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 0.00%
- 6M
- 2.08%
- YTD
- 2.08%
- 1Y
- 68.42%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 38.63%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $0.00 | $0.00 | $0.00 | |
| $6.05M | $7.34M | $7.24M |
LQDT vs. AVHNY - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
LQDT Liquidity Services, Inc. | 28.60% | -6.13% | 47.65% |
AVHNY Ackermans & Van Haaren NV ADR | 2.08% | 76.45% | 0.00% |
Correlation
The correlation between LQDT and AVHNY is -0.06, meaning there was essentially no consistent relationship between their historical price movements. Each responded to its own set of market drivers.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | -0.06 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 11, 2024 | 0.04 |
The correlation between LQDT and AVHNY shifts across timeframes, from -0.06 (1 year) to 0.04 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
LQDT:
$1.22B
AVHNY:
$8.60B
LQDT:
$0.94
AVHNY:
€3.21
LQDT:
41.64
AVHNY:
7.11
LQDT:
2.62
AVHNY:
0.62
LQDT:
5.67
AVHNY:
1.31
LQDT:
$479.92M
AVHNY:
€11.98B
LQDT:
$111.22M
AVHNY:
€3.73B
LQDT:
$52.91M
AVHNY:
€2.52B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
LQDT vs. AVHNY — Risk / Return Rank
LQDT
AVHNY
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
LQDT vs. AVHNY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Liquidity Services, Inc. (LQDT) and Ackermans & Van Haaren NV ADR (AVHNY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| LQDT | AVHNY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.77 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.33 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.95 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 8.66 | — | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
LQDT vs. AVHNY - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum LQDT drawdown since its inception was -95.31%, which is greater than AVHNY's maximum drawdown of -2.64%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LQDT and AVHNY.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| LQDT | AVHNY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -95.31% | -2.64% | -92.67% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -21.53% | 0.00% | -21.53% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -41.08% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -57.57% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -72.78% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -40.27% | 0.00% | -40.27% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -62.05% | -0.68% | -61.37% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 7.33% | 0.00% | +7.33% |
Volatility
LQDT vs. AVHNY - Volatility Comparison
Liquidity Services, Inc. (LQDT) has a higher volatility of 8.56% compared to Ackermans & Van Haaren NV ADR (AVHNY) at 0.00%. This indicates that LQDT's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than AVHNY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| LQDT | AVHNY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 8.56% | 0.00% | +8.56% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 21.48% | 2.05% | +19.43% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 34.65% | 65.41% | -30.76% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 44.11% | 55.48% | -11.37% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 53.06% | 55.48% | -2.42% |
Dividends
LQDT vs. AVHNY - Dividend Comparison
LQDT has not paid dividends to shareholders, while AVHNY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.03%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 |
|---|---|---|
AVHNY Ackermans & Van Haaren NV ADR | 2.03% | 1.64% |
LQDT Liquidity Services, Inc. | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Financials
LQDT vs. AVHNY - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Liquidity Services, Inc. and Ackermans & Van Haaren NV ADR. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
LQDT vs. AVHNY - Profitability Comparison
LQDT - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Liquidity Services, Inc. reported a gross profit of -54.45M and revenue of 120.73M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was -45.1%.
AVHNY - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Ackermans & Van Haaren NV ADR reported a gross profit of 409.06M and revenue of 2.91B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 14.1%.
LQDT - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Liquidity Services, Inc. reported an operating income of 9.62M and revenue of 120.73M, resulting in an operating margin of 8.0%.
AVHNY - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Ackermans & Van Haaren NV ADR reported an operating income of 379.86M and revenue of 2.91B, resulting in an operating margin of 13.1%.
LQDT - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Liquidity Services, Inc. reported a net income of 7.52M and revenue of 120.73M, resulting in a net margin of 6.2%.
AVHNY - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Ackermans & Van Haaren NV ADR reported a net income of 316.94M and revenue of 2.91B, resulting in a net margin of 10.9%.
Frequently Asked Questions
LQDT and AVHNY have a correlation of -0.06, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
LQDT has higher volatility (8.56%) compared to AVHNY (0.00%). In terms of maximum drawdown, LQDT dropped -95.31% vs AVHNY's -2.64%.
LQDT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.84 vs 1.07), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for LQDT and AVHNY
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer